Severine's last book, Peaceland, is still something I thrust into the hands of my MA students and aid colleagues. Check out her new book, Frontlines of Peace. Here is a glowing NYT review.
At first I started skeptical of her main claim--that the world does too much peace building from the treetops rather than the grassroots. I still emphasize the center a lot more than Severine, but her argument made me realize how most of my career I'd spent emulating her advice.
My strategy for the last 15y has been to look in fragile places for mostly-ignored, somewhat wacky locals with bold ideas. That's how I came to study cash transfers in post-conflict zones, alternative dispute resolution to reduce village conflicts, or cognitive behavior therapy.
These brilliant, sometimes lonely voices had tinkered their way to successful programs. Most of the time my first reaction was "this is nuts". But their belief was infectious. And I had the tools and ability to help expand and test what they did.
Today one of those successes influenced how Chicago responded to a spike in homicides
economist.com/united-states/…
So, even though for national peace, I would still like to see attention to the treetops, and similar tinkering and testing there, we have a lot to learn and emulate from the grassroots. Highly recommended.

Buy the book here:
amzn.to/309zRUM

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chris Blattman

Chris Blattman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cblatts

3 Mar
Good thread. But my own view is that without a big shift in demand for economics faculty, we should not be expanding PhD programs. Rather, we should have MA programs that are not 1-year cash cows for econ programs who then neglect their MA students. Policy schools get this right.
The weirdest part about econ Twitter these last weeks is the number of people suggesting that departments admit more students without explaining who will pay for them or where they will get jobs afterwards. I don’t want our PhD funding to be a subsidy to Citibank.
A word on policy schools. It’s easy to screw this up as well. A lot of them teach most classes with adjuncts too (although these are good practitioners who care). But it’s possible to take 8 classes of “view from the trenches” and never get technical skills.
Read 6 tweets
25 Feb
The pandemic changed a lot of teaching for the worse, but I wanted to tweet how it spurred me to try to change the way we teach international policy and development @HarrisPolicy.

In short, we took the opportunity to try to get policymakers all over the world to teach classes.
One of the classes I'm most excited about is led by the staff of @BusaraCenter, a behavioral laboratory in Nairobi. A range of East African researchers, faculty, and Busara VP @MSchomerus are leading a class on behavioral research and economics. Students will run real studies!
What I liked the most is the theme Busara proposed -- representational and diversity issues in development, and what it means to be running research when there's such a power differential. So a quant class with meaningful anthropology, psychology, etc baked in. It's amazing.
Read 25 tweets
23 Feb
OK folks. What are your favorite book jackets out there? My publisher Viking has asked me for thoughts. The working title of my book is Why We Fight.
My target audience is the RNC whom I hope will buy as many copies of my book as they did Donald Trump Jr.'s
In addition, I think the audience is people who bought Why Nations Fail, Better Angels, or Guns Germs and Steel.
Read 4 tweets
5 Feb
Here's a story of unintended consequences, of academic theories and government policy gone wrong, of how damn hard it is to tackle organized crime, and of insights into what criminal organizations really want and do.

It starts in Medellin.

[Paper: osf.io/preprints/soca…]
First thing you need to know: Every low and middle income neighborhood in the city has a neighborhood gang called a combo. We did a census of them. Here's how it looks. Every square inch is claimed by one combo or another.
This is valuable territory. There's a healthy retail drug market. They make and collect loans. Some even run local monopolies on staples like arepas, eggs, yogurt, and cooking gas in neighborhoods like this.
Read 25 tweets
5 Feb
[Continued from previous thread]

When we left off, we were talking about what happened when states try to improve governing in underserved neighborhoods. Here's a "caravana" they held in each neighborhood, alongside the liaisons, where all agencies comes out to the sector.
After two years of intense state governance, relative state went down!!

Note: when we launched this with the city, we expected crowding out, and never expected the "crowding in" effect to dominate.
Now, to be clear, we don't see clear evidence of a rise in absolute levels of combo rule. There are some signs that the state struggled to deliver, and that decreased people's happiness with the state. But even where it worked well: no evidence of crowding out!
Read 15 tweets
4 Dec 20
it’s great that economists do lots of field work and interviews now. But think of the absolute sloppiest, terrible causal inference paper you can remember, from someone who doesn’t even know that they don’t know what they’re doing.

That’s how economists do qualitative research.
We can probably do better. We shouldn’t expect most papers to do better than that. But surely some papers should?

What percent? Even 1% using qualitative work to motivate a theory or understand the results of a program evaluation would be more than happens
Often these are econ-ethnographer partnerships. Some good collaborations I can think of:

Morduch and Rutherford and coauthors on financial diaries

Levitt and Venkatesh on Chicago gangs

Anything with Ensminger
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!