Is the Computer Misuse and Cybercrime, Act, No. 5 of 2018 operational? Yes it is. The chronology of events begins with the case by the Bloggers Association Kenya (BAKE). Thread..
The Bloggers Association Kenya (BAKE) challenged the legality and constitutionality of the Computer Misuse and Cybercrime Act (the Act) vide *Nairobi Constitutional Petition No. 206 of 2018 - Bloggers Association Kenya (BAKE) vs. Hon. Attorney General & 5 Others.
Pending the hearing and determination of that Petition, the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Hon. E.C. Mwita, J) in an order dated 30th May 2018 granted conservatory order suspending the coming into force of certain provisions of the Act.
Upon the hearing and consideration of the Petition, the High Court at Nairobi (Hon. J. Makau, J) in a judgment dated 20th February 2020, found the Petition to be unmerited and ordered inter alia that the Act is valid and does not violate the fundamental rights and freedoms.
The limitation was found to be in compliance of Article 24 of the Constitution, and that the impugned provisions of the Act are Constitutional. The court thereby dismissed the Petition.
Later in 2020, the Senate of the Republic of Kenya filed a Petition against the National Assembly (Petition No. 284 of 2019-Consolidated with Petition No. 353 of 2019) challenging laws that had been passed by the National Assembly in contravention of the Constitution.
In a judgement in the above Petition on the 29.10.2021, a three judge bench of the High Court of Kenya (Quorum: Hon. J. Ngaah, Hon. A. Ndungu and Hon. M.T. Matheka, JJ) allowed the Petition and declared the Computer Misuse Act & other laws* unconstitutional.
However, the High Court suspended its orders nullifying the impugned laws which included the Computer Misuse Act for a period of 9 months from the date of the judgment (29th day of October 2020).
This means that within 9 months, the National Assembly and Senate and all concerned parties ought to ensure that the laws that were declared unconstitutional comply with the provisions of Article 110 (3) of the Constitution.
Where the process of enacting those laws is not regularized by the National Assembly, the Senate and other concerned parties, the Computer Misuse Act will no longer be enforceable. However, as at today, it is still enforceable and infringements of the Act are still prosecutable.
Article 110(3) of the Constitution deals with Bills concerning county governments and states the speakers of the National Assembly and Senate shall jointly resolve any question as to whether a Bill concerns counties and, if it is, whether it is a special or ordinary Bill.
Correction. The Judgement was delivered on 29th October, 2020 and not 2021. ^admin.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
📢Uadilifu Case Management System reduces greatly the cases of lost files that were common. The Case Management System is designed to link the criminal justice chain actors. #Uadilifu#HakinaUsawa
The Uadilifu Case Management System increases efficiency by saving time ⏰and costs 💰incurred in service delivery. #Uadilifu#HakinaUsawa
The Uadilifu Case Management System allows for the accurate data collection on convictions, appeals, and the number of cases at a given time. #Uadilifu#HakinaUsawa
Case Management System 💼(Uadilifu) is a centralized electronic repository that captures, as well as updates cases and case documents, case proceedings, and records about suspects, under a unified user application for all. It has the following features; 👇
1. Document Tracking 📃 - This enables the office to track documents that have been received from investigative agencies like inquiry files, documents, general correspondence etc. or other parties.
2. E-filing 🗂️ - this enables prosecutors file documents in the Judiciary e-filing system allowing for seamless operations between the two Offices. Additionally, the linking of the two Offices ensures easy and efficient retrieval of information
👇👇👇👇👇
This week the ODPP will provide information on the Case Management system (Uadilifu) and why it is important to digitize the criminal justice system.
The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions developed and launched the case management system (Uadilifu), to enhance >>>
>> the process of case management, and the exchange of information between investigative agencies, the prosecution, and the judiciary.
We welcome you to learn and engage with us on this topic. #Uadilifu#Integrity
Until recently, our criminal justice system has been “very paper-driven” with each stakeholder, sitting within “data silos” not easily accessible or even shared with other partners. This brought issues such as;
Data tracking, File tracking & No accountability
.@ODPP_KE attention has been drawn to a misleading heading by a local newspaper claiming @EACCKenya did not probe allegations of irregular withdrawal of Ksh 26.1 million from Wajir County Government by county officials. #Clarification_ODPP
On contrary, the IO in his testimony on 10/2/2020 during cross examination by defence confirmed @EACCKenya was involved & that more officers from the Forensic Department were deployed from @EACCKenya Headquarters to boost Wajir team in investigations.
The IO testified that investigations revealed the accused persons conived to withdraw the said monies by 5 cheques at KCB, Wajir branch between 2nd & 9th October, 2018.
Court upholds DPP Noordin Haji's application that Governors Lenolkulal & Waititu remain out of office during the trial of their corruption cases. Justice Jamila Mohammed read the judgement on behalf of Judges David Musinga, Steven Gatembu & Agnes Murgor.
1. Following the arraignment of Directors of Keroche Breweries Ltd, KRA enforcement officers availed to the Prosecution a letter dated 13th August, 2019 authored by Tabitha Karanja, CEO & 1st accused. The letter was placed on record before Plea Court.
2. The letter confirmed that Tabitha Karanja, the CEO of Keroche Breweries Limited, indeed received the summons issued by KRA.
3. In court, Senior Counsel Hon. Senator James Orengo, confirmed that the Directors were summoned. This was indeed an opportunity for the Directors to interrogate the matter further with KRA.