A corporation; the UK using commerce as a tool of War
& Calhoun as SecState negotiated their occupation of the land
while also working to skyrocket our national debt
28/ Calhoun had to be very stupid to not see what he was doing
So let me revise my above statement: people said AJ thought Calhoun was behind the assassination attempt
Maybe
But as a political rival? Hell no.
But look at it all from THIS angle:
29/ Calhoun
-loved slavery & governance
-helped give a large chunk of land to the British Royal Charter company
-fought vehemently for a National Bank
-Fought to expand the bank & our National Debt
-Pushed us towards civil war
President AJ had a different plan:
30/ So maybe Calhoun did pull some Frank Underwoodian-style machinations
But not to eliminated a political rival
If he did, he’d be serving a higher power
By the way, you know who brokered the Oregon Treaty as a neutral 3rd Party?
Kaiser-Fucken-Wilhelm
31/ Yes the treaty was arbitrated by Kaiser Wilhelm I
Whose son married Queen Victoria’s daughter
A bit of a sidebar, but interesting nonetheless
32/ So let’s look at the President of 2BUS!
There were 3 (& 1 Acting); while I have no doubt they’d all be interesting, we’re looking into the Assassination Attempt on AJ, so we’ll focus on
Nicholas Biddle
2BUS President for all of AJ’s Presidency (which was 1829-1837, FYI)
33/ First thing to get out of the way: he looks like a bitch
Next: we don’t have to look far for British connections:
Biddle was James Monroe’s *Minister to the Royal Court*
🚨So the guy who ran 2BUS while AJ was trying to destroy it
Had direct access to British Royalty🚨
34/ Even as a lowly state Senator, Biddle’s “cause” was the re-chartering of a National Bank
I have to say, if that we’re my STATE Senator had that as their primary mission,
I’d wonder who the hell he was working for. Because it sure isn’t for the people of PA.
35/ Now pay close attention here: remember the Panic of 1819, which made Henry Clay lose his fortune?
Here’s a concise layout of how it happened
Gold & silver - none of that “fiat paper money” bullshit - was snatched up from small banks to pay Europeans
by the National Bank
36/ Funny side story: Biddle’s brother wrote metaphorical checks with his mouth that his ass couldn’t cash
He got into the equivalent of an Internet comment flame war with a journalist
assaulted the journalist while they were sick
Then got killed in a fair fight by the guy
37/ Now, you want to see the fucked-up precedent being set?
Politics for the next 200 years:
AJ hated the National Bank, saying it corrupts our government
Biddle poured thousands of dollars in THE BANK’S MONEY into a campaign to defeat AJ
Are you fucking kidding me?
38/ Remember where our assassin was before the attack?
Philly, where “unnamed persons” prevented him from traveling to Europe
What state did Biddle represent?
PA, born in, lived in, & died in Philly
Graduate of UPenn
I wonder if Biddle knew powerful &/or sketchy people there
39/ Oh, & he DELIBERATELY caused a recession to fuck with Jackson...
Where have we seen that move before?
His BS caused another Panic in 1837, & then he was arrested for Fraud
40/ So we have Biddle
-deployed to the Royal Court
-lived where the would-be assassin was before the attack
-threw the Bank’s money into defeating AJ
-caused the Panics of 1819 & 1837
-🚨deliberately caused a recession in 1833🚨
-Was arrested for Fraud
Epic quote coming up:
41/ President Jackson had a quote that I think spells out the assassination attempt quite cleanly
🚨“The Bank is trying to kill me…but I will kill it."🚨
And he fucking did, & killed the National Debt. What a baller.
I think if he were alive today, he’d also say this👇
/END/
42/ I just found this quote & had to share it:
“Jackson was asked at the end of his presidency in 1837 if he had any regrets. "Yes," he replied. "I regret I was unable to shoot Henry Clay or to hang John C. Calhoun."”
Baller to the end 😂
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Reagan ^ Monroe > Madison(?) > Jackson (who stopped the National Bank & survived an assassination attempt over it, see my awesome thread at the end of this 😎)
3/ That one above Reagan may be Adam’s, actually
No idea who these 3 are. I thought the first one was Truman or FDR but it’s not 🤷♂️
This is something that always bugged me, but now I see it as a more deliberate effort to kill human spirituality
I’ll get briefly into how this may tie into a bigger philosophical battle (which comes down to Tesla vs Einstein, as well as what’s crassly called “Eastern vs Western thinking”)
but I wanted to start with an example that I’ve had with me since the days I was a devout Catholic.
You may know the story of the Fatima Marian apparitions.
The *very* short version:
- the Virgin Mary reportedly appeared to 3 Catholic children multiple times in Fatima, Portugal in 1917.
- Mary met with the children regularly on the 13th of each month, then said to bring lots of people for a final miracle to prove the kids were telling the truth.
- On 13 October 1917 (their story now a huge deal) tens of thousands of people showed up
- It was reported that the sun began to dance in the sky & emit rays of color. Some stories say that - while it was soggy from rain - the sun appeared to zoom towards the earth & dried the ground & the people.
- Mary also reportedly told the children they needed to pray for Russia - this was 6 months before the Bolsheviks performed their massacre in Russia.
The Church didn’t recognize the Fatima events as “supernatural” until 1930.
But the Vatican & its propaganda is a whole other angle - as is the whole subject of Marian apparitions.
I have no opinion on the legitimacy & I haven’t been Catholic for over 15 years.
I want to focus on the skeptics & scientific “explanations”.
There are three types of “explanations”:
- Mass hysteria/seeing what you want to believe
- Looking at the sun caused mass vision problems
- there was atmospheric interference (either from the Sahara or the classic “swamp gases” causing a wavy effect)
I want to focus on this last one, because it - more than anything else - shows just how ridiculous the “skeptical” approach to things is.
So let’s say it was swamp gases or the Sahara that happened to impact the atmosphere.
At that exact time when the kids said a sign would occur.
Now, some skeptics laugh up their sleeve at religious people, & joke about how we’d all be dead if the sun moved all around - or the whole world would’ve seen it.
It boggles the mind just how insanely these people imagination.
If you were to believe in an entity powerful enough to *physically* move the sun, would it be outrageous to think it could break as many so-called “laws of nature” as it wanted?
Again, I don’t have a dog in this fight, but that has to be the STUPIDEST argument I’ve ever heard.
As for the mass hysteria/bias confirmation, I acknowledge that could be possible.
But I want to focus on the “it WuZ SuMtHiNg eXpLaiNaBLe” position.
If the atmospheric disturbance is truly their argument, you know what *isn’t* explainable?
The fact that a massive visual disruption of one of the most constant things in our life (the sun) occurred *exactly* when these children said there’d be a sign that everyone present would see.
Statistically, that timing is damn near incalculable.
But that’s glossed over.
They don’t consider that - if a Deity were to get involved - they might use a method that didn’t involve ACTUALLY moving the entire sun.
Why wouldn’t a Deity actually use natural effects PLUS timing?
If I’m a Deity, & I say “Show up at X at exactly this time & you’ll get a sign” - 10,000+ people then see something insanely rare occur at that time,
… & then some people go “YeAh bUt it wUz the sAhARa”, I’d have to declare them to be massive fucking idiots, or extremely disingenuous.
Kind of like the way some people seem to miss all the different faces Buyden has, or the whole C0VlD & Jab scam.
This leads me to the 2nd problem:
Modern Science’s worship of the Mechanical Universe
2/ Now: how does that tie in with Nikola Tesla vs Einstein?
First: the short answer (make sure you check out the video my good fren @DamonRiddle3 is QTing here):
3/ The nutshell of this is that at the beginning of the 20th century, Physicists had a choice between 2 paths
& THEY CHOSE THE WRONG ONE.
I’m not a physicist, but my understanding is that Einstein basically built upon & “improved” (heavy irony in my use of that word) Newtonian Physics.
For those who also aren’t physics people, you’re in luck: you have this dummy to explain it, dumbly 😂
Newton & Einstein’s physics models are also called “classical mechanics”. It is (as you can guess) very mechanical 😂
It’s good enough that it works with most of the stuff humans need to calculate (*or so we have been told*…more on that later). Supposedly, Newton invented calculus to see if he could measure the moon “falling” towards earth.
But as you get into larger & more abstract calculations, the model falls apart.
And so they have to (literally) MAKE UP constants to plug into their calculations, in order to make the math work.
Just a “we’ll just put this in there & figure it out later”… then proceeded to never figure it out.
(I am *hugely* oversimplifying, of course)
You want to know what one of those “constants” is?
The so-called “Dark Matter”. They literally have NO PROOF that it exists, but they need it to make the math work. (H/T again to @DamonRiddle3 - any errors are 150% my lack of understanding)
[FYI, this *does* connect to the Fatima stuff above - I’ll get there!]
So for the last century, we’ve used math that was “good enough”… but we Peons have been trying to solve a puzzle with half the pieces missing… & it’s not an accident.
I don’t need to tell you that technology (most notably Tesla’s) has been suppressed, as well as anti-gravity tech discovered by the German National Socialist Party waaaaaay back in the 1940s.
(I’ll link to some amazing threads by Mr Wolf & @1FreeInhabitant amazing threads on that subject below as well)