There’s nothing like a 10-point Likert scale to make complete noise seem like scientific results.
Behold, the completely unactionable survey.
I blame Foresee for this. They sell snake-oil-disguised-as-scientific-survey-tool to thousands of unsuspecting product managers who want “data” to prove their decisions were right on.
I found the “consistency of speed from page to page” question to be quite amusing.
Is a 10 the right answer for a site that’s consistently slow?
Remember, even if your data is unreliable and unscientific, it still makes for an awesome PowerPoint chart, especially when you rotate it to look like it’s heading up and to the right.
Let's talk about what early career UX folks should emphasize in interviews, especially when searching for the first job.
A mistake I see folks make is when they focus on the designs they've created. Often these are school or side projects. They look great. They work great.
1/
However, that's not what smart hiring managers care about.
Of course, if you produce crappy-looking stuff, they won't give you the time of day.
But you don't have crappy-looking stuff. That's not what's preventing you from getting that first dream gig.
2/
What's preventing you from getting that gig is that the hiring managers can't see your vector of growth.
You see, it's likely you're not telling your story right. The hiring manager doesn't care about your designs, because, let's face it, they aren't that impressive.
3/
If drug testing was actually implemented like most A/B tests, you’d give 2 drugs to 2 groups of people and pick the “winner” by whichever group had fewer deaths.