NYC politicians have a comically bad understanding of Puerto Rican politics, because most Boricuas in NYC are descended from people who moved from the island during a time when there was a strong independence movement.
The independence movement tries to guilt and shame liberals into thinking they are the popular will. But the truth is, in the last 40 years independence has never polled over 6%. puertoricoreport.com/how-popular-is…

To put that in perspective, 26% of Texans wanted independence in 2016.
The idea that statehood is a "far-right" position is utter nonsense. Yes, Republican-affiliated politicians in PR support statehood, but so do Democratic-affiliated ones, including Gov. Pedro Pierluisi, who was explicitly elected on a statehood platform.
One of the main arguments used by statehood opponents is that it would accelerate colonialist ambitions, because white mainlanders would flock to the island chasing the federal money statehood would bring.

There are several problems with this argument.
First, it isn't supported by the historical evidence of other off-mainland territories that achieved statehood.

Hawaii, for instance, has never had a white majority after becoming a state, and its Native population has grown quite significantly. pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015…
Second, statehood would actually give Puerto Rico much more control of its own affairs, and would allow it to eliminate the loopholes Congress has used to turn the island into a tax haven for wealthy white businessmen, who both pro- and anti-staters seem to agree are a problem.
It's also kind of beside the point, because PR has now voted for statehood in three consecutive plebiscites.

Anti-statehood opponents boycotted the first two, but the third had turnout almost as high as the mainland, so there's really no doubt now the island voted for statehood.
Any politician who really walks the walk about Puerto Rican "self-determination" and doesn't throw around that phrase as a euphemism for kicking the can, should support statehood.

Puerto Rico has a complicated political history, but this isn't a complicated decision.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matthew Chapman

Matthew Chapman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fawfulfan

28 Feb
Going back and looking at it now, it's almost offensive how bad Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam was.
Seriously, like, how do you manage to create a crossover between Mario & Luigi and Paper Mario and provide ZERO fanservice to players from either series?
There's no plot. There's no callbacks or references to anything from either series. The battle mechanics aren't fun. The exploration isn't fun. It doesn't even feel like an RPG, it feels like a bunch of Toad-rescuing minigames with an overworld.
Read 9 tweets
26 Feb
Hey, lady, news flash: "dumb Blacks" KNOW the long history of pre-CRA Southern Dems' friendliness with the KKK and hostility to civil rights.

That's why, for decades, they've worked their way up into leadership positions in the party and reshaped it to center their interests.
This is what everyone who pushes this stupid "plantation" talking point fails to understand.

Black people don't just vote for the Democratic Party. Black people *are* the Democratic Party. They hold key offices. They decide the outcome of our primaries. They write our platform.
Now, does every Black voter think and act the same? Of course not. And if Black conservatives want to argue, we have a right not to have our beliefs profiled because of our race, that's completely fair!

But to claim the majority of Black voters were bought off, instead of...
Read 4 tweets
20 Feb
I keep thinking back to this.

It makes a lot of sense. And it's also a danger sign for Republicans that their overperformance with Latino voters may be very hard to replicate once the pandemic's gone and things start recovering.
It's not an excuse for Democrats to sit back and think nonwhite votes will fall into their laps though. Republicans saw a message opening and they took it. If it's not lockdowns, it could be something else. We need to be in these communities and engaging with voters' needs.
It's often assumed that Trump would have won without COVID. But now I'm not so sure.

He might have done a little better in the Midwest, so WI might have gone red. But I also think TX and FL might have been closer, and Democrats might have performed better in House races.
Read 4 tweets
16 Feb
For anyone who doesn't live in Central TX, let me wrap your head around how insane this is.

I lived in this area from 1992-2003 and then again from 2015-2020. In that ENTIRE TIME, I have seen it snow *twice*, and neither time did it actually accumulate on the ground.
Even six inches of snow in, say, Boston, would shut some stuff down.

Six inches of snow in Texas is a catastrophe. They have no plows. No road salt. Homes and water lines are not adequately insulated. Oil and gas pipelines aren't equipped for de-icing.
And as if all that weren't bad enough, because ground temperature is more stable than air temperature, you have six inches of snow falling on relatively warm surfaces, meaning that the bottom layer pretty much immediately turns to ice. So all the roads are basically undriveable.
Read 4 tweets
16 Feb
Followers, please help @fawfulfanswife. She was a little late to drip our faucets and our pipes are already starting to freeze. She doesn't have a space heater or hair dryer.

Any ideas for how to keep our lines warm?
UPDATE: She has opened every cupboard, opened every tap to a trickle (though most are already frozen), and is going to pour some salt down our drains and wrap the pipes in towels. And that seems to be all we can do for now.
UPDATE 2: Jessica and I realized that we were overlooking an appliance we have that is portable and can warm things: scent warmers!

We're going to try using those.
Read 4 tweets
10 Feb
Everything about @brad_polumbo's argument here is wrong.

First, the vast majority of minimum wage earners are not teenagers — 88 percent of minimum wage earners are over 20, a third are over 40, and most are supporting a family. epi.org/publication/wa…
Second, from a historical standpoint, that's just not the purpose of the minimum wage.

The point is not to set a base salary for career development. It's to keep every fulltime worker above the poverty line. The original lawmakers were very clear on that. historynewsnetwork.org/article/164635
Third, there is scant evidence the minimum wage affects employment much in the first place, teenage or otherwise.

Of course it costs businesses money, but studies suggest that cost comes out of prices or overhead inefficiencies, not hiring fewer workers. businessforafairminimumwage.org/news/00135/res…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!