I'll answer this.

Thread.

1. Censor board doesn't have the capacity to deal with 20000+ movies being produced in India annually. Where will it find the capacity to apply its mind to all the movies being produced for OTT globally? The lag will destroy consumer choice

1/
2. The need is to move from censorship and govt certification to self certification. And more detailed certification than just a rating. OTT streaming services already do this and have norms. If someone violates the law, prosecute them.

2/
3. All streaming is pull content. People are choosing to watch something: not being pushed at them. Norms for broadcast cannot apply here. Not the same thing. You can't treat it the same as TV.

3/
4. Streaming services are very different from public exhibition (films) and TV (broadcast). You shouldn't need to go through such a censor board mechanism for private viewing, if disclosures are adequate. In fact, the govt has said in the past (2015) that it doesn't
4/
...want to do moral policing or ban porn. Then why this heavy handed approach towards streaming services?
medianama.com/2015/08/223-mo…

To quote the attorney general of India then: "The best filter is not to stop it at the gateway of the country, but at the home. If two adults..."
5/
"feel it is entertainment,we cannot be present in everyone’s house.Some kind of self regulation has to be done.That is how it works across most of developed countries. Otherwise,it becomes a totalitarian state. What happens to 19(1)?Tomorrow they will say stop this,stop that”
6/
5. There is no legal differentia in the IT Act between you or me uploading our movie on our site/YouTube/facebook, and Netflix / Hotstar licensing it. How will guidelines that apply to OTT streaming not apply to someone publishing their video online? By size? That won't work.
7/
6. What you're doing is segmenting the internet into types of entities. Streaming services, ecommerce providers etc etc. That will destroy the flexibility for service to innovate. Shape shift. Try new things. For example, how will this segmentation impact

8/
Innovation like Black mirror Bandersnatch? Amazon can use amazon prime video's x-ray to showcase clothes & furniture that users can buy on amazon.com . We don't even know the possibilities. By treating the interactive universe with outdated, blinkered frameworks
9/
That are from a License Raj era, this government is limiting and destroying innovation, and the ability of businesses to create new consumer experiences. We're seeing this with the IT Rules especially, but also expecting with bitcoin.

10/
Lastly, if you want to study all this in more detail, here's @medianama 's complete guide to OTT streaming regulation
medianama.com/2020/07/223-ot…
If India's broadcast censorship code was applied to Sacred Games, this is what it would look like: medianama.com/2019/10/223-sa…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nikhil Pahwa

Nikhil Pahwa Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nixxin

20 Feb
I was on @alexandermats show on ET Now yesterday, to discuss Facebook and Google vs Australia when it comes to News content, and how they've taken different approaches.

The key question: can this happen in India?

A thread 👇

1/
1. What's going on?
A proposed News Media Bargaining Code released by the Australian competition watchdog forces Google and Facebook to enter into arbitration with news publishers to decide a price for News on their platforms.
medianama.com/2021/02/223-in…

2/
Price for Google to surface news. For users to share on FB.

2. Power imbalance: Australian competition commission believes there's a power imbalance between News publishers and social media platforms. This is true.

3. Google has done a deal with Rupert Murdoch's News corp

3/
Read 18 tweets
17 Feb
So, a significant day for us at @medianama today. An especially difficult decision for me to make, since I've always felt a pull from a public interest perspective that information, in order to be effective and usable by a wider group, needs to be open, and accessible

1/
Our goal has always been to help bring about a deeper understanding of the forces shaping the Internet, especially in India, with the mission to foster an Internet that is open, fair, competitive and global.

Our work has provided insight that has helped shape tech policy,

2/
encouraged public participation in policy-making, provided policy & business decision makers with food for thought, been a source for papers, research reports & books, as well as helped journalists at other publications understand what’s important.

3/
Read 7 tweets
29 Oct 20
MEITY, NIC & NeGD, in response to @OfficialSauravD RTI say they have no info on who created Aarogya Setu.
In this thread, I'll connect some dots:
1.Much of this info is in public domain. Then why no official documents? To protect those who built it? Or
(1/n)
to protect bureaucrats who authorised the building of this app by third party volunteers, possibly, without requisite paperwork? List of Aarogya Setu volunteers had been published on Github btw medianama.com/2020/05/223-aa…
(2/n)
2. Volunteers in govt tech: in Aadhaar, some of Nandan Nilekani's team were "volunteers", but via an official process. So much of tech+policy development done by (Nandan linked) iSpirt "volunteers" is officially (govt) undocumented or invisible.
3. Volunteers have a unique+
(3/n)
Read 25 tweets
16 Oct 20
The Indian government has today "clarified" it's position on Foreign Investment in Digital News Media in India.

It is restricting FDI to 26%, in line with print, and not just in media companies, but in news aggregators too.

dipp.gov.in/whats-new/clar…

Thread 👇 (1/n)
1. Govt is positioning this as a benefit. That's incorrect. FDI has been reduced from 100% to 26%. How do we know it was 100%? NewsCorp had bought VCCircle in 2015: medianama.com/2015/03/223-ne… They've now sold it at a loss to Mint, after the FDI policy was announced.
(2/n)
2. This move strengthens the traditional media lobby against digital companies. Traditional media co's had formed a digital lobby group in 2018. This is probably their doing: medianama.com/2018/10/223-on… (3/n)
Read 11 tweets
18 Sep 20
The removal of Paytm and Paytm First Games from the Google Play Store covers two interesting #techpolicy issues:

1. Platform Power: Google and Apple have an operating system duopoly. Remember that you can't upload an app store app on the Google Play Store. Thus
(1/n)
They have the power of the default. It's also an app store duopoly. They leverage this duopoly to control entire ecosystems, and effectively control the app economy of a country. The TRAI Chairman @rssharma has spoken about "platform neutrality". Can they ban apps from
(2/n)
their platform, without repercussions? Of course they can, as a pvt platform. They don't want to enable realmoney gaming & gambling? That's their prerogative. But there's a challenge when apps don't have any other significant options.

2. Realmoney gaming: This is where it
(3/n)
Read 13 tweets
14 Sep 20
Q's you have to ask about the IE story on Zenhua and Chinese profiling of significant Indian folks is:
1. is profiling illegal?
It isn't. Not even as per the personal data protection bill. Twitter does it. Facebook does it. LinkedIn does it. Political parties do it.
1/n
2. Is collecting public data off social media illegal?
It isn't. Much of ad industry is exactly that. Collect data, classify people, target them. But it is surveillance. SC said about Indian govts social media tender: blanket montioring of social media is mass surveillance.
2/n
3. Is identifying/documenting relationships between people using publicly available data illegal?
It isn't. Journalists do this for stories. LinkedIn does it, quite publicly. Social media = behavioral and relational info
3/n
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!