Some context to this. Yrs. ago I was working with a 16 yr old hitter from Nor Cal --a guy who was far too upright [no hip flexion] After 3 attempts to tilt more he said ..."I don't feel comfortable doing this. To which I replied:
Well let's think about this. Imagine you as an infant wherein you see this piece of dirt on a ledge that you want to eat. You try to lift yourself up to try to get to it. After 3 attempts you say ...."I don't feel comfortable doing this."
Well guess what I said. If you gave up after 3 tries ...you would be in a FUCKING wheel chair now !!!
Bottom line: One of THE main reasons hitters I have worked with fail is due to the fact that they are guided by feelings of comfort. They simply cannot get beyond this kind of flawed mindset.
Well let's think about this. Imagine you as an infant wherein you see this piece of dirt on a ledge that you want to eat. You try to lift yourself up to try to get to it. After 3 attempts you say ...."I don't feel comfortable doing this."
As humans we take walking for granted ..but the reality is that it took months of trial/error/feedback ...much of which consisted of FAILURE ...before we actually developed the capacity to take a step and stabilize the the body!!
Another phrase which actually amounts to a cue is the "launch angle."
A couple of yrs. ago I was working with about 40 hitters [14 to 18 yrs old]. I asked them about this phrase. They ALL had heard of it. But. When I ask them as to how exactly a good launch angle is created....
NONE could verbally or physically describe as to how one actually goes about creating a good launch.
They are not alone in this regard.Neither most players or instructors actually understand the underlying physics/physiology that creates a good launch angle.
Yes...I do realize that quite a few instructors/dads THINK they know. But from my vantage point,the empirical evidence suggests otherwise.
Cues vs. reality. The first person that I know made this fundamental distinction was Paul Nyman [around 2001].In that day cues such as "stay inside the ball", "take the knob to the ball"and many more were prominent. Today there are also cues that are actually similar.
One such cue is ...."turn the barrel." This most certainly is a cue in that it simply begs the question of...what does one mean by turn the barrel?
From a biomechanical standpoint, ANYONE swinging creates a curvilinear path of the knob from the start of the swing to contact.
Meaning that the path of the knob/barrel creates some kind of ARC ["move with a curving trajectory"]. Which is essentially synonymous with "turn" ["move in a circular direction wholly or partly around an axis or point"]
About 20 yrs.ago I started talking about numerous heretical notions such as ....good hitters don't swing down, they do not keep their shoulders level, they do not keep their weight back,the hands are not really all that important..etc,etc. The question is:
Who or what influenced my contrarian views? Obviously [for those who know me] Paul Nyman and Jim Dixon were major influences. But even before these guys there were others that greatly shaped how I tried to understand complex subject matter.
One such person is Thomas Sowell. He will be 90 yrs.old today. I first came to know him around 1980. Here he is on the William F Buckley show in 1981:
Griffey showing a damn good ability to create the kind of bat/body alignment from initiation to contact that facilitates a deep contact point:
[go to .17]
Note that at contact the hands have not gone past the lead hip joint. [And yet he has rotated the trunk--hips/shoulders-- pretty fully]. The barrel is at the lead knee. And very importantly the barrel and lead forearm create a single line at contact.
Question: If you placed a tee at the lead knee,how many hitters do you know who could create this kind of bat/body alignment at contact? I suspect---based on long experience ---that very few could.
I've cited this article by biomechanist Patrick Cherveny before --because I think it well states how I view "how the body works" in the context of how elite level athletes load/unload.
"My experiences have taught me of the importance of proximal-to-distal kinematic sequencing and how these elite movement patterns translate to elite loading patterns in the Kinetic Link, which is found in all elite athletes to varying degrees."
And: "The biggest misunderstanding of how the human body performs is the concept that all human motion and loading starts at the ground and works its way up through the body. This is fundamentally not true in elite movement and loading patterns."
Someone asked as to whether or not swing quickness is trainable. It can and it is certainly a large part of what/how why/ I teach what I teach. One aspect of quickness that I do not think is well understood is the STABILITY component.
Stated simply,all dynamic movement is a function of a series of rapid joint interactions in which some joints are mobile and others are very stable [or should be!].
The stability component is critical in that if certain joints are unstable, this can vastly effect the ability to quickly change direction, accelerate the body mass,etc.