If an ultra-sophisticated language algorithm can pass a college writing assignment, that's a sign of a problem, but it's not necessarily a problem with the AI, or the assignment. h/t to @BryanAlexander for the tip on the original article. insidehighered.com/blogs/just-vis…
When @BryanAlexander sent me the original article, I thought I would have a very different take, that I would be either skeptical of the AI or critical of the nature of the assignments. Neither turned out to be true.
The AI (GPT-3) is pretty freaking amazing, like how Deep Blue was amazing when it beat Kasparov. Language AI couldn't do what GPT-3 does until GPT-3 did it. The seemingly impossible is suddenly possible.
But it's important to note that the algorithm did not ace the college assignments. It passed them. The reason it passed them is the thing we need to look at more closely and it's wrapped up with how we assess writing.
Thinking about nostalgia for childhood books, but also the need to move forward, does anyone else remember the "Great Brain" series? I remember loving them as a kid. I was going to write a column recommending them to today's reader, but then I read one and decided better.
For one, the book has outright anti-Mormon sentiment that reads like bigotry to me. The author, John D. Fitzgerald moved to Utah and lived as a non-Mormon among Mormons, and had some resentments, but it's not a sentiment I can stand behind.
Many of the problem in the Great Brain are also settled by actual fighting where "haymakers" are thrown, and it's pleasurable to see the bad guys get their comeuppance, like when Jack Reacher takes care of business, but these are kids books.
Thorough and interesting discussion of what higher ed is facing at this moment, and I don't say that just because it discussed my book in some detail. chronicle.com/article/can-hi…
I'm classified as one of the "utopians," which is fair enough, though I'd call myself a realist in that within the article's taxonomy, the utopians are the ones who advocate for the necessity of structural change to shift the status quo.
The author thinks that the most important reform institutions should pursue is a focus on delivering quality and meaningful instruction. That's at the core of my argument. I attack the structures of the institution because of how they stand in the way of that.
You know, come to think of it, my friend and co-author @kevinguilfoile had our book, "My First Presidentiary: A Scrapbook of George W. Bush" "cancelled" because of politics back in 2001. Hear me out. amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg…
The book was a rather gentle parody of GW Bush, released right around the inauguration in 2001. It sold reasonably well, was a #1 Washington Post best seller, a campus best seller, and was a nice little success story.
After 9/11, every single remaining copy, 10's of thousands of them, were returned from bookstores to the publishers because it was decided, sensibly, that the public appetite for a parody of the president in the aftermath of a terrorist attack on American soil was limited.
Arguing that well-resourced private universities should give money to less-resourced public ones is a clever frame for an argument, but of course, the real solution is to end the favorable tax structures for wealthy privates and put the money in publics. chronicle.com/article/what-w…
Collecting taxes from the wealthy and distributing it to the schools that actually educate most students is what I call for in my book. Look at these disparities. beltpublishing.com/collections/pr…
I get that tax the wealthy and give the money to the public goods that people actually need and use isn't a sexy argument that gets attention or allows me to display my perfect straddling of progressive and centrist takes at my well-paid Substack, but it would, you know, work.
Yesterday, I was among the many folks on here tweeting with some distress over the news that U. Colorado is replacing tenured faculty with NTT instructors to deal with budget shortfalls. I actually have a bit of a different take today. I think it could be a positive step. /thread
This @insidehighered article from the dogged @ColleenFlahert1 provided some very important additional context. Faculty are being bought out voluntarily and those positions replaced with instructors who will teach twice as much. insidehighered.com/news/2020/12/0…
I think this comment from one of CU-Boulder's tenured profs is at the crux of the criticism. Such a move is not consistent with what he (and many) perceive as the mission of a research university.
Succinct summary from @ErikLoomis of what's at play in higher ed right now, particularly public higher ed. It's an acceleration of the trends of the last 30 years, and if we don't act, it could be the end times. lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2020/12/shock-…
I did my best to offer a vision that moves us away from this precipice in Sustainable. Resilient. Free.: The Future of Public Higher Education. beltpublishing.com/products/susta…
In the post at the top of the thread, @ErikLoomis nails the disconnect at work.