Nature doesn't care who gets selected for survival. Evolution has no goal. Another way to describe natural selection is as a process of elimination. Certain individuals survive because they have structural, physiological, behavioral or other characteristics that prevent them..
..from being eliminated. Those that don't have these characteristics are eliminated. Adapting to changes increases the chance that individual will survive, reproduce, and pass along its characteristics to the next gen. Greater resistance to disease, run faster, or learn to Sh$$t
When organisms undergo selection, some characteristic may be carried along that wasn't selected. Even if some trait didn't provide an advantage it could still be carried along as long as it isn't harmful, i.e., doesn't negatively influence survival and reproduction...
But a situation may arise in the future when that trait can become useful or harmful, must be shed as fast as possible if later case i.e. Vasudaiv Kutumbakam, Land of Budha, peace, honey, Gandhi
Characteristics successful in one environment may be unsuccessful in another. This is well expressed by late American paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould in WonderfUL Life: "Even if fishes hone their adaptations to peaks of aquatic perfection, they will all die if the ponds dry up."
Look around, most nature beliefs are dead. World is increasingly moving towards monotheistic belief systems, we are the only last major roadblock & vultures of both variety are circling..Lest we pick up the traits of mad Elephant -crushing things that stand in our way..extinction
John Locke said: "Good and evil, reward and punishment, are the only motives to a rational creature: these are the spur and reins whereby all mankind are set on work, and guided."
We are driven by our need to avoid pain (and punishment) and a desire to gain pleasure (and reward).
Our aversion to pain also encourages a certain human behavior: to take most rewarding view of events. We interpret choices/events in ways that make us feel better. We often prefer to hear supporting reasons for our beliefs; think of ourselves as more talented than others..
More we are exposed to certain experiences, the more the specific connections are strengthened, and the better we learn and remember those experiences. We then use these stored representations ofwhat works when we respond to people and situations. Essentially what we do today..
is a function of what worked in the past. We adapt by learning from the consequences of our actions. We do pattern recognition. Even though we are capable of logic, our brain does not operate by the principles of logic. It operates by selection of pattern recognition...
It's a dynamic network. It's not an "if-then" logic machine. Are we recognising the patterns of what is happening in India and wide world? we are inherently alone, surrounded by hostile populations following Abrahamic Memes save for Nepal, Bhutan & Burma. We are alone
Adapt fast, build strength, keep laser like focus on growing economy, not jump into fights of others, Make these Memes (Abraham's children) fight each other.. Gain strength for a storm is coming.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Brain is formed by life experiences & since an individual doesn't keep doing what doesn't work (learns through trial and error), evolution has reinforced the behavior, values that help us survive and reproduce. This behavior must be the behavior that was adaptive in environment
in which humans spent most of their evolutionary history. The qn then becomes: What was the operating environment in which human brain evolved?
Human evolution started about 5-7 mln yrs ago & today's "modern" human brain appeared on the scene some 150,000 to 200,000 Yrs ago
For most of that time our ancestors lived in primitive hunter-gatherer societies as agriculture evolved some 12-15000 years ago. meaning over 99% of human evolution journey has been as hunter-gatherer & what made our fore bearers survive and evolve?
ਖਾਲਿਕੁ ਖਲਕ ਖਲਕ ਮਹਿ ਖਾਲਿਕੁ ਪੂਰਿ ਰਹਿਓ ਸ੍ਰਬ ਠਾਂਈ ॥:
Creation is in the Creator (God), and the Creator is in the Creation, totally pervading and permeating all places (sggs 1350).
Picked from
ईशा वास्यमिदं सर्वं यत्किञ्च जगत्यां जगत्।
तेन त्यक्तेन भुञ्जीथा मा गृधः कस्यस्विद्धनम् ॥
ईशावास्यं इदं सर्वं
ईश्वर बसा अणु कण मे है, ब्रह्माण्ड में व नगण्य में,
सृष्टि सकल जड़ चेतना जग, सब समाया अगम्य में
Most of the times Neo- Martial Sikhs were busy licking the feet of people sitting on throne of Delhi.. Including the letters written to Aurangzeb + fighting on side of English in 1857.. plenty of Singh Sabhas licking feet of English, wanting to be seen s separate from Hindus
HOWEVER, EVEN TEGH BAHADUR NEVER WAS A WARRIOR AGAINST THE MOGHUL EMPIRE; INDEED, THE BIRTH OF HIS SON GOVIND IN THE EASTERN CITY OF PATNA WAS A SOUVENIR OF HIS OWN ENLISTMENT IN THE PARTY OF A MOGHUL GENERAL ON A MILITARY EXPEDITION TO ASSAM.
At any rate, he stood firm as a Hindu, telling Aurangzeb that he loved his Hindu Dharma and that Hindu Dharma would never die,-a statement conveniently overlooked in most neo-Sikh accounts
Sikhs were such a martial race that they were beaten by Bengal Army twice comprising of 50% Brahmins and Rajputs each from East UP.
Stop this nonsense of Martial race and all.. Rajputs, Marathas, Jats (non-Sikh), Brahamins, Kurmi, Yadav have been fighting Invaders for centuries
Only Sikhs had an empire was under Maharaja Ranjit Singhji & he considered himself a Hindu. Neither before, nor after Sikhs empire. Were busy stabbing each other in back before and resorted to the same post his death.
Rajputs + brahmins taught them to fight & led them along..
If Sikhs were such martial Quam then how they could not protect Dileep Singh from taken away & made a X'tian? Thoo..Shame on the so called bravery if you can't protect and die for your honour. Singh Sabhas were busy licking feet of English instead of fighting to save Dileep singh
Modi ji can keep on giving out facts that we hv purchased Rs49000Cr worth of Daal in 5 yrs vs CONgress purchased 650cr in 5, even Punjab farmers know it, the fight is to stay in village, affording lifestyle guaranteed in law in name of MSP & not slugging in factories..
@nstomar ji, This outsized share of Punjab in FCI buying must be bought down to their share of produce..17% for wheat & 10 odd% for Rice.
Why should poor West Bengal, Karnataka, UP farmer fund the lifestyle of Punjab farmer?
Let me shock u. Avg landholding/household in Punjab is 5/6 acres against a national avg of 2.5acre, meaning double of national avg.
Now Shocking details, 45% of Pujab's rural population are landless, meaning the actual avg of landholding could be 10acres of landholding families
Kissaan as 'Annadata' is Bull manure only. I spent 3 days in the village around Diwali. Almost 80% of the families has a drunkard drinking no less than for Rs300/400/day.
The money is taken on loan from cooperative banks in name of seed/fertiliser, spent on drinking & Motorcycles
Then the farmer doesn't pay the banks, waits for the MLA/MP elections, loan gets wiped off and cycle starts again.
My neighbour was selling the free Rice he got under PDS at Rs10/kg to collector who sells it back at Rs28. imagine 15kg/every 15 days + Daal 2kg/15 days.
I called Vilage Pradhan and asked him is this a unique case? He clarified that almost 70% of the households are selling the PDS Rice/ Daal to shopkeepers.