Nobody likes 'BAME', but how to describe all 'BAME' ppl, not just individual communities where the matter is common barriers, disparities etc. People of Colour (a bit American)? Non-white (negative)? Black as a unity term (old fashioned, embraced less by some communities)? 1/
There's totally an issue with 'BAME/BME/BAEM' hiding even worse stats afflicting some groups, eg ppl of African descent (incl Afriphobia) & Bangladeshi/Pakistani (added Islamophobia). But why can't we use unity terms together with disaggregated data for worst impacted groups? 2/
The danger is losing unity terms because some communities are worst hit by the same issue that's also affecting other communities takes away power from the argument to deal with the underlining causes, fracturing an anti-racist coalition & playing into divide-and-rule. 3/
One problem is that unity terms have lost its' most strident advocates as the anti-racist movement waned, however #BlackLivesMatter analysis was centred around 'political Black' approach even if the word wasn't always used. 4/
Another is that the positive elements of unity terms (celebrating pride, strength in unity) has been eclipsed the negative (victims of racism), and the balance has been lost along with people who would otherwise subscribe to a balanced understanding of such terms. 5/
We used to have the principle that anti-racist action must be Black-led, but what does that mean if we are only comparing which community is worst affected? The very platform for alliance-building with white allies begins to crumble. 6/
The debate around terminology within & between 'BAME' communities is of course important - we need to define ourselves. But it is also a symptom of the combination of data overload on how bad #structuralracism is plus the absence of coalescing around demands for change. 7/
Which brings us back to The Sun. Why are they ditching 'BAME'? I would argue because it's in the interests of the same people who are seeking to turn the clock back to a pre-Macpherson era of a 'few bad apples' to ditch the concepts of institutional & structural racism. 8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This piece is a little confused. Rwanda is indeed an oppressive state, but no mention that it is one of Blair’s favourite African nations (he’s done lots of well-remunerated ‘consultancy’ work for them). Despite the human rights abuses, Kagame was, and... theguardian.com/football/blog/…
...remains a friend of the West, esp Britain. Human rights is about humanity, standards but also consistency - and the latter as always is lacking. In tourism, the piece lambasts Rwanda for handing £30m to a rich club Arsenal, but no real analysis of whether this investment is...
...paying off. If it is, from a financial standpoint it’s worth it. The irony is @barneyronay’s piece may cut tourism thereby making the poor poorer still. Tourism denial as a means of forcing political change has some merits but there has to be a strategy not just an economic...
.#Reparations is an idea whose time as finally come. Even Biden has recognised that now. Justice delayed justice denied. We need to honestly calculate the costs of damage for enslavement and colonialism, and repair it. #Maafa#ReparationsNow
With mainstream leaders like Biden, Obama and, erm, Vince Cable backing the moral case for #Reparations we urgently need a progressive debate to counter two-pronged opposition of “move on” and ‘post-racial Commonwealth / overseas aid counts’ tendencies.
.#Reparations includes, but is more than, a fair trade playing field debt or write-off (it’s already paid). It’s also the legacy of anti-Black racism today manifesting itself in worse job, housing, health & criminal justice outcomes for descendent of enslaved & colonised lands.