This is the article that I have been thinking about writing. Fortunately, John Engle (@AlmingtonCap) spared me the trouble. Effective competition from legacy is finally here and Tesla is losing out in every major market.
To all the Teslemmings who are thinking that #TSLAQ has been "crying wolf" about competition forever, remember: in the end of the story, the wolf actually did show up.
The game changer is that large-scale legacy manufacturers (ie., Ford, VW and Hyundai, not Jaguar) are finally producing cars based on dedicated EV platforms and not just dropping EV drivetrains into existing ICE platforms. This allows them to maximize the benefits of EVs
(slippery aerodynamics, larger interior spaces/frunks, low center of gravity, etc) to help offset EVs inherent disadvantages in range/charging and weight, creating a more attractive "trade off" for traditional ICE buyers.
The other step-change for legacy is that they have finally realized that just because it's an EV, doesn't mean it has to look like it was designed by a bored 12-year-old on the back of a class book. The Mach-E and Ioniq 5 are gorgeous, for example.
The Teslemmings have never understood the lags inherent in new car introduction. They have also been blinded by the crazy $TSLA stock price to the fact that EVs were an unprofitable and niche market that legacy were happy to ignore until regulations (and stock market pressure
) forced the to act. The Teslemmings took this lag as "proof" of sustainable advantage by $TSLA, when in fact it was just a combination of a normal lag (remember: the first Blackberry phone preceded the first iPhone by 5 years, and cars are more complicated than phones) and
legacy indifference to a small and unprofitable market.
Just listened to this podcast with our own @StanphylCap (currently in Twitter jail in a great injustice) and @QTRResearch. Early on, Spiegel is searching for the name of a Goldman leader. The name was John Weinberg, Sr. This brought back a memory.
So now, a la @Keubiko (but without the great graphics), a tale from investment banking.
I joined GS in the mortgage securities dept. One of the first deals I worked on was with GS as a co-manager on a Solly-led deal to securitize a bunch of funky mortgages made by (if I remember correctly) the FDA. It was going to be one of the first uses of the new REMIC law.
1. With deliveries in July/Aug in China of about 22K, the 42K prediction for 3Q requires 20K in Sept. Hard to believe without some channel stuffing. 2. Prediction of 50K for China in 4Q seems high. The "honeymoon" effect points in the opposite direction. Maybe more new stores?
3. Europe in 3Q seems about right and certainly consistent with shipping schedule, but does assume that all the cars shipped get sold - which is not true at the moment (I believe). However, I see no reason why Europe should increase by 10K in 4Q. No new models. More comp.
Have reviewed the qtly Tesla presentation and read the technobabbling transcript. My general reaction: nothing has changed.
A thread.
Profits and gross margin still dominated by EV credit sales. Still virtually no disclosure on these sales. How they can increase with sales basically flat (and down dramatically ex-China) is a mystery. The associated A/R is sus.
Positive FCF driven by working capital and SBC. The latter, as I have often commented, should not be considered "operating" but rather "financing."