Welp.
All it turned out to be was a dictum to be created then exploited.
It was exploited.
A sucker is born every minute.
All it turned out to be was a dictum to be created then exploited.
It was exploited.
A sucker is born every minute.
Dalenius’ desideratum sounds like a dictum to be used as an exploit of personal privacy data, by using it as the basis for defending the collection, aggregation and analyses of same for the purposes of developing weaponized propaganda as a political tool.
What 'q-anon', is:
"an exploit of personal privacy data, by using it as the basis for defending the collection, aggregation and analyses of same for the purposes of developing weaponized propaganda as a political tool."
~ @Redrum_of_Crows
"an exploit of personal privacy data, by using it as the basis for defending the collection, aggregation and analyses of same for the purposes of developing weaponized propaganda as a political tool."
~ @Redrum_of_Crows
Dalenius’ desideratum, in essence, explains how to legally defend and explain away the use of personal privacy data obtained by aggregating 'bits'; logically relating them; identifying individuals.
Results can be used for 'targeted messaging/psychologic manipulation'
'q-anon'
Results can be used for 'targeted messaging/psychologic manipulation'
'q-anon'
Another paper by the author of the q-anon paper referenced above: 
ABSTRACT
q-anon and Facebook Interface
I'm sensing a bit of a pattern, here.
MINING 'INFERENCE" from PRIVATE DATA
.@threadreaderapp unroll it all..
Let's pretend we want to 'mine' MESSAGE BOARDS for ANONYMOUS DATA to aggregate and deduce inference; where might be a great place to begin?
How about a place that links 1,000 MESSAGE BOARDS?
How about a place that links 1,000 MESSAGE BOARDS?
You have no idea just how vulnerable you are in so many ways...
Or, you could just go direct to FACEBOOK and get the data then manipulate the USERS since that's where the biggest impact can be realized.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
