🆚: BREAKING NEWS: The scandal regarding the secret, 20-person "war council" at Trump International Hotel the night before the insurrection just went—well—international. There's now significant evidence that Trump's team sought aid from a key foreign ally. sethabramson.substack.com/p/brazils-murk…
(PS) As most of you reading this know, the "🆚" icon is used on this feed whenever I'm linking to a media outlet (for instance, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, or the Daily Beast) that is offering the linked-to content "via subscription" (in this case, just $5/mo.).
(PRIOR REPORT) If you want the background on the burgeoning insurrection-related Trump-Brazil scandal—the first signs of it, which led us, inexorably, to today's new revelations—it is available at PROOF in a free-to-all article from February 6, 2021: sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-maj…
(NOTE) So I just came across a few more stunning details relevant to this story—the location of Beck's plant in Brazil (guess where) and social media posts from Eduardo Bolsanaro that are *very* telling—and added them to the story, which at this point is one heck of a wild beast.
(UPDATE) I already have new info on this subject I'll include in my next PROOF article. The article will do something no media outlet has done before with respect to the insurrection: establish, with proof and in great detail, what Trump expected and wanted to have happen on 1/6.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I very much agree with the decision made by Dr. Seuss Enterprises. I also first learned about imagination, as a child, from TO THINK I SAW IT ON MULBERRY STREET. It's a book that requires the removal of one square of image/text to keep publishing. I wish that would be considered.
(PS) I'm not sure I've ever encountered a book as useful for teaching imagination to young children as that book. It absolutely should no longer be published with that square of image and text in it. But Dr Seuss enterprises does have the authority to remove that image and text.
(PS2) As I understand the situation, the offensive content—unquestionably offensive—is the yellow coloration of a character and use of the word "Chinaman." My understanding is that if the yellow were removed and the phrase "man from China" inserted, the book could be published.
In the last five years of following Maggie Haberman, I've never once seen her distinguish between the word "journalist" and the word "reporter." When she does that for the first time, this journalism professor—who teaches 25 genres of journalism—will take her expertise seriously.
The four principles that govern responsible reportage are objectivity, accuracy, transparency and honesty. When you overuse anonymous sources, continue using sources after they've lied to you, and engage in access journalism, you violate the latter three of these four principles.
I encourage people to read widely about 21st c. journalism. This semester I'm teaching a course on the subject at UNH, so I know how complex, subtle and thorny the topic is. Anyone selling you a line about how journalism works that sounds like it came from 1950 should be ignored.
(THREAD) I'm publishing, at PROOF, excerpts from my NYT-bestselling 2019 book Proof of Conspiracy that detail the murder of Jamal Khashoggi. This content is for subscribers for PROOF. Reader discretion is advised, due to the violent nature of the content. sethabramson.substack.com/p/part-i-addit…
I continue to be amazed that it is not universally understood that Donald Trump is a domestic terror leader
Trump is not, now, chiefly identifiable as a former president, a businessman, a private citizen living in Florida, the leader of a political movement, or a prospective criminal defendant in various financial crimes cases
He is a domestic terror leader and he will act accordingly
Just because Trump's American insurrection is slower-moving than prior insurrections in America or many insurrections worldwide does not make it any less of an insurrection or Donald Trump any less of a domestic terror leader—and media better start understanding this immediately
(PS) It's a weird day for anyone who read Proof of Conspiracy. Many Americans are learning about CSMARC for the first time today—even as readers of Proof of Conspiracy read a chapter with that title in Summer '19. If media thought this was important, it should've covered it then.
(PS2) Media should never ask why it is losing popularity when it has spent the last four years attacking a person who wrote about today's breaking news a year and a half ago. The question media *should* be asking is, why did we put our hatred of this guy over doing our damn jobs?
The Steele dossier remains one of the most lied-about items of the whole Trump presidency. Republicans lie about Steele's background, motivations, knowledge, funders and claims. They lie about the dossier timeline and they lie about its provenance and they lie about its accuracy.
We must also understand that it's no surprise that Republicans lie about the dossier. When the author of a dossier tells you in advance that 30% of it is likely inaccurate, as long as you lie about him telling you that and claim he didn't you can spend years pointing out the 30%.
Steele is an honorable man who had been a valuable FBI partner for years when *Republicans* approached him to try to keep Donald Trump from the presidency. When the GOP folded and accepted Trump as its Lord and Savior, a law firm hired Steele to continue his overseas work.