1
بسم الله والصلاه والسلام على رسول الله وعلى آله وصحبه ومن اهتدى بهديه إلى يوم تُطْوَى السماءُ كطي السجل للكتاب.

MARRYING TWO WIVES IN THE SAME DAY.

This thread was triggered by the viral tweet/broadcast of BBC hausa where a man was explaining how he
2. arrived at the decision to marry his 2 wives in the same day came to play. He mentioned somethings that aren't true by claiming the following:

1. That Allah gave the order to start with 2 wives in the very first attempt.

2. That marrying 2 wives in a day is Sunnah.
3. In as much as it (marrying 2 wives at once) is permissible in ISLAM but there are still some issues that needs to be cleared for the purpose of others who would seek to emulate him in this cause.
To make a short caption for this I say:
4.

1. The verse in suratu Nisa Q4 vs 3 does not command this act. Rather it states the permissibility of marrying more than 1 wife for he who has the means and feels the necessity to do so.

2. In my wide research which I hope to be proven wrong if I am,
5. I have never come across a narration where the prophet Married 2 wives in the same day. It was also never narrated - على حسب اطلاعي القاصر - where any Sahaba did that and the prophet affirmed it.

These would have made it the acclaimed (SUNNAH).
6. Bcos, Sunnah is what the prophet either did, say, affirmed for one who did it or suggests it

Then, I have also never heard of one who did that act amongst the first 5 generations after the prophet SAW. If it has happened I would be glad to know since I was unable to see such
7. So in all honesty the act of marrying 2 wives in the same day is permissible (Jāiz) in Islam for the some reasons:

1. No verse of the Qur'an or hadith either ordered it nor prohibited it.
8.
2. Since no clear context prohits it, it is taken to it's original state which is permissibility not compulsory.

Scholars of Usulul Fiqh will say:
الأصل فى الأشياء الإباحة حتى يأتى دليل صريح صحيح قطعي الثبوت فى النهي يصرفها عن إباحتها..

@almujtaba70
9.
3. Marrying 2 or 3 or 4 wives in at once is logically same with marrying 1 and adding to it till it gets to 4 (If there is mutual agreement between all parties involved).

For these reasons scholars - despite not witnessing it before - didn't term it HARAM,
10. rather they said (MAKRUH) = A disgusting act.

How did they arrive at the verdict (MAKRUH) ?

For the fact that it can be a way of denying one of the wives (Mostly the 1st wife) her rights.
11. A man is supposed to spend 7 straight nights with his first wife immidiately after the Aqdu Nikāh if she is a young girl (بِكرة). And if the wife is an old woman (ثيبة) 3 days.

On this basis scholars draws that the first wife is being denied her rights.
12. Again, should both of them agree that there should be an interchange /shift, like the husband spends the day with the Aisha today and spend the night with Zainab then tomorrow they interchange, it is said that the husband has not spent the needed time with both wives.
13. This in itself might be the beginning of jealousy when one will start to feel he loves the other more than her simply because she doesn't know what he is doing when he is with the other wives. (Speculations).
14. Since it's a matter scholars have no dispute over it let's hear from one or two sources:

قال الإمام يحي بن أبي الخير العمراني ، رحمه الله :
" ويكره أن تزف إليه امرأتان في ليلة واحدة ؛ لأنه لا يمكنه أن يوفيهما حق العقد معًا ، وإذا أقام عند إحداهما .. استوحشت الأخرى .
15. فإن زفتا إليه ، فإن كانت إحداهما قبل الأخرى .. أوفى الأولى حق العقد ثم الثانية ؛ لأن الأولى لها مزية بالسبق ، وإن زفتا إليه في حالة واحدة .. أقرع بينهما ؛ لأنه لا مزية لإحداهما على الأخرى " انتهى من " البيان – للعمراني " (9/520)

Yahya Al-Imrāniy Said in his book "Al-bayan":
It's despicable/disgusting to wed 2 wives for him (husband) in one night (same day), because he can't give both their rights of marriage at the same time. Should he stay with the first one, the other becomes bored and lonely.
Should one marry 2 wives in a day, and one comes before the other, he is expected to fulfil the rights of the first one (completion of 7/3 days) then he will turn to the other one for her own days.
This is because the first one has the grace of being first wife.
Should the Nikāh happen at the very same time, he should Make a pool / throw a dice for them to choose who takes her days first, because there is no grace of firsting anyone, they are both equally deserved.
By translation to this Man on BBC hausa interview, since he has no right to declare who is the first wife or not, since the first Nikāh so slated for 12:00pm and the other for 2:00pm, then the 12:00pm automatically becomes the first wife.
She should be accorded her 7 straight nights (young girl) before the other

Other scholar has a broader explanation which Is Ibn Qudamah
He said:
يُكْرَهُ أَنْ يُزَفَّ إلَيْهِ امْرَأَتَانِ فِي لَيْلَةٍ وَاحِدَةٍ، أَوْ فِي مُدَّةِ حَقِّ عَقْدِ إحْدَاهُمَا؛ لأَنَّهُ لا يُمَكِّنُهُ
أَنْ يُوَفِّيَهُمَا حَقَّهُمَا، وَتَسْتَضِرُّ الَّتِي لا يُوَفِّيهَا حَقَّهَا وَتَسْتَوْحِشُ .
فَإِنْ فَعَلَ ، فَأُدْخِلَتْ إحْدَاهُمَا قَبْلَ الأُخْرَى ، بَدَأَ بِهَا، فَوَفَّاهَا حَقَّهَا، ثُمَّ عَادَ فَوَفَّى الثَّانِيَةَ ، ثُمَّ ابْتَدَأَ الْقَسْمَ .
وَإِنْ زُفَّتْ الثَّانِيَةُ فِي أَثْنَاءِ مُدَّةِ حَقِّ الْعَقْدِ، أَتَمَّهُ لِلأُولَى، ثُمَّ قَضَى حَقَّ الثَّانِيَة
وَإِنْ أُدْخِلَتَا عَلَيْهِ جَمِيعًا فِي مَكَان وَاحِدٍ أَقْرَعَ بَيْنَهُمَا وَقَدَّمَ مَنْ خَرَجَتْ لَهَا الْقُرْعَةُ مِنْهُمَا، ثُمَّ وَفَّى الأُخْرَى بَعْدَهَا
It is detestable/hateful/dislike/disgusting to wed 2 wives for him (husband) in one night (same day), or in the period of the stay with the first wife, because he can't fulfil the rights of any of them, and the one cheated would be hurt and lonely.
If it happens anyway, he should give the first 7/3 days to the first wife and then come back to the second for her days too. Then he will begin to interchange/share days.

If the second wife was wedded during the period of stay with the first wife (in the first 7/3 days),
the man will complete the nights with the first wife before coming for the second wife for her nights.

If the marriage was done in the same venue/time, he should throw a dice and the winner takes the title 1st wife hence, getting the first nights 7/3, then the other follows.
See : Ibn Qudamah in Almughniy, Vol 7 page 242.

By translation,
1. this man is practicing a MAKRUH (detestable/dislike act) but not Haram.

2. He should take note of how he accord the both wives their first 7 nights by giving the first complete 7 nights to the one of 12:00pm
then the following 7 days becomes for the second automatically.

Disclaimer: I am nobody in this affair (Fiqh) and will never claim to know anything here.

But I opine that if the both wives are wedded in the same venue/time,
they should be given preference to make their choice of who takes the first seven days. And this should be decided even before the date of the marriage is set.

Remember, there must have been an understanding and contract between them already
for them to have come that far to agreeing for the marriage to go on in the same day and time.

This will help to lessen the jealousy the second wife will feel while the first wife is being served her Rightful 7/3 days

Just an opinion which can help but not compulsory on anyone
I decided to do this so that girls/women and Men should know the rules of whatever contract they sign before they sign it.

May Allah reward us for what we said right and what we said wrong may he forgive us...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ustādh Tasiu A. A. 🔴

Ustādh Tasiu A. A. 🔴 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TasiuAl

13 Dec 20
1 أعوذ بالله من الشيطان الرجيم
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
وصلى الله على النبي الكريم وآله وصحبه أجمعين ...
اللهم إنى اعوذ يك أن أَظلم أو أُظلم فإنما الأعمال بالنيات

A THREAD ON MIRACLE (KARĀMAH) OF AULIYA' AND A COUNTER ANSWER TO THE FOOLISHNESS OF @KhaleepaITK
I saw your tweet since Friday but thought you're bemused by ignorance and never wanted to respond but the rising request to do the needful made me come to it today.

1. To start with, the book you are referencing الداعية العالى has been graciously criticised.
Not just written unpublished books but a verbal criticism.
2. The book was not written by sheikh and was written after the demise of sheikh but as usual you must tell the word you are foolish since its about Sheikh Ibrahim Niyass R.A
Read 44 tweets
27 Sep 20
THE EXCELLENCE AND DISTINCTIONS OF SHEIKH TIJANI R.A
الفضل والكرامات لشيخ التجانى رضي الله عنه
اعوذ بالله من الشيطان الرجيم
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

وصلى الله على النبي الكريم وعلى آله وصحبه وأولياءه أجمعين.

#Maulud
#SheikhTijani Image
Today, we join everyone to celebrate a hidden treasure of Allah, a honourable gnostic, the seal of auliyāu, the pole of Sufism, Maulana Abul Abbas Sheikh Ahmad At-tijaniy R.A

It is of much importance we do this kind of remembrance to ourselves because it was said:
فبذكر الصالحين تتنزل الرحمة
With the remembrance of the pious mercy pours
A lot of us would want to hear the Distinctions (miracles) that Allah endowed our blessed sheikh with and I know we are waiting to hear he turns stones to gold, or raise the dead or even caused one to die.
Read 45 tweets
26 Sep 20
OK, it seems you don't know why I said you are confusing me. Clearly, your tweet which I quoted translates opposite of what the hadith you are quoting relates.

Hadiths are more than an ordinary English translations.

Do hold on while I explain to you

1. Your tweets translates as (Protection and catering for) no longer a purpose for marriage.

One thing you missed here was that, those 2 things were never reason for marriage, they were mere rights of a wife over a husband. Anybody who sees them as purpose is mistaken
2. The hadith you mentioned in Buhari was narrated by Abu Musāh as part of the signs of end time. Even though scholars fault the hadith I don't want to talk about that.

But what the hadith was translated to be was that ladies will later come to hang on men seeking for marriage
Read 9 tweets
24 Sep 20
ACCEPTANCE OF A WEAK HADITH AMIDST (WIPING OF THE FACE AFTER DUA A SUNNAH)
اعوذ بالله من الشيطان الرجيم
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
وصلى الله على النبي الفاتح الخاتم وعلى آله وصحبه ومن حذا حذوه إلى يوم زلزلت الأرض زلزالها...
Thread
Throughout yesterday, tweets about rubbing the face were flying over my TL and even though I never wanted to say anything about it as it originates from an ignorant source.

What triggers me to this thread today is the say around the Hadith of Ibn Umar that whenever the
prophet SAW raises his hands for prayers he usually don't drop them u til he wipes off his face with it.
The antagonist to wiping of the face after dua have no proof to their claim unless that some certain mallams (Ibn taymiyyah and Ibn Uthaymeen) said there are hadith's narrated
Read 36 tweets
17 Sep 20
LAWS GUIDING MUSIC (AL-GINĀU) IN ISLAM.
أعوذ بالله من الشيطان الرجيم
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
وصلى الله وسلم على سيدنا محمد وعلى آله وصحبه ومن قفى قفوه إلى يوم تبلى السرائر

Muslims have for a long time argue over things that are not necessary, things that are never part

Thread
of what Allah is going to ask a servant or what a servant will not be asked in his grave.
The most despicable thing is for you to see Muslims pronounce Haram and Halal on things Allah and His messenger never pronounced it to be Not minding the fact that they have no legal/moral
right to pronounce Halāl or Harām alas Allah and His prophet didn't do so
Allah says:
وَمَا كَانَ لِمُؤْمِنٍ وَلَا مُؤْمِنَةٍ إِذَا قَضَى اللَّهُ وَرَسُولُهُ أَمْرًا أَن يَكُونَ لَهُمُ الْخِيَرَةُ مِنْ أَمْرِهِمْ ۗ وَمَن يَعْصِ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ فَقَدْ ضَلَّ ضَلَالًا مُّبِينًا
Read 72 tweets
16 Sep 20
Salam Alaikum. We've said it time without numbers that you should leave religious posts for those that have the knowledge. I am not here to correct you, the other time we wanted to discuss this you couldn't respond you ghosted and I hate that.

(Atbāu Tābi'een not Atbāu Tābi'un)
(As-Sa'adiyyu not Si'diy)

I know you heard from your scholars that its haram drawing from the verse you referenced but if your scholars were to be here I would give them references to check in the Qur'an, then take them to hadith.

You guys like condemning whatever you wish
(Al-gināu) is not generally agreed upon to be haram, some are of the opinion its permissible (Mubāh) some are of the opinion its detestable (makruh) while some are that its haram.

You can't just come and be shouting haram and halal as if you are the custodian to them
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!