To all those who keep repeating that #Armenia’s army was equipped with obsolete weapons, here's a profile of a country’s armed forces equipment by date of entry into service. Keep reading the thread to see which army it is. These are the in-service equipment most used today.
1/8
Army:
Service weapon: 1964 (variant introduced in 1991)
crew-served weapon: 1977
troop transport vehicle (ground): 1983
combat service vehicle (ground): 1982
battle tank: 1980
infantry fighting vehicle: 1981
armoured personnel carrier: 1960
artillery: 1963
MRLS: 1983
2/8
tactical transport helicopter: 1979
attack helicopter: 1975
Air Force:
Five multirole fighters: 1973, 1978, 1977, 1996, 2006
Two bombers: 1955, 1986
utility helicopter: 1970
combat helicopter: 1982
airlift and transport plane: 1995
3/8
Air Force:
Five multirole fighters: 1981
airlift and transport plane: 1974
7/8
Stop blaming the "lack" of modernity of 🇦🇲’s weaponry for the outcome of the war. 🇺🇸 spends the most on their military in the world, more than the next 13 combined, and uses equipment of the same era as ours. Weapons didn’t lose this war, @NikolPashinyan inept command did.
8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@NikolPashinyan has been PM of #Armenia for 3 years.
Gov. Of 🇦🇲 is in charge of military procurement.
Pashinyan also largely replaced the military leadership over his term.
Pashinyan cancelled previously established procurement deals & replaced them with useless (SU30) purchases.
Here are my questions.
If we had obsolete weapons that made us lose the war, why would Pashinyan cancel the established contracts to modernize them?
If it was the generals' poor command that lost the war, and it was Pashinyan who named them, doesn't that make him responsible?
If our army was in such poor shape, why did Pashinyan boast of its strength and readiness after the July clashes? If AZ was able to load up on military equipment between July and Sept, and our situation was so desperate, wouldn't it be smart to do the same?