#SadarPranam to Ishvara within you @AudreyTruschke !

By your logic Islam should be most narrow political ideology, isn’t it? As even Laden cited Quran while declaring Jihad over USA.

Point to be noted is that Osama always used Islam as cause.
Only a stupid would say that -tva(ness) is narrower & -ism greater. -Ism is all about singularity whole -tva(ness) is character: a state to be something. Here: state of being Hindu.

Dear @AudreyTruschke which fool taught you that -ness is narrow & -ism better?
Damn the Brits like u were fools who ended up adding -ism to word “Hindu”, for they couldn’t get it that a faith can be so pluralistic.

They thought Hindu Dharma too be as dogmatic as Christianity.
And they passed Affidavit bringing in term “Hindu+Ism”.

Dear @AudreyTruschke the foolish British either didn’t understand our Dharma or they didn’t know their own language : English.
It seems an oxymoron when one says ,”Hinduism” is pluralistic. Can ever an idea like Feminism or any other -ism be pluralistic?

It’s addition of -tva which gives meaning to word “Hindu”.
So “Hinduism” is a reminder of “White Foolishness”. Whenever we say it we are making fun of those imperialist whites for they either didn’t understand :
1)Own language
2)Hindu Dharma

Dear @AudreyTruschke , I‘ve clarified all the issues around Hinduism & Hindutva in this thread

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳

Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Aabhas24

26 Feb
1/n #SadarPranam to Ishvara within you @ShashiTharoor ji.

Look at this other side of Abul Kalam. (In this thread). This is Islamist shade.

Let me begin with his speech on
27/10/1914 (Kol):

“One momin for another momin is like one brick assisting another brick in a wall.+
2/n ... This biradri (community of Muslims) has been established by God…All relationships in the world can break down but this relationship can never be severed.”

He further says:
“It is possible a father turns against his son, not impossible that a mother separates...+
3/n ... her child from her lap, it is possible that one brother becomes the enemy of other brother. But the relationship that a Chinese Muslim has with an African Muslim, an Arab bedouin has with the Tatar shepherd,... +
Read 5 tweets
14 Jan
No. I’m not sitting on twitter at ease like you guys. You see, even without tagging you come searching like how a per goes behind bone with smell.

I cited the name randomly without citing proper journal. I gave proper name when I was home.
Like a cheap troll @Farid_0v you didn’t care to read the journal as it would have come through permission through library.

That apart I also cited “Old Book of Tang” & explained how it’s academically accepted fact that Chinese saw Quraysh to have evolved from Tayyaye.
But no, like a typical Islamist sadakchap troll , @Farid_0v you kept showering Ad hominem.

You following same age old tactic of trying to hound me instead of coming of level playing ground by reading books. You want everything free ! Shameless spineless Islamist!
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!