@Firebird_psych@Gaea56998567@SimoneMesk@claudius_cruz@sarah__lenard@bairdjulia@smh@theage "Research showing that women commit high rates of intimate partner violence … against men has been controversial because [intimate partner violence] is typically framed as caused by the patriarchal construction of society and men’s domination over women" (Supra, p. 36).
@Firebird_psych@Gaea56998567@SimoneMesk@claudius_cruz@sarah__lenard@bairdjulia@smh@theage This study found "that among relationships with nonreciprocal violence, women were the perpetrators in a majority of cases, regardless of participant gender… [and] …both men and women reported a larger proportion of nonreciprocal violence perpetrated by women…" (Supra, 944).
@Firebird_psych@Gaea56998567@SimoneMesk@claudius_cruz@sarah__lenard@bairdjulia@smh@theage "Lower-bound estimates were calculated by counting only those violent behaviors that both partners reported or agreed on. Upper-bound estimates were formed by counting violent occurrences that either partner reported, whether corroborated or not" (supra, pp. 1703–1704).
@Firebird_psych@Gaea56998567@SimoneMesk@claudius_cruz@sarah__lenard@bairdjulia@smh@theage This 1998 study was authored before it became clear that women were as violent as women, in fact, are (which took further research—such as above—to demonstrate) and the actual raw data supports, in general, greater amounts of domestic violence perpetrated by women against men.
@TheMightyV24@GretaAurora@SeagerMJ You cite _Half the Sky: Turning Oppression into Opportunity for Women Worldwide_. The figures in that work of "[w]omen and girls are killed specifically because of their gender." includes sex-selective abortion (nytimes.com/2009/09/08/boo…).
@TheMightyV24@GretaAurora@SeagerMJ There is a compelling reason for those sex-selective abortions: survival of the parents in old age. Boys are future Social Security cheques.
“The Chinese traditionally have valued sons over daughters, depending on their sons to support them in old age” (jstor.org/stable/189961?…).
@TheMightyV24@GretaAurora@SeagerMJ “Sons are permanent members of their natal families and retain life-time contractual relationships with their parents. Throughout their lives, they are expected to contribute to the economic well-being of their parents” (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…).
In general, men (regardless of age) seem to have a preference for women in their young 20s (advances.sciencemag.org/content/advanc…, p. 2) so it is not surprising that women in their 40s would find it difficult to find men who are attracted to them.
@therealmissjo When men reach their peak earnings, men can afford to start a family. Men need to outearn their wives for stable relationships, unfortunately.
@therealmissjo The problem is, in part, that men have to develop high enough steady earnings to date who they want and have a stable relationship with that woman.
Please support the Stop the Wait Act (H.R.4386) to eliminate the 5-month waiting period that now applies to the payment of certain Social Security Disability Insurance benefits for workers and surviving spouses
(congress.gov/bill/116th-con…).
Please support the Stop the Wait Act (H.R.4386) to eliminate the 24-month waiting period that applies to Medicare coverage for workers who are eligible for Social Security Disability Insurance benefits
(congress.gov/bill/116th-con…).
The marriage equality described in this tweet happened once for homosexual couples and homosexual rights advocates took it away and I don’t see it ever coming back for anyone ever again.
Supplemental Security Income is welfare and I don’t see how the justification to the average working person is going to be made that said working person should pay welfare to a family making 6 figures which regularly happened when this was last tried.
Under the presidencies of William Jefferson Clinton; George W. Bush; and Barack Hussein Obama, II; a fair amount of antihomosexual bigotry fueled the passage of The Defense of Marriage Act (1 U.S.C. § 7; 28 U.S.C. § 1738C; 110 Stat. 2419; Pub.L. 104–199; govinfo.gov/.../PLAW.../pd…).
@heatherpeno I never said I knew more or less than you.
I have asked you for citations to support your assertions and to explain the relevance of some of your assertions, both of which you have demonstrated incapable of doing.
Maybe you are just incapable?
@heatherpeno ...and @heatherpeno blocks conceding and demonstrating that she cannot support her assertions or explain the relevance of some of her assertions to the original conversation (