@heatherpeno I never said I knew more or less than you.
I have asked you for citations to support your assertions and to explain the relevance of some of your assertions, both of which you have demonstrated incapable of doing.
Maybe you are just incapable?
@heatherpeno ...and @heatherpeno blocks conceding and demonstrating that she cannot support her assertions or explain the relevance of some of her assertions to the original conversation (
). Well, wouldn't that require @heatherpeno to provide supporting citations to demonstrate her superior knowledge.
@heatherpeno I provided citations supporting my position, but it was just too much labor for @heatherpeno to demonstrate her superiority by providing citations for (or even explaining the relevance of) her comments. I guess @heatherpeno failed at "establish[ing I] have zero fucking Knowlege."
@heatherpeno Next @heatherpeno states that "Not only [am I] trying to claim [the] authoritative position on the subject matter [I] have not first hand experienced it and [I] refer people that have to third parties like AN IGNORANT" (
A psychopath is defined as "a mentally unstable person" and, particularly, "a person having an egocentric and antisocial personality marked by a lack of remorse for one's actions[ and] an absence of empathy for others" (merriam-webster.com/dictionary/psy…).
@heatherpeno I imagine that someone who flies off the deep end when asked for the sources upon which she relies is not the picture of mental stability. This would be particularly true of someone trying to protect imaginary people from imaginary and undefined threats. Whom does this describe?
@MichaelGLFlood Maybe Australia is some patriarchy where men have all the power, but that isn't true in the United States. The United States is trying to do something similar and there are good reasons why a council or ministry for men and boys would improve society.
@TheMightyV24@JonesApathy@FoaChris@DianaWintah You have made this argument before (archive.ph/Ggii9), but, @TheMightyV24, you still haven't explained why was it necessary for the study you cited then to excise 5/6s of the data regarding men to show that women "receive much longer sentences than men."
@TheMightyV24@JonesApathy@FoaChris@DianaWintah "Gender Differences in the Sentencing of Felony Offenders" cited by @TheMightyV24 showed that if numbers are manipulated enough (by taking a random sample of a sixth of the male convicts and compare it with all of the female convicts), women could be shown getting treated worse.
@TheMightyV24@JonesApathy@FoaChris@DianaWintah Consider, instead, Sonja B. Starr's "Estimating Gender Disparities in Federal Criminal Cases," University of Michigan Law and Economics Research Paper, No. 12-018 (August 29, 2012) (available at papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…) showing that women get shorter sentences (when prosecuted).
@UKLabour I agree that violence is a human rights violation ― full stop.
Domestic violence does not appear to be as gendered as you portray it to be, @UKLabour, but let's look at the data, shall we.
@UKLabour Consider "Intimate terrorism by women towards men: does it exist?" by Denise A. Hines and Emily M. Douglas published in July 2010 in Volume 2, Issue 3, of the _Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research_ (available at www2.clarku.edu/faculty/dhines…).
@UKLabour "Research showing that women commit high rates of intimate partner violence … against men has been controversial because [intimate partner violence] is typically framed as caused by the patriarchal construction of society and men’s domination over women" (Supra, p. 36).
@CarolineGatti3@SeptimusSulla@Suffragentleman@UN_Women "Research showing that women commit high rates of intimate partner violence … against men has been controversial because [intimate partner violence] is typically framed as caused by the patriarchal construction of society and men’s domination over women" (Supra, p. 36).
@CarolineGatti3@SeptimusSulla@Suffragentleman@UN_Women "The results of this study indicate that the adherence to the theory that patriarchy is the foundation of [intimate terrorism] in Western, developed nations deserves reconsideration."
2 Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research 54 (2010).
@melliflora@RestlessZoomer@Untega@MyUteri “Sons are permanent members of their natal families and retain life-time contractual relationships with their parents. Throughout their lives, they are expected to contribute to the economic well-being of their parents” (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…).
@SocialWorkerLSW, you just repeated your prior claim regarding the pay gap without producing any supportive evidence to back up your claim after your claim has been refuted with evidence from left-leaning, centrist, and governmental sources.