.@SenatorDurbin says at today's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Vanita Gupta's nomination that JCN's ad stating Gupta wants to defund the police is "patently false."

You need look no further than *Gupta's own words* to see that Senator Durbin couldn't be more wrong. /1
During testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Gupta called for leaders to heed calls to “decrease police budgets and the scope, role, and responsibility of police in our lives.” /2
Gupta: “While front-end systems changes are important, it is also critical for state and local leaders to heed calls from Black Lives Matter and Movement for Black Lives activists to decrease police budgets and the scope, role, and responsibility of police in our lives.” /3
More Gupta: "That means not just changing policing practices, but shrinking the footprint of the criminal legal system, including police." /4
Gupta continued: "...it means shifting our approach to public safety away from exclusive investments in criminalization and policing, toward investments in economic opportunity, education, health care, and other public benefits.” /5
If what Gupta has said isn't the very definition of calling to defund the police, I don't know what is. /6
.@SenCruz presses Vanita Gupta on her claim under oath today that she does not support defunding the police, reading her own testimony on the subject from last June back to her. /7

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Carrie Severino

Carrie Severino Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JCNSeverino

18 Feb
Meet Vanita Gupta: The liberal extremist nominated to be associate attorney general.

We’re not even one month into the Biden administration, and he's already rolling out the red carpet for left-wing dark money groups and their radical agendas./1
Gupta is a liberal activist with strong ties to Arabella Advisors, which funnels hundreds of millions of dollars to far-left dark money groups, including The Leadership Conference, which she led. /2
Vanita Gupta is anti-law enforcement, anti-religious liberty, and supports packing the Supreme Court.

She wants to defund the police, but believes prisons should be forced to use taxpayer dollars to pay for hormone treatments for transgender inmates…the list goes on. /3
Read 5 tweets
4 Feb
.@FreeBeacon is reporting that a coalition of left-wing dark money groups has formed under the umbrella "Unrig the Courts," with one of its main objectives being to pack the Supreme Court. /1
freebeacon.com/courts/left-wi…
This comes shortly after the announcement of Joe Biden's sham "Bipartisan Commission on Court Reform," supposedly tasked with "studying" the same. /2
This has all of the indicia of what @SenWhitehouse would describe as a "shadowy cabal."  

Will @SenWhitehouse dig in and "follow the money" behind these conspiring groups?  

Will he and @SenSchumer send letters demanding that these groups disclose their donors? /3
Read 4 tweets
28 Jan
This weekend marks the 15th anniversary of the confirmation of Justice Samuel Alito.

He has been an eloquent voice for the Constitution over the last 15 years, and #SCOTUS has been better for it. (1/X)
#SCOTUS has never been more protective of religious freedom in its history. Justice Alito’s consistency and leadership on that issue made that possible. He wrote the Court’s opinions in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014) & Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru (2020). (2/X)
In Our Lady of Guadalupe, which held that courts can’t second-guess a religious school’s determination as to who should teach religion, the Court adopted the standard he laid out in his prescient concurrence eight years earlier in Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC. (3/X)
Read 6 tweets
17 Dec 20
.@SenWhitehouse has anointed himself the unofficial arbiter on judicial independence and so called "captured courts"—or at least when it comes to judges appointed by Republican presidents. /1
But when his best friend, Rhode Island District Judge Jack McConnell, pens a partisan op-ed railing against DACA (litigation about which, by the way, is currently ongoing), it's nothing but crickets from Senator Whitehouse. /2

providencejournal.com/story/opinion/…
Is anyone really surprised? This is the way it always is with Senator Whitehouse.

"Judicial independence for thee but not for me."

"Dark money for me but not for thee." /3
Read 6 tweets
21 Oct 20
The numbers are in.

It’s clear that Americans want Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, and they do not want to increase the number of justices on the Court. /1

int.nyt.com/data/documentt…
But if Joe Biden wins and the Democrats take the Senate on Election Day, we can be certain that they will make packing the Supreme Court a high priority. /2
If the Democrats succeed, they will pack the Court with liberal justices who will use the Court as a vehicle to implement their liberal policy positions.

Just like the Left wants, Supreme Court justices will look a lot more like politicians than judges. /3
Read 4 tweets
15 Oct 20
This week, the country had the opportunity to get to know Judge Amy Coney Barrett.

They got to hear from Judge Barrett in her own words, and see firsthand what an incredible Supreme Court justice she will be. /1
Senate Democrats were relentless this week in their quest to get Judge Barrett to weigh in on their campaign issues, and signal how she would approach cases that might come before her. /2
But through hours of questioning, Judge Barrett proved herself to be unflappable. She was continually gracious and poised as she patiently explained that she could not, in the words of Justice Kagan, provide a "thumbs up or thumbs down" on Supreme Court cases as a nominee. /3
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!