But Matt, by your standard we would never discuss racial inequity at all for fear of upsetting white people. Why not use the race/class combo framing of @IanHaneyLopez and get at both issues. You are throwing in the towel on solidarity altogether so as to pander to white racism..
I wrote a book on this, Colorblind, which shows why class centric, race-phobic messaging actually doesn't work the way many think. It never has. And in this case it is once again telling POC to be quiet about their issues so we can attend to the needs of Joe Sixpack...
And yes, I agree that @IanHaneyLopez doesn't advocate front loading with race, but showing the interest convergence of race and class. But it seems like you really want to avoid race altogether, which is both morally and strategically absurd
The idea that white folks support universal programs of uplift so long as they don't see them as redistributive ignores that for 50 yrs they've been told all such things are, and they believe it...
and the right knows they can push those buttons and make them think it again...so the race frame will be there, like it or not. White folks don't like universality BECAUSE it is universal and they think POC are undeserving...
only when you pretty much cut POC out of programs altogether or limit their participation (as with New Deal programs, Social Security early on, FHA, etc) do they rally behind them...
We can't just finesse that. The right made ACA viewed as racial handout FFS...not bc Obama spoke of the racial aspect (he did not), but bc the right can make any such effort seem like a handout to POC...
Progressives have to confront that manipulation openly, which is what @IanHaneyLopez is discussing it seems: focus on how the right plays upon white fears and uses these buttons to shut down solidarity...
But that doesn't mean we don't talk about the racial equity benefits of public policy too. It just means we do what @hmcghee discusses, meaning the interest convergence of those things for all. Maybe you agree and I'm reading you wrong here...
But it's exhausting seeing folks act as though the problem with getting progressive policy implemented is Black and brown folks and white antiracists talking too much about racism, rather than white racism itself, which those same critics have zero ideas about addressing

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tim Wise

Tim Wise Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @timjacobwise

8 Mar
1/ If you bash cancel culture & scream about free speech but support states/school districts banning material they deem influenced by Critical Race Theory (or really anything that says racism has been a central feature of U.S. history--an inarguable truth btw), you're a fraud...
2/ A committee in NH just passed out a bill to do this. One proponent of the bill cited a lecture of mine being used in some classes as the reason why. What was the offending material that hurt this snowflake's feelings so much? Let's see. He cites three points in the lecture...
3/ First, he was mad bc I said, "Rich white people telling working-class white people that their enemies are Black and Brown...That's the whole history of America." Well, it's true. That's been a constant since the colonies...
Read 14 tweets
6 Mar
1/ If you need proof that racism harms white folk too, just consider the trajectory of COVID deaths and what it tells us...
2/ In April of 2020 when whites had only been 30% of C19 deaths, and headlines announced disproportionate Black death rates, the administration and the right demanded opening everything back up, ending lockdowns, etc...
3/ Coincidence? Of course not. If the data had shown disproportionate white death (or wealthy death, or younger folks dying or healthier folks), no way are people clamoring for "getting back to normal" or showing up at rallies with guns and camo, screaming about 'tyranny...'
Read 7 tweets
20 Feb
There is a stunning lack of analytical sophistication among much of left Twitter, which causes their loudest voices to grossly overstate support for progressive/left policies. As someone who supports those policies it pains me to say this but it's true...

A THREAD
2/ These folks excitedly point to survey data showing broad support for M4A, for instance, or other left priorities & say "see, the people are with us!" and thus, the reason we don't get those things passed is "big Pharma money" or other corporate money buys off the lawmakers...
3/ This is incredibly simplistic on multiple levels. First, NO lawmakers would actually vote against what the people in THEIR district supported if they believed those people were actually going to vote, money be damned. They wouldn't commit political suicide for PAC money FFS...
Read 32 tweets
18 Jan
That any conservatives would today praise MLK is evidence of the failure of our school system to teach him accurately, or the utter venality of those conservatives. Not ONE movement conservative supported King while he was alive. They detested him...

(a brief thread)
2/ The National Review — the main organ of the movement — condemned the civil rights movement he led and actually claimed “crazed Negroes” might have bombed the 16th St Baptist church in B’ham themselves, just to cast aspersions on sweet little segregationist whites...
3/ No conservatives or right wingers marched with him. And please, don’t say “but Charlton Heston!” That was actually when Heston was a liberal, so...
Read 7 tweets
16 Jan
1/ I’m not one for ‘told ya so’s but in 1989 when David Duke won the state House seat in Louisiana, some of us said this was an inflection point in American politics. This wasn’t just the logical result of Reaganesque racial dog whistling. It was something different (a thread)...
2/ It wasn’t even George Wallace, strictly speaking, though it was closer to that than Reagan. It was the blatant introduction of racist appeals under the guise of mainstream conservatism, and w/a polish and media-savvy Wallace lacked, as had most previous white supremacists...
3/ Duke knew how to use media. He cut 30 minute infomercials in his Senate run in 1990 — unheard of at the time — to slowly lay out his politics of racial resentment, knowing it would find a home w/white folks angered by previous GOP scapegoating of welfare, etc..
Read 19 tweets
7 Jan
1/ A few thoughts re: the increasingly accepted (and somewhat obvious) wisdom that "if the people who stormed the capitol had been Black they'd have been beaten or shot." This is true, so far as it goes, but too simple, in a way that MINIMIZES the power of whiteness in America...
2/ Don't misunderstand, I'm glad whenever white folks begin to see this kind of thing, and we all start somewhere. But there are at least 3 levels at which leaving it with the above argument minimizes the issue of systemic white supremacy (not just privilege)...
3/ First, to say "if they'd been black they'd have been beaten or shot," ignores a key element of white supremacy: the mentality of white entitlement, which led them to think they could do what they did w/o consequence in the first place...
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!