- no grey matter volume change in controls
- volume *loss* w/ placebo/psychosocial tx
- volume *increase* w/ meds
3/
The authors found no evidence to support confounding factors and therefore concluded that antipsychotic medications "prevent or perhaps even reverse" illness-related volume loss, consistent with a possible neuroprotective effect of 2nd generation medications.
4/
This is a crucially important finding that adds evidence to an important longstanding question/debate.
What's especially interesting is that in the clinical trial (Francey et al 2020), psychosocial interventions were non-inferior to meds.
However, in this imaging part of that same study, volumetric increase associated with APD treatment was correlated with greater clinical improvement, at least in the first 3 months.
6/
Previous studies have shown that in uncontrolled studies, *volume loss associated with antipsychotic treatment* is also associated with *improvement* in cognitive symptoms.
Taken together, these findings suggest that antipsychotic medications work and do NOT cause "brain shrinkage."
In fact, they might protect against those effects during the early phase of psychotic disorder.
8/
Several caveats are worth mentioning... Foremost, there were no significant differences in brain volume change at 12 months, suggesting that these may be short-term effects that converge with time.
9/
Second, I made a number of relevant comments about the Francey et al (2020) trial in FEP related to diagnostic uncertainty and antipsychotic dosing. See here:
Finally, the findings must also be reconciled with the seemingly contradictory RCT data of Voineskos et al. (2020) who found that APDs were associated with volume reduction compared to placebo in psychotic depression.
This commentary by Weinberger is also essential reading before entering any debates about structural MRI findings and their association to antipsychotic medication.
But bottom line = the idea that antipsychotics (especially 2nd generation) "shrink" the brain is NOT supported by controlled evidence in first-episode psychosis.
There IS good evidence that volume loss occurs and is caused by the disease process. And yes, I said "disease."
Harrow et al. have published another study demonstrating an association between antipsychotic treatment and poorer outcomes compared to non-antipsychotic treatment, this time for both schizophrenia and affective psychosis.
2/
To date, no RCT (no, not even Wunderink) exists to address potential causality or more precisely *direction* of causality. The million $$ question is whether antipsychotic discontinuation leads to recovery or whether recovery leads to discontinuation.
Harrow often uses baseline prognosis as a proxy of severity to address this question, but the only thing that really matters is *actual* disease severity. Why were meds stopped?
This is a chicken-egg issue as I discuss w/@awaisaftab here:
A few points worth discussing. First, addiction as disease is a counter-narrative in response to the:
"prevailing nonscientific, moralizing, and stigmatizing attitudes to addiction [that framed it as a] moral failing or weakness of character, rather than a 'real' disease.
3/
"This argument was particularly targeted to the public, policymakers and health care professionals, many of whom held that since addiction was a misery people brought on themselves, it fell beyond the scope of medicine..."
Finally got around to reading and really enjoyed this new paper by @JasperFeyaerts et al. that offers a critical view of traditional conceptualizations of delusions and the (mis)assumption of a delusional continuum.
It affirms my view that firmly distinguishing between delusions and delusion-like (and shared) beliefs is ultimately doomed, because we do not have coherent existing definitions of "delusions" nor for that matter "beliefs"
Here are my favorite quotations from this paper:
3/
"Jaspers... points towards the experiential context within which primary delusions originate. Whereas delusion-like ideas arise in intelligible ways from everyday experience, primary delusions develop... as "a transformation in our total awareness of reality."
I've been enjoying a moment of political apathy, resting on the laurels of a @JoeBiden@KamalaHarris victory, while doing my best to ignore Trump's bluster which can't hide the reality that he's been deflated & will be put to rest like so many Halloween decorations.
2/10
Last night @StephenAtHome compared Trump to herpes, suggesting that we'll likely see him "blossom" and reactivate from time to time like an annoying cold sore outbreak.
And yeah, maybe he will actually run for re-election in 2024.
But Trump aside, what will probably not go away is the myth that the election was stolen. Trumpers & GOP pols will likely perpetuate the myth as a rally cry "seeding for future social polarization & division on a scale America has never seen."
This @TheAtlantic article by @olgakhazan is a good synopsis of the seemingly unfathomable popularity of Trump and his policies that the left still can't wrap its head around.
Arlie Hochschild's quoted words echo @JonathanMetzl (who's also quoted):
"[White men's] economic prospects are bad & American culture tells them that their gender is too. So they’ve turned to Trump as a type of folk hero, one who can restore their sense of former glory."
ECT has been demonized for decades (thanks Miloš Forman) despite it being one of the most rapidly effective interventions in all of psychiatry, often when previous interventions are not possible or have failed.
2/12 Yes, ECT is a serious intervention requiring anesthetic support and medical monitoring. Memory loss is a common side effect and is sometimes long lasting.
But that must be balanced against the life-threatening nature of persistent severe depression and catatonia.
3/12 Some object to the basic premise of "electrocuting" the brain, but don't question the routine life-saving practice of electrical "shock" for cardiac resuscitation.