I've been enjoying a moment of political apathy, resting on the laurels of a @JoeBiden@KamalaHarris victory, while doing my best to ignore Trump's bluster which can't hide the reality that he's been deflated & will be put to rest like so many Halloween decorations.
2/10
Last night @StephenAtHome compared Trump to herpes, suggesting that we'll likely see him "blossom" and reactivate from time to time like an annoying cold sore outbreak.
And yeah, maybe he will actually run for re-election in 2024.
But Trump aside, what will probably not go away is the myth that the election was stolen. Trumpers & GOP pols will likely perpetuate the myth as a rally cry "seeding for future social polarization & division on a scale America has never seen."
"...the [Dolchstosslegende] myth was not just the sharp wedge that drove the Weimar Republic apart. It was also at the heart of Nazi propaganda, and instrumental in justifying violence against opponents."
"The key to Hitler’s success was that, by 1933, a considerable part of the German electorate had put the ideas embodied in the myth—honor, greatness, national pride—above democracy."
“There’s also a small set of people who acknowledge Joe Biden won, but not nearly as many as you would hope. And there’s a lot of people who are at different degrees of acceptance in between.”
“The dispiriting thing for political scientists looking at 2020 is this isn’t a technical problem... This is a much more complicated problem that has to do w/ the incentives of elites to stoke anger in the American population.
And so, the reality is that while the Trump balloon deflates, he will no doubt continue to do what he does best—fanning the flames of discontent and waging a War on Truth as a rabble-rousing demagogue.
10/10
And sadly the GOP will likely continue to embrace the modern day Dolchstosslegende myth, perpetuating the idea that Biden victory was a fraud and delegitimizing his Presidency in the process as they did with Obama, to further their Populist/Nationalist/Authoritarian cause.
This @TheAtlantic article by @olgakhazan is a good synopsis of the seemingly unfathomable popularity of Trump and his policies that the left still can't wrap its head around.
Arlie Hochschild's quoted words echo @JonathanMetzl (who's also quoted):
"[White men's] economic prospects are bad & American culture tells them that their gender is too. So they’ve turned to Trump as a type of folk hero, one who can restore their sense of former glory."
ECT has been demonized for decades (thanks Miloš Forman) despite it being one of the most rapidly effective interventions in all of psychiatry, often when previous interventions are not possible or have failed.
2/12 Yes, ECT is a serious intervention requiring anesthetic support and medical monitoring. Memory loss is a common side effect and is sometimes long lasting.
But that must be balanced against the life-threatening nature of persistent severe depression and catatonia.
3/12 Some object to the basic premise of "electrocuting" the brain, but don't question the routine life-saving practice of electrical "shock" for cardiac resuscitation.
A conservative FB friend posted this #COVID19 "study," claiming that it "pretty much confirms that asymptomatic people are not contagious" and that wearing masks is unnecessary.
The language in the report is highly ambiguous, but it seems to be an anecdotal description of exposure to a single asymptomatic person w/o even describing how that person was deemed to be (+).
Could the individual have been a false (+)? What kind of contact occurred?
3/6
Reading through the brief report, it boggles that mind that it was accepted for publication to this @ElsevierConnect open access journal (@fake_journals?).
I would have torn it to shreds had I been a reviewer.
Rapid publication/preprints during COVID is a real problem.
The short summary is that the spike protein that it uses to enter human cells is similar to that of #SARS_COV_2 (the original one that resulted in the 2002-2003 SARS epidemic), but has differences that actually seem to make it LESS of a good fit.
3/13
So basically, it doesn't make sense that scientists hoping to make a bioweapon would fabricate something inferior to what already exists.