Inflationary Risk Factors:

Mild inflation 2-3%
Transitory inflation (3-4%) lasting 2-6 quarters
Robust inflation 4-6%
Deflation (real) -1%
Dis-inflation 0-1%
Stagflation +6-8% + rapidly rising unemployment
Hyperinflation +10-20%

Those are my definitions of various 'Flations

1/
Inflation is in the news again, but not for the reasons you might believe.

It has little to do with nominal real inflation, less to do with actual real inflation, and nothing to with rates.

I suspect it I partly a political stunt. More on this below.
2/
I have been criticizing how BLS, Fed + Wall Street measure inflation for a long time.

The predictions about it have been consistently bad, often terrible.

ritholtz.com/inflation/

3/
Economists tend to undercount inflation when its rising, ignoring food and energy, because "Core"

They overcount it when its not rising.

In the pre-GFC 2000s I called this "Inflation Ex-Inflation." If we do not count that which is going up in price, there is no inflation!

4/
We measure housing backwards:

Pre GFC, Rising house prices reduced demand for rentals, lowering Owners Equivalent Rent (OER), the home price model that lowered CPI as prices rose

Post GFC, falling home prices/rising rentals marked as disinflationary.

ritholtz.com/2005/05/how-ho…
5/
It is not just inflation: We wildly undercount productivity IMO, we fail to fully capture GDP, we undercount the under-employed, etc.

It is not only economics: Finance does a poor job measuring intangibles like patents, processes, IP, etc.

6/
Which leads me to the recent nonsense about inflation expectations. This is less a finance/economics argument than it is a political scare tactic.

The Inflationistas return was a back door attempt to thwart Biden's giant $1.9T Covid relief plan + any future stimulus plans.

7/
The return of the Inflationistas is a back door attempt to thwart the giant $1.9T Covid relief plan and any future stimulus plans. The deficit argument failed, the pork claims went nowhere, so this is all they have. It failed, too

8/
I was not a big fan of the $2 trillion 2017 TCJA, primarily because a pro-cyclical stimulus was unnecessary.

Note those tax cuts, which mostly went to the top 30%, did not cause inflation. And that was during a hot economy that was getting hotter.

9/
3rd Covid Rescue plan goes primarily to the lower 60%, who tend to spend whatever free cash flow comes their way.

We already have supply issue and spot shortages, which can send prices higher. Hence, why I expect transitory inflation as that $1.9T gets spent.

10/
Employment is still deep in a contraction. The massive underemployment issue from the GFC is still with us, made worse by Covid. This plan will do those folks good.

In 2022, political opponents will use inflation fears as their defense, but we know today its bullshit.

11/
I'm curious if same nonsense gets trotted out for the Infrastructure bill -- we can fund a long overdue massive rebuild with cheap 50 year bonds (4%?) bring America's highways, bridges, tunnels, airports, electrical grid into 21C.
Or Green New Deal

ritholtz.com/infrastructure/
12/
Look at who is warning about inflation: Its many of the same crowd who warned the Fed about about hyper inflation in 2010.

How'd that turn out?

ritholtz.com/2010/11/dubiou…

13/
I suspect the hyper-inflationists were wrong because of their priors - they simply could not escape their ideology, a belief that inflation was always and everywhere a monetary phenomena.

I believe they were - more or less - honestly wrong

14/
Today's inflation fear-mongers are not motivated by rising prices.

They need a defense for an already popular program - before the 1st check is even printed. This is what happens when you lack of a valid belief system, and do not believe in governing.

15/
We will know over the next 12-24 months how far inflation will rise, how short / long it will last + whether it a big problem - just by watching employment and wages.

The inflationistas will howl about everything else. Just ignore them

END
Arggh, Tweetstorm typo!

Nominal or Real inflation, not "nominal real inflation,"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Barry Ritholtz

Barry Ritholtz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ritholtz

3 Mar
"If you were prescient enough to buy a 1954 300SL new for $7k MSRP + locked it away, it would fetch ~$1.4 million today. Annualized return of 8% before inflation, storage + maintenance.

Most funds performed better + required zero oil filters."

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
To say nothing of the inherent Survivorship Bias in looking at the cars that did appreciate: Selecting investments after the fact is easy; ask yourself this question: What car do you want to buy as an investment for the next 60 years to be sold in 2081?

ritholtz.com/2018/08/surviv…
This is why I have always been a big believer in buying what you like, and driving it (like you stole it).

ritholtz.com/2020/11/my-gar…
Read 7 tweets
4 Feb
$573 Million to settle claims their advice to Purdue Pharma (+ others) led to the aggressive flooding of markets with opioids. It turned out to be damaging, even deadly advice.

Yet another reminder of who consulting giant McKinsey is…

wsj.com/articles/mckin…
1/
Note: A decade ago, I discussed my thesis the consultant always seems to be giving ethically compromised advice that leads to terrible societal outcomes.

Why is that? Is McKinsey & Co. the Root of All Evil ?

ritholtz.com/2011/03/is-mck…
2/
You can even trace the history of wealth inequality in part back to them.

Consider the rise of CEO-to-worker gap. That goes back to a 1951 McKinsey study of CEO compensation and stock options.

ritholtz.com/2013/08/is-mck…
3/
Read 7 tweets
2 Feb
Good explainer as to why Robinhood, an underfunded broker, had to halt $GME trading -- they didn't have the capital to cover the trades

wsj.com/articles/why-b…
1/
Last week, we discussed why your trading platform and B/D looks like a form of Counter Party Risk:

ritholtz.com/2021/01/counte…
2/
And if you want a long form discussion of the history of $GME saga, this one is excellent via @davidjlynch

washingtonpost.com/business/2021/…
3/
Read 5 tweets
30 Jan
US Covid Deaths = 436,839 deaths out of 2,209,277 Global Deaths

USA, once 25% of Covid deaths with only 4% of world's population, has fallen to 19.8% of Covid-mortality.

We suck, just less a little less than we did when the pandemic began . . .

coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html
And please, see if you can avoid making excuses for negligent mass homicide we witnessed in the USA
Here is the USA versus countries that managed their response well and versus others that did poorly: Cumulative confirmed COVID-19 deaths per million people

ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-da…
Read 5 tweets
28 Jan
“Free" offered by for-profit companies must be approached warily for obvious reasons. Free is not without costs. Free has hidden charges, expenses. Free requires you to read the fine print, where buried on page 37, you learn free is very expensive. (2018)

ritholtz.com/2018/10/cheap-…
"In financial services, free is bullshit."
Do you doubt this truism, obvious but overlooked by so many in their rush to pay less? Do you for an instant believe that large for-profit companies price their services at “free” because they are kind-hearted and generous and only have your best interests at heart?
Read 4 tweets
22 Jan
Country 2nd: Faux deficits hawks are shocked! shocked! to (re)discover that the deficit is rising!! via @crampell

washingtonpost.com/opinions/right…

1/
At one point deep int he past, both parties believed all of the the noise about deficits being disastrous. The past 40 years have taught us that obsession was misplaced and the underlying belief is bullshit.

ritholtz.com/2010/07/defici…

2/
We saw this debate after the GFC, when the Austerians won the battle but lost the war.

They crimped the Keynesian response, and ensured the post GFC recovery was the worst on record.

ritholtz.com/2010/06/auster…

3/
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!