SEMI-AUTOMATED OFFSIDE: A THREAD
CAN IT TRANSFORM VAR?
- How it works
- When will it arrive
- The end of the delayed flag
- How it saves the emotional, spontaneous celebration
- What the IFAB says about it
This only fixes part of VAR, as "clear and obvious" remains a subjective problem.
But of 101 PL VAR overturns this season, a THIRD have been for offside.
These are the lengthiest checks, and almost all involve the scoring of a goal.
These should all be removed. Game changer.
And remember, those 101 are only overturns.
Most of the 716 goals scored in the Premier League have had to be checked for offside - to varying lengths of time.
Goals which fans have had to wonder "is this going to be ruled out for offside?"
FIFA set up the Working Group of Innovation Excellence in 2019, featuring representatives from 13 competition organisers around the world, with three primary objectives
- Semi-automated offside
- VAR-lite
- Improved communication to fans.
FIFA's Technical Innovations department has since been working on semi-automated offside.
The first offline tests with limb-tracking and automated ball detection technology were held at the 2019 Club World Cup.
Further trials were held at last month's Club World Cup.
Johannes Holzmuller, FIFA's director of football technology & innovation, said last year:
"The goal is to develop a supportive tool similar to goal-line technology: Not designed to make the decision, but to provide evidence instantly to the referees."
The semi-automated tech trials are driven by ChyronHego, a Sweden-based company using an Emmy Award-winning optical tracking system.
- accurate kick point and ball detection
- tracking using sensor technology and video data
- skeletal modeling precise to tip of a player's boot
Unfortunately, the pandemic has severely affected trials of the tech. The goal remains to have it operational for the 2022 World Cup, but that may be too soon.
Either way, it's unlikely to be available to domestic leagues before the 2023-24 season.
Why is it worth waiting for?
Semi-automated offside will be so important to the fan experience. It will:
- Provide a near-instant decision
- Remove the need for delayed flags by an assistant
- Remove almost all VAR delays on offside
Basically, the fear of a goal being disallowed is all but gone.
Pierluigi Collina, chairman of the FIFA referees' committee:
"We had two matches as a trial during the Club World Cup recently.
"They were very successful but we're still at quite an early stage. But the outcome is clear: It reduces a lot of the time needed for a decision."
That's not to say goals won't be disallowed for offside.
But the VAR will have a decision within around three seconds. That's relayed to the assistant to raise the flag. In most cases, the flag will be up before a goal scored.
No waiting. No line drawing. Instant decision.
The offside tech will tell the VAR that there's an offside offence.
The VAR will judge if this player is active in the move.
The assistant is given a signal to raise the flag for offside, which will usually stop play before it gets the chance to develop.
How will this change the role of the assistant?
Right now, the assistant still has the leading role in every offside not related to a goal/penalty/DOGSO.
Will the tech take over ALL offside decisions? Or only those related to the above, per VAR protocol? We don't know yet.
IFAB technical director David Elleray:
"Will semi-automated offside lead to a removal of the delayed flag for offside? The answer to that would be almost certainly yes."
It should remove the uncertainty that fans currently hate. Is he onside? Can I celebrate? Is it a goal?
Only a foul in the build up, or a handball by the goal scorer, will be a concern.
In the Premier League this season only THREE goals have been disallowed for this via VAR in 275 games with 716 goals.
Almost all offside decisions for goals, penalties and DOGSO would be instant.
Mark Bullingham, CEO at the FA:
"Semi-autonomous offside would be a real step forward. Everyone recognises that the fan experience is negatively impacted by having to wait for the confirmation that a goal has been scored....
"If you have a scenario where you have semi-autonomous offside, where the assistant always knows whether players are offside, they can make an instant decision that doesn't need to be referred, that would be a step forwards. We're always looking to improve the fan experience."
However, one key thing that needs to be resolved is just how good we want this technology to be.
This tech will be more accurate, which actually means it is capable of giving offsides more marginal than we see now.
But Collina is aware that a balance needs to be struck.
Collina: "It will spot all offsides, even smaller than the one we are spotting today with the current technology.
"So it would be more accurate, and ironically we would have more marginal offsides that could be detected.
"It's a matter related to the spirit of football."
There's no doubt semi-automated offside will be a huge improvement to VAR, whatever other issues there are (globally, not just in the UK).
We have to hope Collina's words about the current offside tech are followed up, to remove the unreliable marginal calls we see at present.
Collina on VAR offside with the current technology:
"If the images are not conclusive, then the field decision cannot be overruled. So it is important that what is shown offers something conclusive. Otherwise, I would say, in case of doubt, follow the field decision."
/ends
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Very little VAR-related action this weekend, so a brief thread (by recent standards) based largely upon:
- Burnley v Arsenal
- Brighton v Leicester
However, I've plenty of quotes out of the IFAB meetings from last Friday. I'll do some threads through the week on key topics.
First, possible penalty for Matej Vydra.
Why is this different to, say, David Luiz v Wolves?
Luiz deemed careless by impeding Willian Jose in his running action, but Vydra kicks Bukayo Saka in shooting.
Key: Both decisions made by the ref, so not clear and obvious errors?
This is one aspect of VAR which fans find hardest to understand: that similar incidents can bring different outcomes based on the decision of the referee.
Incidents which will stay with the on-field decision whether the ref has given the decision or not.
Most for: Brighton 8
Fewest for: Arsenal 1
Most against: Liverpool 10
Fewest against: Burnley 0
Most net for: Chelsea, Everton 3
Most net against: Liverpool 5
Most involvement: Man United 15
VAR STATS (cont)
Most goals awarded: Leicester 4
Most goals disallowed: Liverpool 6
Best net goal score: Everton, Sheffield United +3
Worst net goal score: Liverpool -8
FIFA officially lists the 10 most expensive transfers of the window.
1 Diallo to Man Utd
2 Rosa to Man City
3 Haller to Ajax
4 Diatta to Monaco
5 Szoboszlai to RB Leipzig
6 Smalling to Roma
7 Maehle to Atalanta
8 Man to Parma
9 Frimpong to Leverkusen
10 Milik to Marseille
Transfer window takeaways from the FIFA report:
- 2,295 transfers, down 36.2% compared to January 2020
- 395 transfers involving a fee, down 30.5%
- $0.59bn spent, down 49.1%
- Lowest sum of transfer fees to be registered in the January
window since 2014
Transfer window takeaways from the FIFA report:
- The top 20 transfers (by transfer fee) accounted for 58.6% of all spending, with an average spend of $17.2m
- Average spend of the remaining 375 transfers was $646,000
Most for: Brighton 8
Fewest for: Arsenal, WBA 1
Most against: Liverpool 9
Fewest against: Burnley 0
Most net for: Chelsea, Everton 3
Most net against: Liverpool, West Brom 5
Most involvement: Man United 14
VAR STATS (cont)
Most goals awarded: Leicester, Sheffield United 3
Most goals disallowed: Liverpool 6
Liverpool have had more goals disallowed than any team across the whole of last season. Next most this season is Aston Villa and Southampton on 3.
- That Tomas Soucek red card
- Possible Ezri Konsa / John Stones red card
- Possible Arsenal penalty
- Disallowed Burnley goal
It's a long one this week.... Remember, don't shoot the messenger.
First, the Soucek red card. Let's look at how this happened, and the thought process of the VAR, Lee Mason.
While ref Mike Dean has to take responsibility, it's Mason who must shoulder most of the blame.
Mason instigates the review, it cannot happen without his intervention.
A reminder of the wording of the law here on violent conduct.
"A player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible."