🚨SOON: At 12:00 PM ET the House Administration Committee will meet about a petition for the #IA02 2020 congressional race. We'll be live-tweeting the meeting on this thread. Before the meeting starts, get the facts on the situation below⤵️
The 2020 #IA02 congressional race was extremely close after GOP candidate Marianette Miller-Meeks was certified as the winner by 6 votes. Democratic candidate Rita Hart contested the results under the 1969 Federal Contested Elections Act, claiming 22 legal votes were not counted.
Hart filed a petition with the House Administration Committee who oversees contest election adjudication. The committee is chaired by Democratic Representative Zoe Lofgren of #CA19. Miller-Meeks was provisionally seated as the #IA02 representative until the contest is settled.
Miller-Meeks filed a motion to dismiss Hart's petition, making her the permanent #IA02 congressional representative for this term. The meeting today will go over Miller-Meeks' motion to dismiss. You can watch the meeting here👇
🚨HAPPENING NOW: Chairwoman Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) CONVENES Committee on House Administration to address resolution related to the #IA02 contest.
LOFGREN: "Federal law and House rules give this Committee the responsibility to hear election contests...an expected part of the election process."
LOFGREN: "Rather than granting or denying Miller-Meek's motion to dismiss, I recommend we POSTPONE to give the Committee an opportunity to hear the merits of the case."
LOFGREN: "[HART] has raised specific credible allegations…that enough ballots were excluded from the count that may have changed the outcome of the elections."
CHAIR LOFGREN (D): Recommends to POSTPONE the motion to dismiss deposition
RANKING MEMBER DAVIS (R): Recommends to GRANT motion to dismiss
LOFGREN: "Miller-Meeks argues that the Contest should be DISMISSED because Contestee Hart failed to exhaust state procedures before filing notices with the House. However, the House has NEVER dismissed a FCEA petition because the Contestee declined to file a state case."
LOFGREN: "I plan to send both parties a set of identical questions that should control the course of this case, which will be made public."
LOFGREN: "Today, none of us can state with confidence who won this election. It is our obligation to hear hard evidence."
DAVIS: "We already know the outcome of this contest...Miller-Meeks won a free and fair election… the outcome was determined using a transparent and bi-partisan process… She has a Certificate of Election from state officials…I urge the Committee to DISMISS this motion now."
LOFGREN, in response to DAVIS "I believe a dismissal today would be a dereliction of our duty under federal law."
LOFGREN: "I have a record of calling election contests based on the facts. Thats what we're doing here, to find the facts, to search for truth and to act without partisan bias of any sort. We can't do that if we don't allow for evidence to be submitted...."
STEIL (R-WI) SUPPORTS the amendment to GRANT the motion to dismiss contest.
🚨BREAKING: House Republican effort to prematurely dismiss #IA02 election contest FAILS in Committee on House Administration. The contest will continue.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🎓THREAD: College students make up nearly 20 million eligible voters across the country and are often the target of voter suppression, especially students who move to another state for school. Let’s break down the ins and outs of student voting⤵️
✅Starting with the basics: College students can register to vote using their campus address. In 1979, #SCOTUS affirmed in Symm v. United States that blocking college students from using their school address to register to vote violated the 26th Amendment.
The 26th Amendment, ratified in 1971, lowered the federal voting age to 18 and prohibited voter discrimination based on age. Voting laws targeting college students usually incorporate some aspect of age, so Symm fell under the 26th.🗳
🚨ALERT: FIVE GOP Senators have announced that they will NOT seek re-election in 2022. In many of these states, Republicans have already proven they’ll suppress voters in order to win.
See for yourself👇
RETIREE: Senator Roy Blunt of Missouri
For decades, Missouri Republicans have tried to suppress the vote through the enactment of onerous voting ID laws. Take a look at this 2018 lawsuit👇democracydocket.com/state/missouri/
North Carolina is no stranger to bad voting laws. Thirteen different lawsuits tell this story, ranging from Republican challenges to early voting, attacks on vote by mail and aggressive gerrymandering👇 democracydocket.com/state/north-ca…
🚨ALERT: The biggest voting rights case of the term is headed to #SCOTUS TOMORROW, Brnovich v. DNC. Here’s a breakdown of how this Arizona case got started and what’s at stake. THREAD🧵:
This case started in 2013 with Shelby County v. Holder, when Arizona was released from the preclearance requirement and the DOJ/D.C. Federal District Court no longer had to approve changes to their voting laws. After Shelby, AZ started passing voter suppression laws. (1/12)
One law made it a felony to return someone’s ballot, a practice known as ballot collection. Ballot collection is used in Hispanic communities, where activists use it for GOTV drives, and in Native American communities, where it can be harder to access the postal service. (2/12)
🧵WHO'S WHO: Here are the players in Trump's second impeachment trial...
ROLE: The Presiding Officer
PLAYED BY: Sen. Pat Leahy (D-VT)
PURPOSE: Tasks include receiving questions from individual senators and reading them aloud to either the House Impeachment Managers or Trump's legal team.
ROLE: The Jury
PLAYED BY: All 100 U.S. Senators
PURPOSE: All 100 senators, including Sen. Leahy, will serve as the jury in the trial. The senators must sit quietly and remain seated during the trial. That's right—NO phones! The senators will submit written questions to Leahy.