For men out there who feel they should say or do something in response to the justified anger and dismay following the murder of another woman. Speak to women in your life. Listen. Read female writers, academic literature. Visit websites of women's groups.
Donate to charities that advocate for women. That support women. Teach your sons what you weren't taught. Look yourself in the mirror. Recall the entitlement. The objectification. The 'banter'. Bring into your awareness the pornography you stumbled on then actively sought out.
Make amends to women (where it is appropriate and not simply to purge your guilt). Reexamine your sex conduct. Create new ideals for intimacy to which you can aspire. Cut down on porn or stop completely. If you can't, seek support.
Lets not get drawn in by the comforting notion this doesn't apply to us. Resist the impulse to defensiveness. Instead of saying #notallmen just say nothing and sleep on it. Challenging male violence involves challenging ourselves as men - not just other men.
It involves listening to women. It involves taking instruction from better men than us. It involves contending with that discomfort we may feel when male violence and sexual misconduct becomes the focus of public discussion - not running away from it.
For some of us it involves difficult conversations with current or former partners. It involves awkward moments with friends we refuse to laugh along with or them no longer laughing with us. A leap of faith that confronting who we are or were will result in more than shame.
It involves accepting while we may #notall be 'monsters', all 'monsters' were once guys just like us. Honest men know they aren't perfect. Know their capacity to be bastards.Know they could and should have done better. Women don't want perfect men, they just want to feel safe 🙏
I'm sorry if this is not the male response some people want. I just know the work is better done off twitter. Not just on other men, but on ourselves. There are clearly systemic issues that make male violence likelier. These are significant and require political action.
In awful moments like these, when women die and others speak out, two types of men emerge - those keen to convey they 'get it' but lack self awareness, who think its about other men and insecure defensive men who feel personally attacked and vilified.
A man who knows himself shouldn't feel satisfied by his own tweets, whatever group he falls into. A man should feel nervous, tentative and apprehensive to add his voice here, but having reflected and concluded his motives are true, should speak out - and accept the consequences x
I don't know much and what I do know I learned from compassionate, forgiving women, honest, self aware men and from making mistakes i came to regret once I knew better.
Its also worth suggesting that even where your intentions are noble, not all women will agree with the sentiment. Some will push back. They may see it as you making about men. This is OK. Don't let that become an excuse to spit the dummy or to retreat to all male message boards.
Take on board what you must and incorporate that into whatever you say or do going forward. This is an issue I've tried to remain in tune with despite times when my opinions did not feel welcome. When my ignorance betrayed me. But that criticism was something I sat with.
I processed it and came to realise that expecting women who live in fear of male violence to also remain completely cognisant of my male preferences for discourse around it was a subtle kind of entitlement. A lack of empathy. An absence of patience.
These words im writing now I've felt and held back for so long. So afraid to get it wrong. So afraid of punishment and condemnation. So afraid of opening old wounds. Now I see that as men we must speak up in spite of those fears so long as we do for the right reasons x
(And get at least two women to proof read your fucking columns about anything related to gender, feminism and violence against women as standard)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In Morgan’s formidable estimation, Markle is an unscrupulous liar, a Machiavellian manipulator and a covert narcissist – defects of character which would make the top-line of any psychological evaluation of Piers.
If you examine his body-language as he is taken to task for his opinions, his demeanor is consistent with that of a person wounded. The defeated posture. The excruciation at being told a hard truth. Morgan fled the GMB studio in a desperate bid for emotional refuge.
It had nothing to do with his ‘principles’. Nothing to do with ‘free speech’. I can think of no man on this meanspirited backwater of an island who feels more empowered to speak quite as freely as Piers Morgan clearly does.
I don't think he quit. I think he was given the option to make it look like that. I think he was....cancelled.
40,000 complaints to Ofcom in less than 24 hours. Right wing press looking totally isolated in its reverence of the Windsors. ITV already had its corporate knuckles rapped after the role the Jeremy Kyle show played in the suicide of a guest.
The broadcaster tries to capture every demographic to maximise market share and ad revenue but creates for itself irreconcilable ethical issues. Its promoting a mental health awareness initiative while giving Morgan permission to run roughshod over guidelines on mental health
Institutions large and small will always produce what they were designed to produce. Britain's biggest problem is that the Institutions by which it defines itself are based on a concept of Britain that no longer exists - if it ever did at all.
The Windsors are an institutional byproduct. Racism is an institutional byproduct. The attitudes that tolerate this are institutional byproducts. Look at the front page of the Daily Mail for a clue as to how institutions behave when they feel threatened.
People losing their shit because an abtract idea in which they've become emotionally enmeshed is coming apart under the duress of truth. I don't grudge anyones guilty pleasure, but they are protecting Andrew while throwing a mixed race child under the bus.
Trump has no guiding philosophy - just self interested instinct. Experience tells him by following it he will succeed at anything. Coincidentally, his instincts are perfectly calibrated to illicit a Liberal response that illustrate precisely how useless liberalism has become.
Even if Biden scrapes a victory, that it was so close in the first place, would represent the latest in a catalogue of failures of this vaccuous orthodoxy. Beneath Trump's disordered vulgarity lies something different in the eyes of many disillusioned Americans.
They want globalisation reversed. They want jobs back from overseas. They want less foreign meddling. And they want liberals who despise them for it to be repeatedly humiliated. Trump provides a sense that all of these things are occurring simultaneously.
Perhaps the sorest aspect of Corbyn's downfall is that it came down to accusations of racism - the definition of which the left has expanded in recent years. A lot of the intersectional concepts introduced to political discourse or cosigned by the left became its ultimate undoing
You had a lot of people resisting antisemitism accusations in a manner they themselves would deem unsatisfactory in any other case of racism. That they themselves would insist was just evidence of 'internalised' something or other.
It wasn't a good look to have elevated 'lived experience' as the ultimate benchmark of what constitutes truth to then be seen dismissing the 'lived experiences' of many Jews.