The 'per capita income' goal in @AamAadmiParty Delhi budget is a good public target. The simple promise is - the people of Delhi will become much richer, measurably, each year that AAP is in power. Each year, the annual outcomes budget can report on progress to this goal.
AAP has created a positive feedback logic for Delhi Budgets. Public goods and services are provided properly, which means the people don't have to spend their own money for these. They use it instead to spend on other things, which drives local economy and tax revenues.
The 30,000 crores Budget when AAP took over is now at nearly 70,000 crores. And even in a pandemic, the revenue estimates are comfortable enough to allow continuing high investment in health, education, and other public goods.
The 'Singapore level of per-capita income', however, cannot be achieved in Delhi alone. To get there, we'll need to see the states around Delhi also at high levels of income. And that will be possible only when the productivity of public funds is high in those places too.
In various states, examples of good governance can arise. The key for the country will be to turn these into widely implemented choices in other states too, and not have each success remain trapped in the governance of one or two places alone.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Volunteers and civic authorities clearing black spots of garbage often brings a lot of cheer to local residents, and in the media too. A lot of people in civil society groups have participated in such efforts at least once. But the spots recur - as we've always known they would.
The real challenge is to prevent such spots from forming in the first place. And this is a considerably harder task than clearing it for a few days after enough people have complained and endured its stench and sight. Endless beautification hasn't nudged the ball towards that.
The reason is simple. There is a political economy around garbage, and it can only be defeated by perpetual engagement from citizens. Anything that is temporary on the part of citizens is known to be temporary in the political economy too, and it's simple to wait that out.
The pandemic has hurt a lot of children's education, but it's also done one other thing that was long overdue - it has left govt education departments with a much smaller role to play than previously, as more parents begin to look for and accept alternate paths to learning.
Most parents still look forward to the reopening of schools, I'm sure, but their expectations from the schools are bound to have shifted during the pandemic. The most important of these is the sense that physical infrastructure is only a small part of how children learn.
A second shift is the recognition that schools are not the only place to learn. They've always seemed like the natural place to learn, to a lot of people, but if that natural order is disturbed as violently as it is now, there's no choice but to start looking for alternatives.
Across the world, politicians who built rickety public health systems that allowed a full-blown pandemic are offering voters free and locally-made vaccines. It would have been infinitely better to have leaders who wouldn't have landed the world in this soup in the first place.
It should be an easy choice. What would you rather have - a made-in-your-country vaccine for covid, or no virus to worry about in the first place? But the day-to-day machinations of politics converts even a pandemic into a silly soundbite contests.
In a few weeks, we'll probably become the country with the most Covid cases in the world. We'll tell ourselves that's because we have a lot of people, so we should expect higher numbers on everything. But that will just be the excuse of the moment. The truth is a lot worse.
Political promises of a 'free vaccine' are no big deal. There is simply no way to roll it out effectively if it is not free. No matter who makes the decision, it will have to be free to have any chance of being useful. Promises of more jobs, OTOH, are worth examining closely.
This is now a common promise in elections. "We'll CREATE more jobs." Mostly, the promise is not linked to any policy for job creation. It's simply stated as a promise, and repeated. That's unfortunate, because there is a lot that can actually be done to enable more employment.
Or more correctly, there is a lot that can be done to improve livelihoods. This distinction is important, because the the number of educational and training institutions that provide paths to 'employment' in the conventional sense is too small to serve even 10% of the population.
Whether a winning party gets more MLAs from one part of the state or another shouldn't matter once they step into the Assembly. At that point, they all need to act in the interests of the whole state. There should be no room for territorial thinking in such responsible roles
But that's not the end of it. In a large state, if there are regions that have been 'neglected' in the past, or even if such a thing is only the local sentiment of the people, then it is definitely something to be proactively addressed, and in a very visible way.
A few years ago, I proposed that we should set up a Karnataka Regional Economic Development focus within the State Planning Board, and make budgetary provisions for specific regional plans, based on locally competitive industries and historic strengths.
WHO SHOULD TEACH? (From my column in Deccan Herald).
----
For decades, we've known that the education system in the country is badly broken. Fewer than half the children complete school, and many in college are merely going through the motions. None of this is new.
What is new is an Education Policy. The NEP, some educationists say, accepts there are many things that need to be changed. They point out that for the next twenty years we can expect this new vision to dominate the landscape of education policy and implementation.
News articles have picked up the key phrases - pre-primary learning, inclusion, vocations, emphasis on foundational literacy and numeracy, etc. And another set for higher ed - multidisciplinary education, balance between research & teaching, credit banks for courses, and so on.