The government has just announced new legislation restricting #FreedomToProtest. The Police, Crime and Sentencing bill introduces a raft of repressive changes + buried in it are new powers for policing protests
This vindictive piece of legislation comes from Priti Patel's fury over the Black Lives Matter uprisings, +the struggle to police XR protests. These new police powers will affect all of our movements.
Protests are disruptive. That's the POINT of them. But proposed changes to the law make it an offence to cause "annoyance" or "inconvenience". That's most forms of public protest actions.....
The Government are so angry about the toppling of the #Colston Statue by #BLM protesters that they've upped the penalty for damaging statues to a maximum ten year sentence.
In a throwback to the Blair years, the area around Parliament will be a "controlled zone" with extra powers for the police to shut down protests if they're impeding traffic.
This new bill is a threat to all UK social movements that take to the streets. That's why we've developed an alternative vision in our Charter for Freedom of Assembly rights to protect the #FreedomToProtest
Today we are helping students from @OfficialUoM publicise their "Report on Police Harassment on Manchester University Campus 2020-2021" and their call for #copsoffcampus. Read their guest post and download the report netpol.org/2021/03/12/cop…
This report is written by a group of students in #CopsOffCampus, all of whom have witnessed first-hand the treatment of students by the authorities on campus.
Today @HMICFRS launched its report on policing protests, which provides a green light to more surveillance on campaigners and confirms the new name for "domestic extremist" is "aggravated activist".
HMICFRS reports that a new policing unit has “provided good-quality and useful intelligence in relation to protest activity, including from Black Lives Matter and Extinction Rebellion” #GettingTheBalanceWrong
The new definition says aggravated activism is "activity that seeks to bring about political or social change but does so in a way that involves unlawful behaviour or criminality, has a negative impact upon community tensions, or causes an adverse economic impact to businesses"
Today the government announced plans for a new crackdown on the freedom to protest. Home Secretary Priti Patel’s anger is aimed in particular at @XRebellionUK and the rejuvenated Black Lives Matter movement. We are opposing planned changes to the law netpol.org/2021/03/09/pro…
The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill announced today includes plans to “strengthen police powers to tackle non-violent protests that have a significant disruptive effect on the public or on access to Parliament” gov.uk/government/new…
Back in November 2020, we set out what the anticipated new legislation was likely to include: significant changes to the Public Order Act netpol.org/2020/11/26/gov…
Two asylum seekers holding up a bedsheet banner in protest against worsening conditions at Napier Barracks in Folkestone are threatened with fines. Kent Police appear to believe the Human Rights Act is suspended and covid exemptions are fixed for any circumstances
It is worth remembering asylum seekers at Napier Barracks have been forced to become one big "support bubble" by the Home Office. This is only the latest protest against conditions there morningstaronline.co.uk/article/b/asyl…
A charity worker whose job is to support asylum seekers and who is monitoring the police's actions is herself threatened with a fine for "loitering". Current exemptions allow people to "work or provide voluntary or charitable services"
Britain's Conservative government is planning to introduce major changes to public order legislation to crack down on protests, under a new “Protection of the Police and Public Bill” planned for 2021 netpol.org/2020/11/26/gov…
Firstly, the government wants to amend Section 14 of the Public Order Act that gives police the power to impose conditions of a static assembly - so it is more like powers aimed at processions, which can also prohibit a demonstration from entering a specified public place.
Secondly, the government plans to change the wording of powers to impose conditions on protests so that they are no longer for “serious disruption to the life of the community” but for “SIGNIFICANT disruption”, allowing greater flexibility to use these powers
The Metropolitan Police has decided not to routinely release bodycam video footage after internal reviews showed officers displaying "poor communication, a lack of patience, a lack of de-escalation before use of force is introduced" theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/o…
On one level this is almost funny, where it not for the real-world outcomes in so many instances: racial profiling, unjustifiable or simply unlawful arrests, violent restraint, the misuse of Taser and CS, all with little chance that complaints are taken seriously
The police say the "release of BWV is highly likely to exacerbate not prevent ‘trial by social media’ and increase media interest in an incident." What they call "trial by social media" is also called accountability. It led to this officer facing trial bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan…