As my business partner @shiyankoh likes to say, "Startups die from indigestion not starvation".
Meaning - founders often take on too much at the same time and are not focused on enough.
>>
1) As a startup, it's tempting to want to take on EVERYTHING. New features. New markets. New products. New types of customer personas.
People often think they need to raise a lot of money to tackle all these things.
2) The truth is it's much better to limit the scope of what you're doing.
One customer persona (to start). One simple product that does one thing.
And not much else.
3) Even if you have all the ppl and $$ in the world, you as the CEO still only have limited time in the day. And you have to work with all those ppl and all their projects if you take on a lot.
4) This is why the best founders say "no" to just about everything. No to pointless coffee mtgs. No to calls where ppl want to "pick their brains". No to extra commitments.
5) The best founders also often find they have to punt that feature or that new product for many yrs, because they are still so heads down on expanding as much as they can on their current one.
6) Everything I've said is obvious. We all know it. But the tricky thing is being able to assess what is a priority and what isn't.
For example, many of the best founders will also say no to investor cold emails wanting to talk. Or no to press. Or no to speaking at conferences.
7) Should you take those calls? Sometimes you should -- you never know who could further your goal.
But take press -- often press doesn't help you get more customers in a sustainable way. So you should probably turn these calls down more often than not. It's hard to prioritize
8) And so building a startup is largely like playing one of those resource allocation games -- you have to prioritize around 1 strategy -- only 1. At the expense of other ways to potentially win the game.
Sometimes you don't know what fits into your strategy & what doesn't.
9) In addition, how you win at a startup is often completely different from how you win in school, which is what ppl are brought up in.
In school, you try to be good at EVERYTHING. Get good grades in all subj. Be good at a sport. An instrument. Class president.
10) But in startups, you really just want to be great at 1 thing and standout for that one thing. And often it's ok to be bad / mediocre at everything else. This goes against everything we are taught.
11) So how do you do this? and how to do you relentlessly check yourself?
KPIs. (or OKRs -- another topic). Do you have a KPI you are working towards?
12) One metric you're measuring and one number you're trying to hit. That's it.
You either hit that # or you don't.
Using the "One metric that matters" framework you can assess whether the activities you're evaluating doing will help you hit that #.
13) Will that coffee mtg help you hit $10k in sales this month? (if that's your goal)
Will that talk help you hit that goal?
You won't know for sure but it's a good framework to determine what you say yes to and what you don't.
14) Now sometimes ppl don't want to say no to a mtg, because they want to maintain a good relationship with someone. What can you do?
15) These are a few things that I often do:
-This is my go-to: ask if there's something that would be helpful over email instead of mtg (send video or voice recordings)
-shorten the mtg dramatically -- instead of 30 min, make it 20. Or 10.
-Take a raincheck & punt.
16) If you take mtgs or calls all day and/or do talks all day, you won't have enough time to hit your KPIs.
And that's what it takes to build a startup - relentless focus. It's just hard to do.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Friday thread on email and how I get to Inbox Zero almost everyday.
On ave, I receive 200-300 emails per day. Here's how I process mine.
>>
1) At a strategic level, I use the Yesterbox email system.
tl;dr - I look at emails that came in yesterday today. So you only have a finite # of emails to process. (but sometimes I "rescue" impt emails that have come in today and answer them today :D)
2) To implement Yesterbox, I use @boomerang to pause my inbox. It holds all emails that I'm not looking at today in a different folder. When I unpause, it brings all those emails into my inbox.
As we come out of the pandemic, I don't even know what "geography" means anymore.
What does it mean to be focused on investing in US companies? What does it mean to be a US company?
Some thoughts >>
1) Even before the pandemic, we did all of our interviews over video conf and most of our companies are located all over the US, Canada, and Southeast Asia.
There are so many founders we've backed whom I've never met in person even to this day!
2) That being said, we've always had a specific mandate to invest in startups in the US, CAN, and SEA.
These days, though, I have no idea where our founders are. During the pandemic, so many ppl have moved and everyone went remote.
A lot of people are always so floored when they hear about a bootstrapped / near bootstrapped company achieving high levels of revenue. How is that possible?
A (very) quick Monday thread >>
1) It's actually WAY MORE COMMON than you think. This shocks other investors when I tell them about these types of companies.
You just don't know / hear about most of these high flying capital efficient businesses. And they're not usually household names.
2) Here's a co I met in Sweden yrs ago and we invested back then w/ my old firm.
The startup is called @Mentimeter - they make interactive software for events and presentations.
They just published their most recent updates today.
2) There are two ways that it could not be the right path.
1) Entrepreneurship in general is not the right path for you. 2) This particular idea / business / team etc -- the details of your current journey -- is not the right path for you.
1) Yesterday I had a call w/ a portfolio founder - he was going through really tough times. He was running out of cash & had to let go of a lot of his employees. The pandemic has not been easy for him. His mental health is in a rough spot
2) Today I saw the latest markup on a company I backed in 2015. 76x net paper markup! I could not be happier for that founder & company & was thinking about the two situations.
They're actually more alike than you might think.
3) My past portfolio co, like so many, couldn't raise any money. Didn't have fast growth for 4+ yrs. Had a couple of restarts. Insane scrappiness. Tearful conversations even.
In fact, they retain a lot of equity, BECAUSE no one would back them for so long.