A lot of people are always so floored when they hear about a bootstrapped / near bootstrapped company achieving high levels of revenue. How is that possible?
A (very) quick Monday thread >>
1) It's actually WAY MORE COMMON than you think. This shocks other investors when I tell them about these types of companies.
You just don't know / hear about most of these high flying capital efficient businesses. And they're not usually household names.
2) Here's a co I met in Sweden yrs ago and we invested back then w/ my old firm.
The startup is called @Mentimeter - they make interactive software for events and presentations.
They just published their most recent updates today.
I'm so impressed and they are just getting started...
5) In conclusion - I'm so glad (and thank you!) Johnny decided to post their results, because I think the world needs to see that it's definitely possible (and actually not that unusual) to get to high levels w/ out much VC $$.
Most ppl just don't know.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2) There are two ways that it could not be the right path.
1) Entrepreneurship in general is not the right path for you. 2) This particular idea / business / team etc -- the details of your current journey -- is not the right path for you.
1) Yesterday I had a call w/ a portfolio founder - he was going through really tough times. He was running out of cash & had to let go of a lot of his employees. The pandemic has not been easy for him. His mental health is in a rough spot
2) Today I saw the latest markup on a company I backed in 2015. 76x net paper markup! I could not be happier for that founder & company & was thinking about the two situations.
They're actually more alike than you might think.
3) My past portfolio co, like so many, couldn't raise any money. Didn't have fast growth for 4+ yrs. Had a couple of restarts. Insane scrappiness. Tearful conversations even.
In fact, they retain a lot of equity, BECAUSE no one would back them for so long.
What the *(&%#*(@&%(* is going on in the market???
This is my take, but I'm often wrong, but you get what you pay for. :)
Read on >>
1) First some context - last March, public stock prices plunged as we braced for the pandemic in the US.
Personally, I thought it was going to continue plunging, but it stopped & ended up rising to almost pre-COVID levels for sectors that had been HIT HARD (travel etc)
2) And for companies that THRIVED in the pandemic (Zoom, Shopify, et al), they had an enormous run in 2020!
Meanwhile, the private markets had a slightly different trajectory. In the spring & early summer of 2020, VCs basically halted investing.
Today's thread builds off a question I've been hearing a lot about in the last 24 hours.
As a founder, what do you do if investors tell you they're committed to investing if there is a lead?
1) First off, let me tell you how EXCITED I was when I was told this when I was raising for my past startup. I thought that it was so great that I was getting commits.
And I would often respond, "Ok! I'll come back when I have a lead!" This was a big mistake.
2) It turns out most of the time when investors tell you they are committed to investing if there's a lead, it's not a lie, but it's also not a real commitment.
It's the easiest way to tell a founder no without actually doing so.
In today's tweet thread, I want to tell you a bit about my journey and why I'm such a stickler for customer acquisition. That seems to be the only drum that I'm beating, but it is SO SO SO important.
Read on >>
1) In late 2008, I quit my cushy job at Google to start a company. At the time, I think I was more enamored w/ the idea of starting a business rather than having a specific problem to solve.
But we all remember that time - it was a TOUGH time. No one would fund me.
2) And for those who did get funding, I remember valuations in kickass businesses in Silicon Valley being around $2m post-money. Seems laughable now. But ppl felt so grateful to get those offers.