Thread by @AlexEpstein

The House Democrats' "CLEAN Future" Act, by forcing us to depend mostly on unreliable wind and solar, would destroy our standard of living--and global emissions would still rise.

It should be rejected in favor of an *aggressive nuclear decriminalization policy*.

THREAD

The only practical way to lower global CO2 emissions is to develop low-carbon sources that are cheaper than fossil fuels. If the US, which causes <1/6 of global emissions, mandates unaffordable low-carbon sources, we'll hurt ourselves--while global CO2 emissions continue rising.

The world, especially the developing world, overwhelmingly uses fossil fuels because that is by far the lowest-cost way for them to get reliable energy. Unreliable solar and wind can’t come close. That’s why China and India have committed to building hundreds of new coal plants.

Unreliable wind and solar cannot compete with fossil fuels. Because they can always go near zero--as we saw recently in Texas--they don't replace the cost of reliable power plants, they add to the cost of reliable power plants. That's why more wind and solar = higher prices.

The only non-carbon energy source that has a chance of outcompeting fossil fuels and lowering global emissions is nuclear energy. Nuclear is incredibly safe, incredibly reliable, and can be generated anywhere in the world. And it can be produced at low cost.

Unfortunately, nuclear has become ultra-expensive in the US because politicians (mostly Dems) have demonized it and virtually criminalized it through endless unscientific regulations--along with wind/solar favors+subsidies, like the "PTC," that defund reliable nuclear plants.

US policy is so anti-nuclear that virtually no one will attempt to build a nuclear plant in this country--and this year utilities are planning to shut down a record amount of our existing low-carbon, low-cost, reliable nuclear power plants!

eia.gov/todayinenergy/…

Any policy serious about CO2 emissions needs to recognize the severe deficiencies of wind/solar and *make nuclear decriminalization priorities number 1, 2, and 3*. Instead, the Democrat-led Energy & Commerce Committee has proposed mandating catastrophic amounts of wind and solar.

The "CLEAN Future" Act mandates 80% "clean electricity” by 2030--but does nothing substantial to reverse the criminalization and defunding of nuclear. So nuclear will decrease from its 20% share today. Hydro, at <7% today, has little room for growth. That means >50% wind/solar!

Consider: Germans, to get 37% of their electricity from wind/solar, have doubled their prices--now 3X US prices. And US prices are already inflated, along with big reliability problems, at 10% wind/solar. This is what we're supposed to quintuple down on in 9 years??

During TX's recent cold spell, wind and solar disappeared when they were needed the most. Its expensive batteries, which can store a mere 40 seconds, didn’t help, either. What the hell would they have done under the CLEAN Future Act?

The US adopting anything like the CLEAN Future Act would lead to a far more extreme version of the outcomes we are seeing globally with wind/solar schemes: driving up electricity costs, harming economies, destroying domestic industries, and harming consumers. And for what?

The only benefit from the suicidal CLEAN Future Act would be to China, which thanks in large part to its 86% fossil fuel energy system dominates the mining, processing, and manufacturing of wind/solar components. China will be happy to sell us even more inferior energy.

By forcing Americans to use unreliable solar and wind, the CLEAN Future Act won’t stop global CO2 levels from rising, because China and others won’t be stupid enough to follow suit. The only thing it will bring about is an economic and security crisis in America.

Anyone who cares about human life, America, and rising CO2 levels has a clear path forward: support the decriminalization of nuclear, the only hope for globally competitive low-carbon energy. And reject suicidal policies like the CLEAN Future Act.

For more information on pro-nuclear, pro-freedom, pro-America, pro-human energy policies go to EnergyTalkingPoints.com.