Nearly a million Twitter followers - yet only 2K YT subs, and $60,000 from Democratic political action committees to say what he says.
No disclosures anywhere - you're supposed to think this is organic reach from guy nextdoor.
This is what being "defiant" and "resisting" looks like. Donors in pic 1 sent to RA, and RA paid Padellan.
Also, two OpenSecrets pages, but one shows no data for Majid. But they re-confirm the info on another page, calling Majid one of ReallyAmerican's "top vendors/recipients.
Spread the link around if ya want - and BTW... for all the people who called me a "grifter" last year? I didn't even make 10K. This guy is what grifting really looks like.
I'll try to earn your support this year - thanks y'all who care.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Mandating masks is not a "property rights" issue, a thread:
How many businesses are "privately owned" anymore? Esp with the lockdowns transferring power to megacorporations (imitations of the state, not the market - SEKIII), the existence of truly "private business" has downgraded to near zero.
Most of what are here are statist lapdogs on their dole and at their behest, spiraling toward a panopticon of fascism. Masks are a step in that direction.
For those curious about why I'm laughing about this situation, watch this video:
She has literally tried to cancel, censor, and otherwise destroy me, because I spread accurate information about the outlet she publicly says she wrote for.
More? She repeatedly tried to get that video taken down, citing "privacy violations", while claiming publicly that I was negatively affecting her professional life by the video showing up prominently in search results. That Streisand effect made it the most popular vid on my YT.
She also repeatedly accused me of "doxxing" - a thing I didn't do - and tried to get people censored for being on my side (@KilldozerSZN, @VoluntaryDom, and @AnarchoLibooty, for instance).
I made a vid about what doxxing actually is, and that died down.
The idea this is laughable to you is an amusing glimpse into your arrogance. He has his following for a reason, and is censored for a reason. He questions the status quo, and models that which make sense of it.
Your arrogance (including calling be a "baby", and essentializing conspiracy theorists as "wackjobs") is further typified by assuming you know everything I've read and been through, all while claiming I "don't know half" of the other way around.
No amount of "reading about relationship anarchy" will make me wrong about 1, 2, and 3, and you proved nothing in either your original tweet or this one.
You weren't censored, and blocking someone on Twitter is not censoring them. Stop promoting CSAM legalization, you cretin.
You adopt anarchist aesthetic, to paper over your desire to get away with unethical acts, while not seeing consequences for them. It's why you promoted Russia as an example of a sex-positive society; you don't actually have any interest in statelessness.
Nope. There's no "religious fundamentalism" in abstinence - the fact that people can do it for religious reasons is not evidence that all reasons are religious. Patriarchy doesn't exist, but calling me a conspiracy theorist while pushing that CT? Amusing.
1) No, yes, yes. *built 2) No they aren't, and only if you want to. 3) Completely untrue, and a direct result of the media lying to you about it - as evidenced by "muh Twitter" when it's on all platforms. 4) And? What do you suggest replacing it with?
5) He was way better than you, and you have very limited "interesting bits", if any. 6) No. 7) The state agrees with and loves this take. Anarchists shouldn't. 8) Yes. 9) No. We should all get fit enough to destroy what destroys us, and not be unhealthy.
10) No it isn't, and fortunately, few people care what you think. 11) Vague statements like this are worthless and require no thought or knowledge. 12) Ancoms are libertarians, and political libertarianism started w/ ancoms. You diss libertarian org tho.