10am! House Judiciary, antitrust hearing. I'm most interested in upcoming testimony from Microsoft Prez Brad Smith. In past months, they've come out as a brilliant advocate for the needs of a free and plural press in Australia, EU. Loved + appreciated. /1 judiciary.house.gov/calendar/event…
This dimension today is important - the downstream impact to journalism from lack of antitrust enforcement, particularly Google and Facebook. Investigations globally have connected the duopoly's stranglehold upstream to its unique access to data, particularly tracking users. /2
Microsoft, like with Apple, is a critically important voice and yes showing strong leadership by supporting press, consumer privacy and calling out uneven bargaining power considering size of their own companies. I respect this and yes it's easier due to their own biz models. /3
There is a common thread. If you're a trusted brand, particularly one in which consumers directly pay for your product, then you have a heightened level of attention to one customer (users) and avoid the "healthy tension" of balancing advertisers' interests and consumer trust. /4
"the market power of Google and Facebook due to the unprecedented amount of data collected by these companies" - @davidcicilline has quickly become an expert on the often hidden dynamics of their market power. References @DCNorg statement in opening (digitalcontentnext.org/wp-content/upl…).
Also references landmark investigations overseas. most uncovered story is how much more digital savvy the press, lawmakers, staffers, think tanks, state and federal regulators across all political parties here, UK, EU, Australia, Canada have gotten... many have played a role. /6
Opening statement by @RepKenBuck also hits home Google and Facebook dominance. Buck also clearly understands the data issue and ties to downstream symptoms from market power including, yes, censorship decisions he doesn’t trust. These are all downstream issues from antitrust. /7
A good question for a witness (yes, looking at Glenn Greenwald) is whether they've actually run a self-funding publishing biz. interesting side note, Clay Travis worked under me at one point 13yrs ago. These are complex issues, all seem to be taking issue with market power. /8
bizarro world. Lawmaker associating the President of the second largest company on the planet with Ayn Rand in an apparent attempt to discredit an argument of a need for antitrust enforcement of Google and Facebook? /9
Side note, can someone educate Clay Travis on the history of the internet if he’s going to attempt to play more than entertainer? I don’t have the patience. Thx. /10
Jordan's argument about more speech requires nuance as it ties back to dominance of Facebook and Google and their algorithmic amplification decisions. That's a real issue allowing them to maximize profits and suppress counter speech in the process. See @techreview yesterday. /11
“When companies start threatening countries...” President of second largest company on planet speaking truth to the power of Facebook and Google.” Extraordinary. /12
Here is Smith’s full answer directly pointing at Google and Facebook’s threats. Facebook went further than Google before caving. But both demonstrated they are willing to put profits ahead of democracy. /13
watch work of journalism prof. His statement (in blue) takes sentence fragment from letter (in yellow), changes "could" into a "would" and applies a pov outside of reality to make his point in order to protect Google+Facebook harming news. Sorta wild. /14
Campbell Brown's outrageous threatening statement reported a few years ago was just entered into the record by @davidcicilline. It created important context when Facebook and its leadership decided to go to war with democracy for profits in Australia. /15
Bipartisanship. 👏🏽 Watch this. Republican Ranking Member showing leadership with Democratic Chair asking whether their joint bill would cover @DailyCaller, @BreitbartNews, @theintercept, etc. super helpful to move this above politics to democracy, antitrust amd competition. /16
that's a wrap. good hearing. helpful to keep the impact on journalism, news publishers and free press top of mind as lawmakers and regulators work through the imbalance in bargaining power demonstrated by Google and Facebook. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Amazing. What are the odds??? I spy Joel Kaplan’s comms operative immediately next to Twitter’s Comms chief as @CaseyNewton leads a live convo with @_KarenHao about her massive report today on the toxic biz model of Facebook. technologyreview.com/2021/03/11/102…
I love it when @_KarenHao begins an answer with “When Facebook still thought I was going to write a puff piece...”
And Casey doing an outro for Twitter Spaces after ninety minutes of dissecting Facebook between press, ex-employees, academics and competitors also pretty enjoyable.
Watching Facebook's Sheryl Sandberg repeatedly gaslight at her trade body's meeting as @r2rothenberg labels Facebook's issues as "memes." First, she dismisses the toxicity of their profit maximization to democracy. Read this please. /1 technologyreview.com/2021/03/11/102…
Then she goes off on how diligent Facebook is in taking down fake accounts which semantically is at odds with unsealed evidence from just weeks ago and we await the unsealed fraud complaint. /2
Then she moves into full-throated defense of "personalized advertising" with Rothenberg again gaslighting on what is required to personalize advertising and avoiding the topic of how most of Facebook's data collection and tracking happens we use services not owned by Facebook. /3
This is the chief lobbyist, who as much as anyone fixes the privacy rules low to protect the surveillance ads industry for Adtech, Google and Facebook. He apparently believes broadcasting his physical attributes to the internet isn’t creepy. No idea why video goes dark. 1/5
This is false. IAB lobbyist presenting California privacy law as unbaked and stating CPRA goes into enforcement 2yrs from now when it has 1yr lookback meaning it’s 9 months away. Strategy here to undermine Californian’s privacy rights while jamming through weaker state laws. 2/5
Those little icons all over the web signaling you’re being tracked and targeted with ads? and require you to individually optout of hundreds of companies you don’t know exist? They’re a success and compared to McDonald’s cheeseburgers. 3/5
Award winning Filipino-American journalist @mariaressa could face more than 100 years in prison on criminal charges including cyber libel.
It’s time for the Philippine government to drop all charges against #MariaRessa. #CourageOn#HoldTheLine
Please watch and share. It's important and appreciated.
Finally, take a quick moment to sign and share this petition joining CPJ and 80+ #pressfreedom organizations in our call to #HoldTheLine in support of journalists Maria Ressa and Reynaldo Santos and independent media in the #Philippines. rsf.org/en/free-mariar…
Ha ha 😂😹 Ha ha 😂😹 Ha ha 😂😹 Ha ha 😂😹 Ha ha 😂😹 Ha ha 😂😹 Ha ha 😂😹 Ha ha 😂😹 Ha ha 😂😹 Ha ha 😂😹 Ha ha 😂😹 Ha ha 😂😹 Ha ha 😂😹 Ha ha
There are literally emails where Facebook communicates a strategy to restrict its developer platform and access to its personal data based on competitive threats. Including one where CEO explicitly calls for removing a competitor, “go for it.”
Please just read this sentence. Facebook, Facebook, Facebook. They’ve also claimed unsuccessfully DC AG doesn’t have standing over its citizens and are currently arguing the entire nation of Canada doesn’t over its citizens either!
Important context. Yesterday, CEO of Google and Facebook's key trade group (IAB) framed antitrust scrutiny as "short-sighted" attempting to redirect #1 priority towards federal privacy law (pro tip: to undermine CA law which threatens adtech and tracking). bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
The reality is the battle for the future sits at the intersection of data policy and competition policy. Multiyear investigations in Australia, Europe, UK and US have established this. In the US, it's led to lawsuits to break up Google and Facebook. What is not true, though, is..
the scrutiny out of DC and abroad is not confusion over "privacy, fake news, censorship and competition"...these are all downstream symptoms from a lack of enforcement on data and competition...and lack of self-regulation by industry led by Google and Facebook's trade groups.