From purely commonsensical standpoint the Senate rejection of votes ruling nonsensical (1) no separate box as such. It’s all one rectangle with name & some white space (2) Instructions don’t specify where in box to stamp - so can be anywhere (3) Footage that oral instructions 1/4
being given also vague & appear to allow stamping anywhere in the box (4) Even if stamp is on candidate name, intent of voter abundantly clear. No ambiguity who vote is for. Rejection of votes over technical & w/out basis. Could’ve designed better forms & been clearer that 2/4
except the white patch stamping anywhere in candidate rectangle not acceptable. This should be overturned & quickly. Of course if this is deliberate - though if I wanted to waste the vote I would do something much more problematic than stamping the candidate name - & under 3/4
duress from those who should not be dragged, then it doesn’t really matter because one way or the other they shall prevail. But what a pathetic show. First, more cameras in polling area than in a Nikon factory & then this ridiculous & farcical ruling to manufacture results
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
