The authors used an eye-tracking headset with 19 participants who drove a set route in a retail/residential area of Toronto. The route included two turns off a major road with a bike lane (Bloor St.) onto other roads.
Turn 1 had a painted bike lane, while Turn 2 had a lane separated by parked cars that had a median with a bollard at the intersection. The parking ended 10m before the intersection.
The data from the headset was paired with video of the road to determine whether drivers looked at areas of importance (e.g., the bike lanes, sidewalks and crosswalks). Drivers were also asked how often the failed to notice pedestrians or almost hit cyclists.
11 of the 19 participants failed to check for cyclists in at least one of the turns. Some drivers (4 drivers for Turn 1, and 2 drivers for Turn 2) failed to look at the bike lane at all. Turn 2 required an over the shoulder check, but 7 drivers failed to do so.
In my opinion, this research shows that campaigns telling cyclists to make eye contact with drivers are inherently flawed. It's impossible to make eye contact with someone who isn't looking for you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This study comes from Grenoble, France, which is a cycling-friendly city. The authors did 19 interviews with policymakers, residents with different identities, and bike service providers to identify barriers to cycling for people from marginalized communities.
From these interviews, the authors identified four main barriers to cycling: racism, financial barriers, information or knowledge barriers, and spatial inequalities.
The authors (@RachelAldred, @Urban_Turbo and Anna Goodman who I can't find on twitter), looked at car registration data from 2015-2019 to determine whether LTNs and other cycling infrastructure built in London, England impacted car ownership compared to other areas in the city.
Two years after a low-traffic neighbourhood was built, car ownership in that area had decreased by 6% (23 cars/vans per 1000) relative to other areas of the city. Likewise, where cycle tracks were built, car ownership decreased by 2% (7 cars/vans per 1000).
In light of all the bad news for pedestrians and cyclists this week, this #CyclingScienceSunday let's look at how news coverage of crashes affects perceptions of pedestrians.
TL;DR: people are hit by drivers, not cars. @ your favourite journalist.
The authors wrote three versions of a news article about a collision: a pedestrian-focused, a driver-focused and a thematically-framed (i.e., putting the crash in the context of other similar crashes) version.
Around 1000 people were given one of these versions to read, and then were asked a series of questions about who was to blame, what the punishment should be, and how to improve safety.
This study is from Sweden, which has a pretty robust cycling culture (although the study is 20 years old and it was a bit different then). The authors differentiated between people who frequently bike in the winter, don't bike in the winter, infrequently bike or never bike.
Study participants were asked to rank the importance of factors influencing what mode of transport they took.
Those who biked in summer but not in winter rated precipitation, road condition and temperature as the most significant reasons for not choosing bikes in the winter.
Got bored and re-wrote The Charge of the Light Brigade to be about a group of unlucky commuter cyclists. Sincere apologies to Tennyson and my various English professors for the ungodly things I did to the metre to get it to fit into 280 characters...
I
Half a league, half a league,
Half a league onward,
All in the bike lane of Death
Rode the six cyclists.
“Forward, the commuters!
Ride in the lane!” he said.
Into the bike lane of Death
Rode the six cyclists.
II
“Forward, the commuters!”
Was there a one dismayed?
Not though the cyclists knew
The City had blundered.
Theirs not to make reply,
Theirs not to reason why,
Theirs but to do and die.
Into the bike lane of Death
Rode the six cyclists.
Fact 1: Calgary's Supervised Consumption Site ("SCS") led to an increase in crime.
The source for this is, oddly, a letter to the editor to a Barrie newspaper, although there were reports of increased crime near the cite (but see facts 3 and 4 below).
What the Association doesn't note with this fact is that the Calgary SCS prevented 1,055 overdoses, overdose events decreased by 336% due to the SCS's drug safety education, and each $1 spent on an SCS saves the province $5 in other costs.