The U.S. National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence submitted its final report to the president and Congress last week. It's pretty all-encompassing: reports.nscai.gov/final-report/t…
Among other things, it advocates for "targeted disentanglement" with China: maintaining collaborative AI research and technology commerce, while building resilience, reducing illicit technology transfer, and protecting critical sectors.
Also, the report specifically highlights the backlog on Indian immigration to the United States as a problem.
It also advocates for a number of other sweeping immigration reforms (all will be politically tricky):
- Broaden scope of O-1 visa
- Increase job flexibility for H-1B
- Give green cards to STEM PhDs
- Double employment-based green cards
- Create new entrepreneur visa category
A chapter on hardware: "The dependency of the United States on semiconductor imports, particularly from Taiwan, creates a strategic vulnerability...to adverse foreign government action, natural disaster, and other events that can disrupt the supply chains for electronics.”
This is a fantastic chart on the state of one of the most important arms races today:
These graphics on the future of AI and warfighting...
By the way, in October, @ORFAmerica partnered with @CEIPTechProgram for a discussion with the co-chairs of the commission (Eric Schmidt and Bob Work), as well as K. VijayRaghavan, Principal Scientific Advisor to GOI, and others.
Today is 10 years since my grandfather, K. Subrahmanyam, passed away. Last year, at the National Defence College, I discussed 7 ways in which he contributed to India's strategic thought and practice: dhruvajaishankar.blogspot.com/2020/09/k-subr…
It was both a benefit and a liability for him that he never had formal training, nor did he fit into a single professional category:
1. The first area of contribution was in helping to establish and later develop @IDSAIndia. A desire for institution building that extended to his advocacy for an Indian National Defence University.
THREAD: Now that U.S. President-elect Joe Biden has named or nominated senior members of his foreign policy and national security team, it might be useful to survey what all they have written or said in the recent past:
1. Tony Blinken has been named Secretary of State. Here is a wide-ranging conversation that touches upon a lot of global issues from last July: hudson.org/research/16210…
2. Wendy Sherman is set to be Deputy Secretary of State. Here she is on Trump's foreign policy from July 2020: belfercenter.org/publication/to…
If the reports are correct about the national security and foreign policy principals that Biden will name this week, a few items of potential interest in the following thread. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Transcript of a wide-ranging conversation this summer between Blinken and Walter Russell Mead at the Hudson Institute: hudson.org/research/16210…
There's a lot in the India-U.S. joint statement released today, and it's useful as a stocktaking exercise. But beyond the headlines, a few small but important items that captured developments over the past 12 months:
"The Ministers welcomed the establishment of a permanent presence of the U.S. International Development Finance Cooperation (DFC) in India this year."
"The Ministers welcomed the convening of the Military Cooperation Group (MCG) later this year to review bilateral military-to-military engagement including joint exercises, training and expert exchanges."
Chairman NSCAI and former Google CEO Eric Schmidt: "AI...enables everything else. Progress in science will be fundamentally accelerated...The profound effect on health is yet to be seen...This is the time to get AI right...The China competition becomes very important."
Schmidt: China has a concerted plan to lead in AI. Russia is using AI for military purposes. America alone is not going to make it. The values that Chinese infrastructure are built on are different. The combination of the people and the energy make India the critical partner.
It turns out that a recent popular history of the Ottoman Sultan Selim I, written by no less than the chair of the History Department at Yale University...
...which claims that the Ottomans "made our modern world" and influenced "nearly every major event" of the era "from China to Mexico" (claims reproduced faithfully in outlets such as the Washington Post)...
...but described by professional historians as full of "bizarre ideas," a "tissue of falsehoods, half-truths and absurd speculations," an "example of how global history should not be written"...