dan barker Profile picture
15 Mar, 14 tweets, 6 min read
With Thorntons closing all 61 stores, being able to generate demand online is hugely important.

As you can see from this chart of Google searches for their brand name (text search), basically over the last 18 months Hotel Chocolat have 'eaten them alive' online.
It's peak 'easter egg' season, so not a great time for this news to come out.

Thorntons rank #2 in Google organic search for 'easter eggs' in the UK but they're not particularly visible as competitor ads bump them down a fair way.
Bidding on 'head terms' like 'easter eggs' is not always a wise thing to do, but you'd have thought they'd at least make it into the shopping ads there which (even reloading & going incognito) are almost entirely Hotel Chocolat.
In theory you can see Hotel Chocolat have roughly 3x the traffic of Thorntons.
Comparing the rough channel mix of each, you can see that Thorntons' traffic is swayed much more toward 'free' channels (direct/organic search). Hotel Chocolat pays for a higher proportion of theirs (Paid Search, Display ads).
Aesthetics isn't everything, but here're the two sites' homepages side-by-side.

That's sort of fair enough though, no? Hotel Chocolat are aiming at a more 'premium' market, so the site must feel premium?
Sadly not quite. Here are the prices of the top 4 products sorted by default on each of their 'Easter Eggs' pages (the main link from the homepage main feature).

Hotel Chocolat:
£10
£29
£15
£29

Thorntons:
£70
£20
£30
£25
But saddest of all is perhaps this:

Thorntons are putting all of their eggs in the 'online' basket. Social media is usually a smaller sales channel for online retailers, but is 'free' and useful from a brand/pr perspective.

Here are some quick notes on that.
Thorntons:
Insta - 6,127 followers
Twitter - 26.3k followers

Hotel Chocolat:
Insta - 215k followers
Twitter - 69.9k followers
At least Thorntons are up to date there though - see the insta image above where 'Easter' is their latest post on Insta? Sadly not:

The top post on Thorntons' Insta account is from 2017. (this is a company that have today announced they're going online only)
Twitter and Facebook are not quite as bad date wise, but are way worse message wise.

The latest posts to Twitter & Facebook are from a year ago, explaining they've stopped orders 'until Monday at 9am'. No update since, though they still link to these channels on their website.
Then there's email. Both have a fairly similar frequency of emails.

You can see though that Hotel Chocolat are much more aggressive in terms of offers, while still feeling quite 'premium'.

Thorntons are just sadly repetitive (same primary image/messages repeatedly).
And finally, social ads.

Here are just a few of the ads Hotel Chocolat are currently running (left).

And on the right, you can see the ads Thorntons are running, 2 weeks ahead of Easter. (ie: they haven't even tested them in the last few years).
In summary: The online side of Thorntons has been sadly neglected by their owner Ferrero.

It's been a very tough year for retail, but for gift categories like this, demand has been extremely positive online.

Sad to see, for what was, and could be again, an iconic British brand.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with dan barker

dan barker Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @danbarker

1 Mar
SEMrush, the SEO tool, has filed to go public. Here's the S-1: sec.gov/Archives/edgar…

They spent $54 million on marketing last year, for revenue of $125 million.

(gross profit $95m, net loss $7m)
They state they have 67,000 customers. Divide $125 million profit by 67k and that would mean average $155 per customer per month spend.

(nb this ignores growth over the year, just total revenue divided by current customer numbers)
Their timeline states they passed 50,000 customers in 2019, meaning roughly 10-15k customers added across 2020.
Read 8 tweets
28 Feb
Saturday Night, Leicester Square. Image
Coventry Street. Image
There were a few people about a little earlier. A group of guys, playing football on Piccadilly Circus.

A few weeks ago there were often police vans here, stopping people asking why they were walking there. Feels much more relaxed already. Image
Read 7 tweets
1 Jan
It's been quiet in London again.

I'd been planning to go for a long walk by the coast if restrictions lifted, but they did not.

So we spent a few hours walking round the 14 London Railway Terminus Stations instead

It's a nice walk: a 16 mile loop you could start at any station
We started at Charing Cross.

The 'cross' at the front there is actually a replica. The original stood to the south of Trafalgar Square.

It was one of 12 'Eleanor Crosses', marking the funeral path of Quean Eleanor, on her way to Westminster Abbey, after she unexpectedly died.
From there we walked round via the river, and Parliament, up past Westminster Abbey, to Victoria.
Read 36 tweets
30 Dec 20
Twitter has a fairly decent tool showing you which of your tweets people find most interesting. You can find it at analytics.twitter.com

Here's a thread of tweets over the last year with my monthly stats. Do share yours as a reply/quote retweet if willing. Image
This was most popular in December last year: A tweet about George Michael with 2.91 million impressions.

I guess so popular because lots of people like George Michael, it was the anniversary of his death, & the story of his secret philanthropy is lovely.

Image
This was most popular in January: The true story of Michel Thomas. The tweet had 500k impressions, & the thread many more.

A couple of publishers got in touch asking if I'd write it up, and a conference wanted permission to use it. I just love the story.

Image
Read 16 tweets
11 Aug 20
You've probably seen tweets about a YouGov survey which says 'almost half of Britons have little to no sympathy' for 'the migrants' crossing the channel.

On the left is one of the tweets, and on the right is how YouGov presented it.

It is worth looking a bit deeper...
As background, you will know that many people have trouble feeling empathy for large groups.

This is one of the reasons that charity campaigns use images of individuals rather than groups.

It is why the image on the left feels somehow more harrowing than the image on the right.
You will also know that there is occasionally debate over the words 'migrant', 'refugee', and 'asylum seeker', and that in this case YouGov have chosen to ask about 'the migrants'.

Maybe this wording & the 'group empathy' issue make a difference, maybe they does not.
Read 16 tweets
1 Aug 20
Quite a lot of confusion about this.

Here is a very short thread explaining it a bit.
Historically when you went from Website A to Website B, an http referer header told Website B 'This visitor came from WebsiteA.com, and they were looking at a page at '/category/dresses/?sort=low-to-high' (called the 'path', but most users think of it as the page).
For years that was absolute norm; Google even allowed sites to see which keywords users had searched for before reaching their site. (still do if you pay for ads)

When more sites started moving to https, in most cases, visits between https & http, the 'page' info would be hidden
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!