As more and more people received #COVID19 vaccines in Hong Kong, it will soon be time to think about how immune status could modify our test-and-trace procedures locally (1/17)
tl;dr summary: I think vaccinated persons should still be isolated if testing positive, while quarantine duration could be reduced or even converted to medical surveillance for some fully vaccinated persons (2/17)
If you have respiratory symptoms, you should be tested for COVID, whether or not you have previously been infected, and whether or not you have been vaccinated. Testing is also done on contacts of known cases, as well as people living or working near known cases (3/17)
I think it is appropriate for testing to disregard prior infection or vaccination status because we know people who have been previously infected, or vaccinated, can still be infected again. It’s also possible to detect prolonged shedding in some infected persons (4/17)
If a person tests positive for #COVID19 in Hong Kong, even if they are asymptomatic, they are admitted to an isolation ward in a regular hospital or a field hospital until they are judged to have recovered (5/17)
Recovery could be quicker for vaccinated persons, but I think there is no reason that vaccinated-but-still-infected persons should be exempt from isolation. They may still be infectious, and they are in the best place if medical attention is needed (6/17)
The Department of Health in HK traces the contacts of known cases, as a targeted approach to reduce onwards transmission in the community. Close contacts, with the highest chance of having been infected, are placed in quarantine for 14 days since their most recent exposure (7/17)
If a person tests positive after entering quarantine, the walls of the quarantine facilities will prevent any onwards transmission in the community that would otherwise have occurred. Currently I think around 5% of quarantined contacts ultimately test positive (8/17)
My colleagues and I have estimated that contact tracing and quarantine is reducing transmission in Hong Kong by around 25% - not enough to prevent epidemic waves as we have seen repeatedly over the past year - but an important contribution (9/17)
If we didn’t use this type of targeted approach, we might need more drastic social distancing measures like have been seen elsewhere in the world (10/17)
If a close contact has been fully vaccinated, their risk of infection after exposure drops substantially, and there would not be as much effect on transmission of placing fully-vaccinated-close-contacts in quarantine. Particularly if they received the BioNTech vaccine (11/17)
We know the Sinovac vaccine is very good at reducing the risk of severe illness or death if a breakthrough infection occurs, but it only has a moderate effectiveness of around 50% against mild infection, and mild infections can be contagious (12/17)
It is not too surprising that mainland China has not yet announced a shorter quarantine duration for arriving travelers who have received mainland-produced vaccines like Sinovac, perhaps because it would be too much of a risk? (13/17)
The incentive for receiving a mainland-produced vaccine being presented in this article is only an easier visa application process (14/17)
nytimes.com/2021/03/12/wor…
The BioNTech vaccine is much more effective, likely more than 90% effective against mild infections, meaning a close contact who was fully vaccinated w/ BioNTech might have on average less than a 0.5% chance of being infected rather than a 5% chance (15/17)
Perhaps close contacts who have received BioNTech could be placed under medical surveillance, and required to be tested multiple times during the 14 days since exposure, but could avoid being sent to a quarantine camp. (16/17)
How about quarantine-free arrival for fully-vaccinated travelers coming to Hong Kong? That will be unlikely until we reach a high level of population immunity (see article), and will be the topic of a later thread (17/17)
news.mingpao.com/pns/%E8%A7%80%…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben Cowling

Ben Cowling Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bencowling88

18 Mar
Hong Kong Citizen News have kindly agreed to publish my commentary on herd immunity. It's a long read, available here, grab a coffee: hkcnews.com/article/39405/… I published a similar commentary a few weeks ago in Chinese in Mingpao. I'll give a short summary in a new thread below
Herd immunity describes the situation where a high enough fraction of the population are immune that a large epidemic is no longer possible. Immunity can be acquired through infection or through vaccination (2/10)
In some parts of the world, herd immunity will be reached mainly through large numbers of infections. In other places like Hong Kong where infection rates have been kept low by successful public health measures, herd immunity could be achieved through vaccination (3/10)
Read 11 tweets
17 Sep 20
Our work on superspreading has just been published nature.com/articles/s4159…, the preprint was posted a few months ago.
Key finding - between 23 January and 28 April 2020 in Hong Kong, we analysed contact tracing data and estimated that 19% of cases seeded 80% of all local transmission. For those interested in the dispersion parameter k it was 0.33 (95% CI: 0.14–0.98). nature.com/articles/s4159…
Read 5 tweets
6 Aug 20
Here is an update on the #COVID19 situation in Hong Kong, following from my thread last week covid19.sph.hku.hk (1/18)
(2/18) We have seen daily case numbers decline in the past few days, and hopefully we have now passed the peak in our "third wave" (which is really a second wave here, because what is being referred to as the "first wave" in Hong Kong was not a wave ...). hk.appledaily.com/local/20200730…
(3/18) However, the local reproductive number has not dipped very far below 1. A reproductive number of exactly 1 would mean on average one case is infecting one further person, and daily numbers of cases would stay the same from week to week. The lower R is below 1, the better.
Read 18 tweets
30 Jul 20
(1/9) Good news about COVID-19 suppression in Hong Kong, today we estimate that the daily reproductive number Rt dropped below 1 on 22 July, around a week ago covid19.sph.hku.hk
(2/9) There is a delay in estimates of Rt due to a 10-day lag between infections and laboratory confirmations, including an average of 5 days incubation period (time from infection to illness onset) and another 5 days on average between illness onset and laboratory confirmation.
(3/9) Since Rt fell below 1 on 22 July, we would expect the epidemic curve of cases by illness onset to reach a peak approximately 5 days after that (27 July), and the daily number of laboratory-confirmed cases to reach a peak within 7-14 days after 22 July.
Read 9 tweets
10 Jul 20
(1/7) Worrying indications that the second wave of COVID-19 has now begun in Hong Kong, with more than 50 local infections being identified in the past few days and a large number expected to be reported later today.
(2/7) Our estimate of the effective reproductive number "Rt" for local infections is close to 3, which is concerning covid19.sph.hku.hk It will take a lot of effort to bring down such a high reproductive number.
(3/7) Clusters have been identified in an elderly home, a public housing estate, and linked with some restaurants. Test+trace has not prevented this. Mask-wearing in public is still universal, and has not prevented this. scmp.com/news/hong-kong…
Read 7 tweets
29 Jun 20
Happy to read this op-ed in HKFP. People in Hong Kong have been wearing masks since early February, we always knew they would help even when public health authorities were advising against it hongkongfp.com/2020/06/29/i-w…
However I take exception to one of the assertions in the article
Trump _should_ set a good example by wearing a mask. BUT since he and his team are being tested daily, and anyone who meets him needs to do a COVID-19 test, I doubt that his failure to wear a mask is posing much risk to himself or the people around him? cnbc.com/2020/05/07/cor…
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!