As I have tweeted countless times but the MSM news channels never seem to pick up on.
Shipments from GB to NI are logistically/customs/SPS wise the same as GB to ROI/whole EU.
They are equally moving across the EU customs & regulatory/SPS compliance border.
Yet UK Gov wants people to simultaneously believe it's a huge logistical issue (GB to NI)
and not an issue (GB to EU).
The *exact* same issues are occuring. So instead of Orwellian "Doublespeak" which is it?
A big problem or not a problem?
It is of course fact that *both* are equally decimating or destructive to GB consignor & NI & EU consignee. .

As it would be again for NI to GB and EU to GB shipments but for political priorities (esp NI to GB) and not having the capacity, by a long way, to do so (esp EU to GB)
Instead GB is here painting a world smugglers target on itself..which also means the EU/world's governments will instruct their border forces to customs & regulatory/SPS process UK produce & products (re-emerging from bandit country) accordingly .depressing UK exports yet further
As well as, in addition, the world's governments
(and UK exporters trying to find some scrapings of solace on their home market)
increasingly contesting the unfair 'favouritism'
(easier passage) given to EU exports onto the UK market.
NB the difficulties brexit has placed on Ireland/EU.
IRL now has legal (treaties) duty to *rigorously* apply UCC & SPS controls on an EU *exterior* land border for the member states with *interior* borders.
Johnson agreed to move this *exterior* border for goods between GB & NI
In return Ireland conceded its GFA agreement for a "whole island economy" i.e. NI being in EU single market for goods (not services nor finance) only.
UK Gov clearly trying to 'compromise' Ireland further/out of EU single market with stepped up continental customs & SPS controls

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael M. 🇨🇭🇳🇴🇮🇸🇱🇮🇬🇧

Michael M. 🇨🇭🇳🇴🇮🇸🇱🇮🇬🇧 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @vivamjm

17 Mar
@donnafordyce CEO @SeafoodScotland
said " it is frustrating that the export market wasn’t granted same. We've been begging UK Gov for this for months so were somewhat baffled by the decision to allow it for imports but not vice versa" 
Why are people even in business so stupid?
1/ there *was* the opportunity to give grace period to UK export and UK import (EU export) with a *bilateral* agreed transition extension. UK turned it down last June meaning 2/ each market defaults to determining what is imported onto its market by its own now seperate rules.
EU was ready to legally implement its rules & controls under the TCA treaty on 1/1/21 but UK wasn't ..and still isn't...and won't be until 2022.. What is so "baffling" ?
No country has the gift to determine whether its *exports" are permitted onto another's market
Read 5 tweets
11 Mar
Blog by Dr North
"The FT then asserts that much of this “additional paperwork” will need physical stamp from an authorised vet. This is simply not true. The Regulation (Article 14) states that the “private attestation” has to be prepared and signed by the importing food business
to accompany the consignments of composite products exempt from inspection – as listed in the new regulation. Obviously,details of any attestation will be provided by the UK manufacturer, but legal responsibility lies with the importer. But the FT does not seem to understand this
“The new rules”, it goes on to say, “will land particularly hard on smaller companies that do not have the benefits of economies of scale & the trade in chilled products such as sandwiches & ready meals between the UK and the Republic of Ireland, according to Karin Goodburn of
Read 15 tweets
5 Mar
It won't resolve all issues (ATA carnets; RoO & customs decs themselves) but UK should undoubtedly join (ironically rejoin) EFTA & expand the TCA
into being a new pillar of the EEA/Single Market?? So much pain to get back there (& needs to be accountability for it)...but..Thread
Undoubtedly again the NIP will be a lot easier to negotiate with *all* of the UK part of the Single Market (even if just for goods but clearly better with all 4 freedoms)
Maybe too the TCA can be expanded to include some CU benefits? @EFTA4UK ?
If not UK needs modern fully integrated with (CDS) customs IT systems instead of 35 year old CHIEF & enough adequately trained personnel combined with fit-for-purpose infrastructure.
As it is UK services here to be overwhelmed...unless the smugglers charter is extended.
Read 4 tweets
4 Mar
As the row over the Northern Ireland protocol threatens to become a full-blown diplomatic crisis between the UK and EU, there are new industry warnings that UK supply chains face chaos. Industry wants government to postpone the 1 April implementation of phase 2 border checks.
As part of its 3-phase introduction of border checks on EU imports, UK border officials are set to begin requesting sanitary and phytosanitary paperwork for animal & plant imports next month. However, with the pandemic having floored the hospitality sector, industry associations
and sources have warned of “calamity” if there is no delay to phase 2. MD of Morgan Cargo Herman Bosman said he and his team were “very concerned” about the new checks and phytosanitary inspections. He said: “During many discussions with EU growers, transporters and exporters,
Read 10 tweets
26 Feb
It (NY Times) wrote of the firm of Teal & Mackrill in Hull, which makes paints for special applications, like fishing trawlers & factory floors. In a “little-noticed consequence of the new Brexit trade deal”, this paper said, “the company is facing real concerns about its future
Owner Geoff Mackril said that growing British regulatory burdens on chemicals may mean that eventually he would not be able to obtain some of the additives that make his paints distinctive. “The worry is that some of those materials that we use”, he said, “may become unavailable
because of those costs”.
..if spread across Britain’s £33 bn a year chemical industry, with BASF estimating that UK REACH could cost the company £70 million.
turbulenttimes.co.uk/news/brexit/br…
Read 4 tweets
25 Feb
"I think he comes into his own, the prime minister, with his PR, & if anybody can sell to the British public 'buy red mullet, buy John Dory, buy grey mullet', then I think he will have a darn good go," she told BBC SW political editor Martyn Oates."
Forget he & his Gov lied/lies
Altogether it tells me what a superlative prize the GB public is to the worst conniving, inept, crooked, self serving "government" imaginable... & now in office.
As long as it is headed up by a an outright lying but "funny" clown they can continue manipulating & abusing
the malleable population against its better interests, despite the warnings from (us) 'mere' frontline/experienced experts always becoming fact.
These "freeport" "Private Enterprise" SEZ *Charter Cities* are thus now guaranteed as the "saviour" to a fucked Single Market economy
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!