🚨After years of worker/union-led litigation, #Uber will classify their drivers (NOT riders) in the UK as 'workers' (min wage, holiday pay, union rights & more). Turning point for the #gigeconomy. Battle on definition of 'working time' ahead. Still, wow. ft.com/content/8d3947…
SEC Filing sets out further details 👇🏾
Holiday time based on 12.07% of earnings. Drivers automatically enrolled into a pension plan with contributions from Uber.
So you can have employment rights and flexibility after all!
And here is Dara's op-ed in the Evening Standard. We'll need to analyse what this means in detail, but today is undeniably a MASSIVE day for decent work in the #gigeconomy. Thinking of the drivers, claimants, unions, organisers & lawyers that got us here. standard.co.uk/comment/commen…
See here important response from the two lead claimants highlighting how Uber is avoiding the SC's definition of 'working time' (from when app switched on). V important point on the need for a collectively agreed cost base to calculate NMW.
...Uber's position has always been about a trade-off between employment rights (even if limited under 'worker' status) & flexibility. This shift has implications beyond the UK.
- Will Uber use this play to campaign for IC+/3rd category elsewhere? That will prob not change.
2/
- 'Workers' are entitled to certain employment rights under English law. True to form Uber was selective in which ones they *mentioned* in their PR/SEC filing. More concerning is if/how they will grant those rights w/out a union or proper enforcement