This tweet is absolutely false. The report does not even mention the Hunter Biden laptop or the documents reported on, let alone allege that it came from Russia, let alone provide proof of this. This tweet is disinformation.
The MSNBC host who first spread this tweet subsequently acknowledged that, upon reading the report, he sees that the tweet's claim is untrue because there is no mention of what it alleges:

And, just to review the basic rule of journalism (and basic rationality) once more: even if the US security state had alleged the laptop came from Russia, minimally sane and sober people will not assume that's true absent *evidence." That's what journalistic skepticism means.
For those who harbor reverence for US Govt pronouncements, the only time it commented on the Hunter laptop was when DNI said there was no evidence Russia was involved. That claim came from Brennan-led ex-CIA agents & was laundered by gullible US media:

nbcnews.com/politics/natio…
Good to see this - but look at the first tweet with the false claim about Russia's involvement and see how widespread it is, and that guy has no incentive to delete it because the benefits of the re-tweets and increased followers are too sweet:

Even this guy's walkbacks and concessions are false. He can't admit he just made this up. He did. Usually they rely on the fact that reports like this are very long & people with other jobs don't have time to read them. This one is short: take a look to see how casually they lie.
This is why the biggest fucking scam in media right now are the "disinformation units" of NBC, CNN & NYT. Here's one of their stars who bravely tattles on 4Chan teenagers endorsing and spreading a blatant lie about an issue that actually matters, that everyone now sees is false.
As I wrote today, and I think it's the key truth of US media: "the sectors of the media pretending to be most distraught about “disinformation are, in fact, the most aggressive, prolific and destructive disseminators of that disinformation by far."

greenwald.substack.com/p/how-do-big-m…
If you think the real power centers in the US are the Proud Boys, 4Chan & Boogaloos rather than the CIA, FBI, NSA, Wall Street and Silicon Valley, and spend most of your time battling the former while serving the latter as stenographers, your journalism is definitionally shit.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Glenn Greenwald

Glenn Greenwald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ggreenwald

18 Mar
VIDEO: With Katie Herzog (@kittypurrzog) on the Expansion of LGBTQ Identity and How it is Wielded in Political Discourse

greenwald.substack.com/p/video-with-k…
Any rules of political discourse that subordinate the merit of an argument to the identity of the person advocating it is inherently unhealthy.

The recent demands that LGBT writers be deplatformed from Substack -- in the name of LGBT equality -- illustrates this perversion.
At first glance, this discussion may seem relevant only to a limited audience. But I would like to invite readers to consider that these dynamics, far from being a niche discussion, has broad, even universal, relevance to how our political discourse is being conducted.
Read 6 tweets
17 Mar
Journalists, Illustrating How They Operate, Yesterday Spread a Significant Lie All Over Twitter

greenwald.substack.com/p/journalists-…
Eager to obtain vindication for the pre-election fraud they spread about the Hunter Biden story, journalists falsely claimed that CIA blamed Russia for it. This was a total fabrication that they spread to hundreds of thousands if not millions, with little attempt to rectify it.
Even if this report had asserted the Hunter Biden laptop materials were manufactured by the Kremlin, that would prove nothing. Evidence-free assertions from the U.S. intelligence community merit skepticism, not blind faith — especially from people calling themselves journalists.
Read 6 tweets
17 Mar
Has anyone provided an iota of evidence that what is driving this horrific surge of anti-Asian violence is "white supremacist domestic terror"?

That would require data showing who is primarily perpetrating the violence and with what motive. Where is that?
Please look at how stupid and lowly so many liberals are now. If you ask for evidence to support sweeping but dubious claims about the cause of anti-Asian violence, they won't answer (their brains don't allow that). Instead, they'll call you racist: it's all they know how to do: ImageImageImage
Here's a white historian who has a life where race plays no role other than to exploit it as a fun online toy to casually slander people as racists for refusing to endorse claims without evidence. Contempt is required for them and their tactics:

Read 7 tweets
16 Mar
With their ratings in free fall, they desperately need "the new Trump." They tried to make it Marjorie Taylor Green but nobody cared about a first-term backbencher, so they're now auditioning Tucker for the role. A bit bizarre for cable hosts to elevate another TV host this way:
One earnest question I have:

Why is it OK to devote hours of TV time to maligning and stoking hatred against a cable host (and I do think it's fine), but it's not OK -- it's abusive and violent -- to voice criticisms of a front-page NYT reporter.

What's the principle here?
Tucker Carlson actually had protesters outside his home when his wife and kids were inside. Using the logic now marshalled to place off-limits criticisms of NYT reporters, couldn't he allege that CNN's attacks on him incite harassment and violence?

apnews.com/article/5aa410…
Read 4 tweets
16 Mar
How Do Big Media Outlets So Often "Independently Confirm" Each Other's Falsehoods?

greenwald.substack.com/p/how-do-big-m…
The Washington Post's media-spread error about Trump's Georgia call shows the deceitful playbook first invented to undermine Trump and promote Russiagate.

As they rely upon partisan audiences, news outlets are incentivized to recklessly publish against political enemies.
The worst Trump-era media humiliation was when CNN breathlessly claimed Trump, Jr. got advanced access to the WikiLeaks archive -- all because their "sources" misread an email date.

How did MSNBC & CBS purport to "independently confirm" the same falsehood? It's a key tactic.
Read 4 tweets
16 Mar
Very good analysis explaining the sudden outburst of media animosity toward Substack. In sum:

- Large sectors of digital media are failing.

- Substack writers are thriving.

This is why the former harbors intense resentment toward the latter and wants to delegitimize it.
In order to thrive on Substack, you need your own readership who believes you're offering something unique, informative and compelling that they can't get elsewhere - which is why they'll follow you and even subscribe.

That's exactly what so many resentful media people lack.
It's partially the fault of the climate of the liberal part of the media: allows no dissent or heterodoxy. So their journalist-employees, knowing jobs are sparse, constantly monitor what the liberal consensus is and cling to it for fear of being called names or being ostracized.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!