VIDEO: With Katie Herzog (@kittypurrzog) on the Expansion of LGBTQ Identity and How it is Wielded in Political Discourse

greenwald.substack.com/p/video-with-k…
Any rules of political discourse that subordinate the merit of an argument to the identity of the person advocating it is inherently unhealthy.

The recent demands that LGBT writers be deplatformed from Substack -- in the name of LGBT equality -- illustrates this perversion.
At first glance, this discussion may seem relevant only to a limited audience. But I would like to invite readers to consider that these dynamics, far from being a niche discussion, has broad, even universal, relevance to how our political discourse is being conducted.
Journalists who are both able to speak freely without fear of recrimination or job loss and have smart and original insights to offer are hard to find these days. Katie is most definitely one of those. Our discussion on these trends can be watched here:

greenwald.substack.com/p/video-with-k…
Speaking of this, the censorship campaign aimed at Substack writers has arrived in the newsletter of @brianstelter (he's not advocating it, just reporting it). To be clear, those threatening to leave are not "prominent" but can't attract a readership:

What these dreary Substack censors are saying is this: because you refuse to remove from your platform the writers I hate who have built a very large readership of their own, I'm taking myself & my couple of dozen readers elsewhere in protest. As pathetic as it is repressive.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Glenn Greenwald

Glenn Greenwald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ggreenwald

19 Mar
One of the most viral videos in the country on the day of the Atlanta shootings was one completely doctored in meaning through dishonest editing by @atrupar -- something he has been caught doing so many times. See for yourself. How many did this deceive?
No liberal journalist in corporate media will object to the serial distortions and disinformation from @atrupar's doctored videos because he has the right ideology.

He routinely deceives millions, but they'll only denounce 4Chan teenagers & Facebook boomers who spread memes.
The Vox Video Dunce Disinformation Machine, @atrupar, strikes again. The favorite video dunce of the media people claiming to hate disinformation is the person on Twitter who spreads disinformation the most:

Read 4 tweets
19 Mar
The years-long smear campaign against @jessesingal by a good chunk of the left-liberal media -- fabricating claims that he's a harasser and stalker of transwomen -- is one of the most repulsive things I've seen, yet illustrative of their tactics. Glad to see it getting attention:
Amazing how these obviously false smears from a known fabricator -- who just became LGBT like 4 seconds ago and now uses it to attack life-long LGBT writers -- get printed in every digital media article on the Substack controversy with no questioning:

vox.com/recode/2233880… Image
This is what Brooklyn-based media outlets do: print any accusation against their enemies without the slightest need for evidence or even responses from the accused.

Then if you object to the lies, the journalists who do it cry "harassment," & then wonder why their outlets fail.
Read 7 tweets
17 Mar
Journalists, Illustrating How They Operate, Yesterday Spread a Significant Lie All Over Twitter

greenwald.substack.com/p/journalists-…
Eager to obtain vindication for the pre-election fraud they spread about the Hunter Biden story, journalists falsely claimed that CIA blamed Russia for it. This was a total fabrication that they spread to hundreds of thousands if not millions, with little attempt to rectify it.
Even if this report had asserted the Hunter Biden laptop materials were manufactured by the Kremlin, that would prove nothing. Evidence-free assertions from the U.S. intelligence community merit skepticism, not blind faith — especially from people calling themselves journalists.
Read 6 tweets
17 Mar
Has anyone provided an iota of evidence that what is driving this horrific surge of anti-Asian violence is "white supremacist domestic terror"?

That would require data showing who is primarily perpetrating the violence and with what motive. Where is that?
Please look at how stupid and lowly so many liberals are now. If you ask for evidence to support sweeping but dubious claims about the cause of anti-Asian violence, they won't answer (their brains don't allow that). Instead, they'll call you racist: it's all they know how to do:
Here's a white historian who has a life where race plays no role other than to exploit it as a fun online toy to casually slander people as racists for refusing to endorse claims without evidence. Contempt is required for them and their tactics:

Read 7 tweets
16 Mar
This tweet is absolutely false. The report does not even mention the Hunter Biden laptop or the documents reported on, let alone allege that it came from Russia, let alone provide proof of this. This tweet is disinformation.
The MSNBC host who first spread this tweet subsequently acknowledged that, upon reading the report, he sees that the tweet's claim is untrue because there is no mention of what it alleges:

And, just to review the basic rule of journalism (and basic rationality) once more: even if the US security state had alleged the laptop came from Russia, minimally sane and sober people will not assume that's true absent *evidence." That's what journalistic skepticism means.
Read 9 tweets
16 Mar
With their ratings in free fall, they desperately need "the new Trump." They tried to make it Marjorie Taylor Green but nobody cared about a first-term backbencher, so they're now auditioning Tucker for the role. A bit bizarre for cable hosts to elevate another TV host this way:
One earnest question I have:

Why is it OK to devote hours of TV time to maligning and stoking hatred against a cable host (and I do think it's fine), but it's not OK -- it's abusive and violent -- to voice criticisms of a front-page NYT reporter.

What's the principle here?
Tucker Carlson actually had protesters outside his home when his wife and kids were inside. Using the logic now marshalled to place off-limits criticisms of NYT reporters, couldn't he allege that CNN's attacks on him incite harassment and violence?

apnews.com/article/5aa410…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!