I saw this discussion going on yesterday
Wasn't able to comment for various reasons
There is a lot to unpack here so let's take a step back & look at this objectively & subjectively.
Objectively - the original person is upset because of the way her doctor treated her. She is well within her right to complain & seek alternative options. The person QTing her commented with some friend's comment (hearsay) there by steering the narrative to where she wanted it
Everything else and I mean EVERYTHING else is subjective. If you agree with me till this point then we can carry on. Else I'm afraid you are wasting your time reading on

So let's look at this subjectively. This is where I feel the core of most of the disagreements yesterday were
This is my subjective view

Should the doctor in question have used more appropriate language in her history taking (questioning)?

Yes I feel so. It could have been worded better definitely. We can always improve we can always learn
Sex & marriage are not mutually dependent
However
This is where things get dicey
I know nothing of the people involved
I don't know the background of the people involved
Could both the doctor & the patient be a victim of their upbringing/cultural differences?
We don't know this. Easy to judge both from our own bias.
What if the doctor is from a conservative background culturally? We know that education is not at all connected to liberal or conservative views.
Can we hold it against the doctor for being like that? Depends on our own bias & where we stand in the cultural spectrum.
Let's go back to the questioning itself.

Since I've worked abroad my approach
would have been different. Just after coming back to India had a patient who I asked "are you sexually active"

The immediate reply with righteous indignation was "how dare you I'm not married!"
🤷‍♂️
Now that patient is obviously upset with me. Who knows if she posted the incident on social media. What might have been the response?

This is a delicate issue. And it definitely could have been handled better by a person who claims to be a journalist QTing the original post.
"History taking" is very important in medicine. I can only speculate what the doctor had in mind when asking "are you married"

Off the top of my head the choice of contraception suggested might be different if it was a fixed partner vs multiple partners.
Maybe asking "are you married" seemed more polite than asking "will you be having 1 partner or multiple partners"?
Contraception is not only for preventing pregnancy but also to prevent STDs
So if the doctor was thinking like that then what is wrong with that line of questioning?
Again this is how I might have approached it. But like I said all of this is subjective and speculation. We aren't hearing from the doctor in question. So ... 🤷‍♂️
At the end of the day it is far easier for us to imagine the worst in someone than to consider the good in someone.

I'm not saying all doctors are completely innocent. There are bad apples in every field. But I want to believe the good outnumber the bad by a massive margin 🙏

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan👨‍⚕️⚕️

Jonathan👨‍⚕️⚕️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @just1doctorwala

16 Mar
Classic case of generalizing based on anecdotal evidence
There are Christians who believe they shouldn't eat food which is blessed in another religion & there are those who don't care just like there are Hindus who eat beef & there are Hindus who don't

To each their own🤷‍♂️
I will never understand this obsession by certain folks about what is on their neighbour's plates. Why does it matter to you? Like seriously i just don't get it.
just as in any religion
you have extremist fanatical followers on one end & liberal laissez faire followers on the other

I have eaten Sabarimala Aravana from colleagues who have climbed up the mountain, and have seen other colleagues who have refused. Why take it personally?
Read 4 tweets
6 Mar
hey India,

It's 2021,

Let's talk about sexual consent!

There are so many misnomers and misconceptions

Even our legal statutes on this issue needs to be updated

#thread
What is sexual consent?
Sexual consent is where a person has the freedom to agree to sexual activity. It is vital the person instigating sex makes sure their partner is participating freely and readily.

To have sex without consent is to commit rape.
Responsibility for rape rests solely with the perpetrator. The below attributes do not automatically mean consent to sex.

1. Dating, flirting, kissing or being friendly or intimate does not mean consent
Read 14 tweets
3 Mar
Got on WhatsApp
Removed number because I will NOT promote this
20 duties 10 hours each for ₹25k/month
Literally works out to ₹125 an hour
Tell me any other job you know pays less than ₹125 an hour?
Remind me how doctors can be called greedy when this is the pay offered 😞 Image
You may have seen some super famous doctors driving around in big fancy expensive luxury vehicles. Those are the exceptions rather than the norm. Most of them were already from affluent backgrounds. Find me a doctor who made it that big starting from nothing at all. 🤷‍♂️😔
Government doesn't pay for healthcare. Salaries are low. Doctors forced to go for private hospitals. Private hospitals will milk the doctors dry with long hours & ridiculously low pay. The private hospitals will charge exorbitant amounts from patients to meet their profit targets
Read 4 tweets
3 Mar
Every day a new low 😞

India is now only 'partly free' under Modi, says report bbc.com/news/world-asi…
US-based Freedom House, a non-profit organisation which conducts research on political freedom and human rights, added that the number of countries designated as "not free" was at its highest level since 2006.
It added that India's "fall from the upper ranks of free nations" could have a more damaging effect on the world's democratic standards.
Read 4 tweets
3 Mar
A summary of the phase 3 trial results released by Bharat Biotech
#covaxin
#COVID19Vaccination

Bharat Biotech Announces Phase 3 Results of COVAXIN®:

India’s First COVID-19 Vaccine Demonstrates Interim Clinical
Efficacy of 81% ImageImage
 Data from 25,800 participants, received vaccine or placebo in a 1:1 ratio showed that
the vaccine candidate was well tolerated.
 COVAXIN® demonstrated 81% interim efficacy in preventing COVID-19 in those without
prior infection after the second dose.
Read 12 tweets
12 Feb
Bajrang Dal "terrorists"

there corrected it for you 🙏

tagging someone's employees because you didn't like her random tweet?
petty and immature
but then again what else should we expect from the riot wing loonies.
tell me now that Delhi police is lying
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!