Hi - I can confirm I will be live-tweeting the Depp v NGN appeal application hearing tomorrow.

It will begin at 1000 GMT in Court 71 of Royal Courts of Justice in London. It is being broadcast live, for free on YouTube. Link to follow.
(Court 71 is one of those grim-looking modern courts bolted on to the back of the gothic splendour of the original RCJ buildings where the original Depp v NGN trial was heard. They new courts do tend to have much better acoustics, though.)
I have requested, and hope to receive the parties’ skeleton arguments and any other relevant documentation once the hearing is underway.
The hearing is an application to appeal Mr Justice Nicol’s High Court judgment which found the Sun Newspaper’s allegations that Johnny Depp engaged in domestic violence to be “substantially true”.
Mr Depp’s team will be hoping to successfully adduce new evidence into the appeal application in support of the general grounds of appeal which were filed over Christmas…
(and which you can read here nickwallis.com/courtofappeal - don’t forget to click the pop-up blocker symbol in your menu bar of your browser, it is default on if you are using Safari).
The NGN team will no doubt be seeking to persuade the court that Mr Nicol’s judgment is sound and should stand.
The new evidence will take the form of witness statements. The hearing is listed for two hours. It may overrun. The court may give judgment tomorrow, it might reserve it for a later date, which will not likely be given. Hearings of this nature are rare.
If the court accepts any one of the grounds of appeal (including those grounds affected by the adduction of new evidence via the witness statements) is substantial enough to merit an appeal, it will order one.
There will then be a two or three day appeal hearing at the Court of Appeal at some point in the future, during which Mr Depp’s lawyers will argue the case for a retrial.
If the appeal application is thrown out, that is the end of the road for Mr Depp via the courts in this case in the UK. Mr Nicol’s ruling will stand.
As I have said above, tomorrow’s hearing is being broadcast live on YouTube. Before I give you the link, please note…

“… the re-use, capture, re-editing or distribution of the footage in any form is not permitted.”
If you do choose to do any of the above, you could be done for breach of copyright, defamation or even contempt of court, a potential criminal offence.
Furthermore if you retweet or otherwise share someone else’s edit/broadcast/report of the YouTube feed you could be deep legal doodoo. My advice, particularly for people in the UK, is do not do ANYTHING with tomorrow’s feed, except watch it.
Just so you know - there is an identical feed being sent to broadcasters. The recipients of that feed to have permission to record it and make it part of a report or presentation provided they adhere by strict legal rules (to do with fairness and accuracy).
Well - in fact, this is the specific law:

"11(1) A report or presentation of proceedings that includes a broadcast of a hearing must be fair and accurate having regard to:
 
(a)the overall content of the report or presentation; and
(b) the context in which the broadcast is presented.”

11(2) A broadcast must not be for the purposes of:
(a) a party political broadcast;

(b) advertisement or promotion, except where such advertisement or promotion relates to a report or presentation of proceedings that includes a broadcast;

(c) light entertainment; or

(d) satire.”
Retweeting or resharing reports made by accredited broadcasters I think is legally okay, but I’m not going to do it, just in case. If you are not sure of your position, get legal advice before doing anything.
Here, then, is the link to Court 71’s very own YouTube page: youtube.com/channel/UCvLfI…

Another thing: A court order is being sought which would restrict the public dissemination of certain documents (or elements of certain documents) and...
reporting discussions pertaining to those documents in the hearing tomorrow. It will likely succeed. I suspect this means the public YouTube feed will be switched off whilst these discussions are taking place. I will also not be able to report any element of them.
It’s taken me a good few hours to pull all this information together and I am reasonably certain it is accurate, but please accept my advance apologies for any mistakes.
I have crowdfunded my reporting of the Depp v NGN case - if you would like to make a small contribution to the tip jar to cover the time costs of doing do today or tomorrow, I would be enormously grateful. The link is here:

store29806256.company.site
I realise asking you to make a donation to help me tweet something you can watch live for free on YouTube is a big ask (especially as I suspect plenty of other people are going to be doing exactly the same), but hopefully you’ll find what I’m putting out of some value.
You can use the same link (store29806256.company.site) to buy my forthcoming book if you’re interested - but I am afraid it’s not about Depp v NGN!

See you at 1000 GMT tomorrow.
I've already got something wrong.

The hearing starts at 1030 GMT.

Ace journalism once more.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nick Wallis

Nick Wallis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nickwallis

18 Mar
[Just now looking at NGN’s response]

"the Appellant contends that the “fresh” evidence relating to the donations supports a theory that Ms Heard was a ‘gold-digger’; and that the ‘gold-digger’ thesis explains why Ms Heard had over the course of her 5-year relationship...
… with the Appellant carefully constructed a ‘hoax’ to demonstrate that he had committed multiple acts of violence against her. It is also said by the Appellant that the “fresh” evidence would have...
… undermined Ms Heard’s credibility with the inevitable result that the judge would have reached a different decision about the 12 assaults (out of the 14 pleaded assaults) he found the Appellant to have perpetrated.
Read 63 tweets
18 Mar
Court 71 obviously haven’t got their feed up, unless anyone has a link which is working….?
Okay I’ll email the press office.
Okay we are go - it’s live:

Read 88 tweets
18 Mar
NEW: The Government has been forced into announcing it will pay for Post Office Historical Shortfall Scheme stating: "The Scheme closed in August 2020 and received over 2,400 applications. This number was higher than the Post Office had anticipated...
… when the Scheme was established… However, the cost of the Scheme is beyond what the business can afford. The Government will therefore provide sufficient financial support to Post Office to ensure that the Scheme can proceed, based on current expectations of the likely cost."
It has been forced to make this announcement because the source of funding for the HSS was actually revealed in last week’s Judicial Review application hearing. The application was turned down because the scheme was deemed to be a matter of private law (and therefore not...
Read 6 tweets
6 Jan
Hello. Another world exclusive for you follows. I have the NGN and Wootton response to Johnny Depp’s application for permission to appeal the UK High Court ruling against him.
The ruling was handed down by Mr Justice Nicol on 2 November last year. He found that the Sun Newspaper’s allegation that Mr Depp was a wife-beater was “substantially true” - therefore Mr Depp’s libel claim...
… against the Sun newspaper’s parent company and the journalist who wrote the piece had failed.
Read 50 tweets
23 Dec 20
Attn followers of the Johnny Depp v NGN and Wootton legal battle:

An early Christmas present for you. I think this is a world exclusive...
Mr Depp’s representatives have filed two documents to the Court of Appeal at the Royal Courts of Justice, London, England, seeking leave to appeal Mr Justice Nicol’s High Court ruling.
That ruling, handed down on 2 November this year found the Sun newspaper’s claims that Johnny Depp was a wife-beater to be “substantially true”.
Read 348 tweets
17 Dec 20
Good morning and welcome to court 4 of the Royal Courts of Justice, pictured from Waterloo Bridge. It’s a stunning day, London is empty, but the court is busy to hear legal argument over 41 Subposmasters hoping to have their criminal convcitions overturned…

#PostOfficeScandal
… I will be live-tweeting proceedings, hopefully abetted by the various skeleton arguments which I have asked to be supplied by the various teams of counsel present today. Words of warning….
… my tweets only SUMMARIZE what is being said or going on in court. My legal responsibilities are to be contemporaneous, accurate and fair. Nothing is VERBATIM unless it is in “direct quotes”, which only happens when someone speaks very slowly and then there is a pause. So...
Read 167 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!