NEW: The Government has been forced into announcing it will pay for Post Office Historical Shortfall Scheme stating: "The Scheme closed in August 2020 and received over 2,400 applications. This number was higher than the Post Office had anticipated...
… when the Scheme was established… However, the cost of the Scheme is beyond what the business can afford. The Government will therefore provide sufficient financial support to Post Office to ensure that the Scheme can proceed, based on current expectations of the likely cost."
It has been forced to make this announcement because the source of funding for the HSS was actually revealed in last week’s Judicial Review application hearing. The application was turned down because the scheme was deemed to be a matter of private law (and therefore not...
… amenable to a Judicial Review, despite the Post Office being owned 100% by the government AND having the scheme paid for by the government and reviewed by a government inquiry.
Today’s announcement was made as a written ministerial statement by @scullyp, and can be found here: questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statem…

#PostOfficeScandal
@scullyp Note in the statement that the government is still maintaining that the Postmasters who brought the High Court case which cracked this scandal open are not eligible for further compensation despite most of their settlement being swallowed in legal fees.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nick Wallis

Nick Wallis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nickwallis

18 Mar
[Just now looking at NGN’s response]

"the Appellant contends that the “fresh” evidence relating to the donations supports a theory that Ms Heard was a ‘gold-digger’; and that the ‘gold-digger’ thesis explains why Ms Heard had over the course of her 5-year relationship...
… with the Appellant carefully constructed a ‘hoax’ to demonstrate that he had committed multiple acts of violence against her. It is also said by the Appellant that the “fresh” evidence would have...
… undermined Ms Heard’s credibility with the inevitable result that the judge would have reached a different decision about the 12 assaults (out of the 14 pleaded assaults) he found the Appellant to have perpetrated.
Read 63 tweets
18 Mar
Court 71 obviously haven’t got their feed up, unless anyone has a link which is working….?
Okay I’ll email the press office.
Okay we are go - it’s live:

Read 88 tweets
17 Mar
Hi - I can confirm I will be live-tweeting the Depp v NGN appeal application hearing tomorrow.

It will begin at 1000 GMT in Court 71 of Royal Courts of Justice in London. It is being broadcast live, for free on YouTube. Link to follow.
(Court 71 is one of those grim-looking modern courts bolted on to the back of the gothic splendour of the original RCJ buildings where the original Depp v NGN trial was heard. They new courts do tend to have much better acoustics, though.)
I have requested, and hope to receive the parties’ skeleton arguments and any other relevant documentation once the hearing is underway.
Read 26 tweets
6 Jan
Hello. Another world exclusive for you follows. I have the NGN and Wootton response to Johnny Depp’s application for permission to appeal the UK High Court ruling against him.
The ruling was handed down by Mr Justice Nicol on 2 November last year. He found that the Sun Newspaper’s allegation that Mr Depp was a wife-beater was “substantially true” - therefore Mr Depp’s libel claim...
… against the Sun newspaper’s parent company and the journalist who wrote the piece had failed.
Read 50 tweets
23 Dec 20
Attn followers of the Johnny Depp v NGN and Wootton legal battle:

An early Christmas present for you. I think this is a world exclusive...
Mr Depp’s representatives have filed two documents to the Court of Appeal at the Royal Courts of Justice, London, England, seeking leave to appeal Mr Justice Nicol’s High Court ruling.
That ruling, handed down on 2 November this year found the Sun newspaper’s claims that Johnny Depp was a wife-beater to be “substantially true”.
Read 348 tweets
17 Dec 20
Good morning and welcome to court 4 of the Royal Courts of Justice, pictured from Waterloo Bridge. It’s a stunning day, London is empty, but the court is busy to hear legal argument over 41 Subposmasters hoping to have their criminal convcitions overturned…

#PostOfficeScandal
… I will be live-tweeting proceedings, hopefully abetted by the various skeleton arguments which I have asked to be supplied by the various teams of counsel present today. Words of warning….
… my tweets only SUMMARIZE what is being said or going on in court. My legal responsibilities are to be contemporaneous, accurate and fair. Nothing is VERBATIM unless it is in “direct quotes”, which only happens when someone speaks very slowly and then there is a pause. So...
Read 167 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!