NEW: The Government has been forced into announcing it will pay for Post Office Historical Shortfall Scheme stating: "The Scheme closed in August 2020 and received over 2,400 applications. This number was higher than the Post Office had anticipated...
… when the Scheme was established… However, the cost of the Scheme is beyond what the business can afford. The Government will therefore provide sufficient financial support to Post Office to ensure that the Scheme can proceed, based on current expectations of the likely cost."
It has been forced to make this announcement because the source of funding for the HSS was actually revealed in last week’s Judicial Review application hearing. The application was turned down because the scheme was deemed to be a matter of private law (and therefore not...
… amenable to a Judicial Review, despite the Post Office being owned 100% by the government AND having the scheme paid for by the government and reviewed by a government inquiry.
@scullyp Note in the statement that the government is still maintaining that the Postmasters who brought the High Court case which cracked this scandal open are not eligible for further compensation despite most of their settlement being swallowed in legal fees.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"the Appellant contends that the “fresh” evidence relating to the donations supports a theory that Ms Heard was a ‘gold-digger’; and that the ‘gold-digger’ thesis explains why Ms Heard had over the course of her 5-year relationship...
… with the Appellant carefully constructed a ‘hoax’ to demonstrate that he had committed multiple acts of violence against her. It is also said by the Appellant that the “fresh” evidence would have...
… undermined Ms Heard’s credibility with the inevitable result that the judge would have reached a different decision about the 12 assaults (out of the 14 pleaded assaults) he found the Appellant to have perpetrated.
Hi - I can confirm I will be live-tweeting the Depp v NGN appeal application hearing tomorrow.
It will begin at 1000 GMT in Court 71 of Royal Courts of Justice in London. It is being broadcast live, for free on YouTube. Link to follow.
(Court 71 is one of those grim-looking modern courts bolted on to the back of the gothic splendour of the original RCJ buildings where the original Depp v NGN trial was heard. They new courts do tend to have much better acoustics, though.)
I have requested, and hope to receive the parties’ skeleton arguments and any other relevant documentation once the hearing is underway.
Hello. Another world exclusive for you follows. I have the NGN and Wootton response to Johnny Depp’s application for permission to appeal the UK High Court ruling against him.
The ruling was handed down by Mr Justice Nicol on 2 November last year. He found that the Sun Newspaper’s allegation that Mr Depp was a wife-beater was “substantially true” - therefore Mr Depp’s libel claim...
… against the Sun newspaper’s parent company and the journalist who wrote the piece had failed.
Attn followers of the Johnny Depp v NGN and Wootton legal battle:
An early Christmas present for you. I think this is a world exclusive...
Mr Depp’s representatives have filed two documents to the Court of Appeal at the Royal Courts of Justice, London, England, seeking leave to appeal Mr Justice Nicol’s High Court ruling.
That ruling, handed down on 2 November this year found the Sun newspaper’s claims that Johnny Depp was a wife-beater to be “substantially true”.
Good morning and welcome to court 4 of the Royal Courts of Justice, pictured from Waterloo Bridge. It’s a stunning day, London is empty, but the court is busy to hear legal argument over 41 Subposmasters hoping to have their criminal convcitions overturned…
… I will be live-tweeting proceedings, hopefully abetted by the various skeleton arguments which I have asked to be supplied by the various teams of counsel present today. Words of warning….
… my tweets only SUMMARIZE what is being said or going on in court. My legal responsibilities are to be contemporaneous, accurate and fair. Nothing is VERBATIM unless it is in “direct quotes”, which only happens when someone speaks very slowly and then there is a pause. So...