[thread] This article is anti-science drivel. Inane, misleading bullshit from start to finish. The people who advocate for putting males in female sports have no case. No argument. Nothing. They know it. So they give us this. I can't stress enough how bad their argument is:
Their "proof" that boys don't have an advantage over girls is that some girls can still beat boys in sports. This does not at all even come close to refuting the fact that boys have biological advantages.
They leave out the fact that, in the case cited, the biological males competing against girls in track and field were getting gold and silver medals with times that wouldn't have even qualified for the finals in the boys bracket. THAT'S the advantage. Clear as day.
The article says that the advantage males have -- an advantage which they were just denying exists -- is balanced out by a small minority of girls who have elevated testosterone. Uh, what? Also, testosterone is but ONE of the physical advantage. And not the biggest one.
That's all the scientific evidence they attempt to present. From there, it's a bunch of pablum about how "transgirls" will be emotionally damaged if they aren't allowed to compete against biological females.
Once again, the emotional damage to females who have their privacy invaded and opportunities stolen is not acknowledged at all.
So, as always, the champions of transgenderism demand that we throw all science to the side, and everyone else's feelings to the side, and submit to the feelings of a tiny minority of people. This is both morally deranged and logically incoherent. Any sane person can see that.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The number of kids who identify as LGBT, especially trans and bisexual, has absolutely skyrocketed. If you think this is a natural or organic development, you're deluded. The media, Hollywood, and the school system actively recruit children into the LGBT ranks.
The number of supposedly "trans" children and young adults is TEN TIMES HIGHER than the number among older generations. Do you think that's because a lot more people are born in the wrong body these days (whatever the hell that even means)? No, this is social engineering.
Finally watched Hillbilly Elegy last night. Really solid, well made film with powerful performances. Absurd that the critics panned it. Film critics continue to discredit themselves.
I can only assume that they had to find a reason to dislike it because the film makes the white privilege narrative look ridiculous.
The common theme I read in the reviews is that the characters are “cartoonish” and “caricatures.” That’s not even remotely true. All of the characters rang true. Nothing cartoonish about them at all.
So do they just not treat the roads at all before ice storms in the south? Is that considered a wimpy northern thing around these parts?
Literally cars sliding all over the road. Hitting guardrails and each other. Easily avoidable if you just put some salt down. Might be something to think about!
I’m also watching drivers speed down the road like it’s sunny and warm out. Perfect combination. No salt on the road and drivers who apparently don’t understand that ice is slippery.
We are told that the DC riot killed five people. Sometimes seven deaths are linked to the riot. But here’s the truth, as far as we’ve been officially told:
Of seven deaths, two were officers who committed suicide after the riot. We have never been given any evidence or any reason to believe that their suicides had anything to do with the riot. This is simply an assumption that many have made.
Of the five who died in or shortly after the riot, one was a man with a pre existing condition who suffered a heart attack. Another suffered a stroke at some point that day and died in a hospital.
People comparing this to the famous hot coffee lawsuit against McDonald's. That lawsuit was justified. McDonald's was serving near-boiling coffee and knew it was unsafe. The woman who sued was nearly killed by her burns. This moron, on the other hand, put glue in her own hair.
The woman in the McDonald's lawsuit just wanted them to pay her ER bills. They refused and so she sued and won. Then McDonald's ran a disinformation campaign for years to skew public perception of the case. They were totally in the wrong every step of the way.
Everyone knows coffee is hot, obviously. But no sane person wants their coffee so hot that it could permanently disfigure or potentially kill them. That's how hot the McDonald's coffee was. And they kept it that way after hundreds of injuries.