The subject of this twitter thread is US Military airfield engineering in the Pacific War and several documents I uncovered answering a RFI from the Australian War Memorial via a US Army officer I know. 1/
Australian War Memorial requested information on the US Army's 43rd Engineer Battalion and their participation in the Battle of Milne Bay, August through September 1942.
I was pinged by the US officer, who is in Oz right now, to help. 2/
According to the wiki the 43rd "was activated at Fort Snelling, Minnesota on 10 February 1941, before being redesignated on 16 March 1943 as the 43rd Engineer General Service Regiment. 3/
The 1st and 2nd Btns were disbanded on 22 Apr 1944 in Australia with the remainder of the regiment reorganized & redesignated as the 43rd Engineer Construction Battalion on 9 May 1944."
This "change and reorganize" game makes finding specific unit history a cast iron b-tch. 4/
My usual go-to source for US Army unit histories is the WWII Operational Documents Section of the Ike Skelton Combined Arms Library Digital Library. 5/
Each US Army battalion or larger organization was supposed to send a unit history to GHQ SWPA upon reorganization/transformation, to be sent later to the War Department. MacArthur's General Headquarters could not be bothered with such things until late 1943. 7/
Then I had my "A-hah!" moment.
The SWPA Chief Engineer Maj. Gen. Hugh J. Casey, a native Kansan, did an eight volume history of SWPA engineer operations as part of an audition to become the head of the US Army Corps of Engineers in the Truman Administration.
He failed. 8/
But the Hathitrust web site (hathitrust.org) had a copy of Engineers of the Southwest Pacific Volume Six Airfield and Base Development.
I tried to use a Google search to find Vol. 6 on the Hathitrust site. Then I found Google has gotten jealous of Hathitrust. 9/
Google is now playing Hathitrust's game by putting old WW2 gov't documents on-line and it directed me here instead:
Engineers of the Southwest Pacific, 1941-1945: Airfield and Base Development, By Hugh John Casey, United States Army Forces, Pacific 10/
You can find the buildup of Milne Bay infrastructure -- to include the 43rd Engineer Battalions role there -- on pages 104 - 116 in the previous tweet's link. 11/
In all of the above I also found a series of reports airfields titled:
Report of trip to the (Name) Pacific Theater of Operations with reference to planning, dispersion, construction, landing mat, concealment, camouflage, maintenance and operations, etc 12/
This is the first of the three:
Report on observations in the Central Pacific Theater of Operations, 25 January 1944. 13/
The expansion of Allied airfields on Guadalcanal by January 1944 has to be seen to be believed.
These photos are of Henderson Field, Navy Fighter strip one, plus Fighter strips one and two. 17/
These photos are of Carnet Field and Bomber Strip Two. 18/
What stood out for me was the section on Japanese Aerial Tactics.
The Japanese Okinawa Campaign tactic of following Allied air raids into the landing pattern at night, & the 1st Japanese use of Chaff/Window in 1943, are both mentioned and described respectively in Jan 1944. 19/
This is the final report of the series:
Report on observations in the Central Pacific Theater of Operations, 25 January 1944. 20/
The difference in panicked but through airfield construction between Hawaii & adjacent islands vs. the South/SW Pacific is stark. Every kind of surface matting is used in Hawaii, even on Golf courses! 21/
The amount of engineering effort into Hawaii airfield camouflage, revetments, and decoys was mind boggling. 22/
Canton Island, to the Southwest of the Hawaiian Islands, got a similar treatment for aircraft & their revetments.
The SCR-270 radar was not only camouflaged with sand paint, a complete 100% fidelity decoy antenna was constructed to divert attacks. 23/
Looking across these WW2 documents and the current headlines with China.
Welcome to the 3rd thread examining the Far Eastern Air Forces report Air Technical Intelligence Group (ATIG) No. 153 Japanese Radar Countermeasures that covered Japanese electronic warfare in WW2. 1/
@GoodClearTweets@CalumDouglas1@militaryhistori Another book to go with those three economic tomes is John Stubbington's “Kept in the Dark – The Denial to Bomber Command of Vital Ultra and Other Intelligence During World War II.”
@GoodClearTweets@CalumDouglas1@militaryhistori “Kept in the Dark” is -NOT- light reading. There is a lot of organizational ground to cover in documenting the growth of the UK’s wartime intelligence structure supporting the Combined Bomber Offensive. And explaining how it came about that the UK Air Ministry didn’t provide...
While at the same time it did so with British military over seas commands and first the American 8th Air Force and later the United States Strategic Air Force in England.
Understanding the full impact of the strategic bombing requires a deep understanding of the major economies involved in WW2. Pretty much everything academic military history thought it knew about WW2's economics, and by extension strategic bombing, was..
This is a 2nd thread on the FEAF's Air Technical Intelligence Group (ATIG) Report No. 153 Japanese Radar Countermeaures. It covers Japanese radar dipole decoys in WW2 1/
This was the previous thread on Japanese radar intelligence.
This is the part of the "Standard Narrative" of WW2 Japanese radar decoys from Alfred Price's PhD thesis on the IJA's use of radar decoys against a US radar in China. 2/
The late Dr Price was a both a great archival historian and as a officer on the RAF's electronic warfare desk in the 1960's. He knew everyone who was anyone in E.W. from that era.
But he didn't have ATIG No. 153 to read when he wrote his thesis or revised it in book form. 3/
This thread is another visitation to the post VJ-Day Joint Chiefs of Staff historical squeegee, Japanese electronic warfare edition. 1/
Back in December 2019 I got and Air Force Historical Research Association microfilm reel with the FEAF's Air Technical Intelligence Group (ATIG) No. 153 Japanese Radar Countermeaures report in it. 2/
This is an immediate post-war report on the Japanese ECM decoys and jammers plus the radar intelligence supporting same.
I'll break my review of this up into several messages. 3/
This thread is going to be about explaining Radar & Photo Intelligence in the Pacific War
Some of what follows was in previous threads (link), but need further narrative to explain the context of GHQ SWPA Section 22 in the WW2 intelligence community.
There was a whole lot of strange in how the US Military did what we call ELINT type intelligence today, during WW2. There was no Washington DC or Pacific Theater equivalent of R.V. Jones Air Ministry "Scientific Intelligence'" or today's DIA doing the ELINT function.
Section 22 was utterly unique as an ELINT intelligence agency in the US Military in WW2.
Quite literally the only people in the USA who really *understood* Section 22 reports were the MIT Rad Lab guys in the liaison office that became...