This thread is another visitation to the post VJ-Day Joint Chiefs of Staff historical squeegee, Japanese electronic warfare edition. 1/
Back in December 2019 I got and Air Force Historical Research Association microfilm reel with the FEAF's Air Technical Intelligence Group (ATIG) No. 153 Japanese Radar Countermeaures report in it. 2/
This is an immediate post-war report on the Japanese ECM decoys and jammers plus the radar intelligence supporting same.
I'll break my review of this up into several messages. 3/
First, Radar intelligence.
Confirmed:
- The Japanese learned much from captured in the Philippines SCR-270 and SCR-268 radars. (Std Narrative)
- The Japanese were given intelligence from the Germans as to all Allied radar frequencies in 1942. (Std Narrative) 4/
- The Japanese at Rabaul had Allied IFF equipment and frequencies cold by April 1943 (Mk II IFF) and by May 1943 had all IFF codes (Mk III) identified. (New) 5/
- The Japanese appear to have tortured Allied POWs and captured tech manuals on planes on all allied airborne radars used in/near Rabaul including those with 10CM radar sets.(New) 6/
- In April 1944 German intelligence on UK H2S radars arrived. (Std Narrative regards happening, not when)
- In August 1944 the Japanese captured an AN/APQ-13 3cm radar and PPI scope from a ditched China based B-29 in Amura Bay, Kyushu. (New) 7/
- USN & USMC Night fighters had poor light discipline approaching Japanese night bombers and the Japanese indeed had a tail warning radar. (New -- but I have some troubles with both reports) 8/
- The Japanese night bombers had 25 cm window at Okinawa. (New)
- The Japanese were reusing B-29 dropped "Rope" decoys over Okinawa. (New) 9/
- The Japanese had deep knowledge of all the radar, radio beacons & check points plus associated communication procedures for the B-29 campaign over Japan. (New, see also POW abuse above) 10/
- The Japanese had reconstructed four AN/APQ-13 three centimeter radar sets from various and sundry crashed B-29's by the end of WW2 and lost them in another B-29 raid (Std Narrative) 11/
- The Japanese Army had developed a complete suite of jammers for all of the B-29 equipment above set for deployment in Oct 1945, (not only New, but paradigm busting) 12/
Disappointments:
- No mention of captured British radar and radar documents with Singapore.
- No mention how the Japanese got USN 57cm and 25cm night fighter aerial radar frequencies. 12/
Now the JCS squeegee moment.
The Japanese Radar 'standard narrative' acknowledges that the Japanese captured PPI scopes from USAAF B-29's. 13/
Now we know the American Joint Chiefs of Staff had solid & reliable information the Japanese captured a B-29 PPI scope in August 1944. 14/
They also knew from February 1945 7th Fleet interrogation of a Chief Perry Officer from Admiral Kurita's cruiser HIJMS ATAGO that she had a PPI scope in October 1944. 15/
The FEAF spent much time interrogating Japanese military officials about whether captured Allied IFF sets were used with less data.
Why didn't the post-war US Military interrogations of the Japanese ask whether the Japanese put a captured B-29 PPI scope on the HIJMS ATAGO? /End
P.S.
The tweet thread threw up over posting these pages I reviewed from the Japanese countermeasures report with the rest. So here they are now.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is a 2nd thread on the FEAF's Air Technical Intelligence Group (ATIG) Report No. 153 Japanese Radar Countermeaures. It covers Japanese radar dipole decoys in WW2 1/
This was the previous thread on Japanese radar intelligence.
This is the part of the "Standard Narrative" of WW2 Japanese radar decoys from Alfred Price's PhD thesis on the IJA's use of radar decoys against a US radar in China. 2/
The late Dr Price was a both a great archival historian and as a officer on the RAF's electronic warfare desk in the 1960's. He knew everyone who was anyone in E.W. from that era.
But he didn't have ATIG No. 153 to read when he wrote his thesis or revised it in book form. 3/
This thread is going to be about explaining Radar & Photo Intelligence in the Pacific War
Some of what follows was in previous threads (link), but need further narrative to explain the context of GHQ SWPA Section 22 in the WW2 intelligence community.
There was a whole lot of strange in how the US Military did what we call ELINT type intelligence today, during WW2. There was no Washington DC or Pacific Theater equivalent of R.V. Jones Air Ministry "Scientific Intelligence'" or today's DIA doing the ELINT function.
Section 22 was utterly unique as an ELINT intelligence agency in the US Military in WW2.
Quite literally the only people in the USA who really *understood* Section 22 reports were the MIT Rad Lab guys in the liaison office that became...
Welcome to the sixth and final twitter thread (Feb 24, 2021) in the “Section 22 Week” count down to the 24 Feb 2021 premiere of the Bilge Pumps podcast with the Section 22 Special Interest Group e-mail list.
Welcome to the 5th Twitter comment thread (Feb 23, 2021) in the “Section 22 Week” count down to the 24 Feb 2021 Bilge Pumps podcast with the Section 22 e-mail list.
Slides 61 through 72 of 82 of the Section 22 Powerpoint information packet are in the slide thread. /1
These slides cover Section 22’s part of the planned invasion of the Japanese home islands called “Operation Olympic,” the last RCM flight of WW2 by the successor of Field Unit #6 that ended in tragedy, the “Defenestration”/2
...(being “thrown out the window” of the official historical narrative) of Section 22 by the American Joint Chiefs of Staff with the “Seventeen guys on an e-mail list” credits and resource links for further research for naval history academics./3
Welcome to the fourth Twitter comment post (Feb 22, 2021) in the “Section 22 Week” count down to the 24 Feb 2021 Bilge Pumps podcast with the Section 22 Special Interest Group e-mail list. Today’s post will include slides 49 through 60 of 82 of the Section 22 information packet.
These Powerpoint slides cover Section 22 combat operations from January to July 1945. Today's cost posts are: