Share this page!

Wilfred Reilly Profile picture
Twitter logo
18 Mar, 4 tweets, 1 min read
This is an actual breakdown of the most recent available national data concerning violence against Asians.
(2) It's interesting that I'm not really dunking on any one group here. Violence against Asians - the last line of the chart - is remarkably diverse: 27.5% Black, 24.1% white, 21.4% Hispanic and "other," and only ~24% ASIAN. But, the "white supremacy" thesis is weak.
(3) This an interesting example of stories we choose NOT to tell. The white-on-Black crime that causes media hysterics is only 10-11% of crime v. Blacks. Even B-on-w crime is max 16% of crime v whites. Anti-Asian crime is 75% (!!!) inter-race; no one cared until this Spring.
(4) For those saying "Perp race could have dramatically changed between years 2-3 OF the Trump admin and today (!)," that surely is theoretically possible. Check out perp race in the top 100-200 cases to return for "anti-Asian violence" on Google/Bing, and tell me what you find!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Wilfred Reilly

Wilfred Reilly Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wil_da_beast630

Wilfred Reilly Profile picture
9 Mar
Serious if unoriginal question: why are the people/rulers of mighty nations "of color," like Japan, China, Ethiopia, Nigeria, India, Mongolia, Arabia and the UAE...just etc...never referred to as "colonizers?"
(2) I ask this partly to troll SJWs...but also because I'm not ashamed "our" Generals batted .499 against "the whites" - and would have hit for a much higher average if the Great Khans hadn't run into syphilis. Defeat isn't some kind of mark of sophistication.
(3) It has been noted that I "just straight-up ignored" the Ottoman, Moorish, Musan, and post-Muhammad Muslim conquests. Good point. I see you TOO, Turkey, Syria, Egypt, Morocco, and Mali!!! #more_colonizers
Read 4 tweets
Wilfred Reilly Profile picture
24 Feb
There is no logical/mathematical argument that people should take an anti-viral vaccine that is 95+% effective - per Israeli data - against a virus that itself poses a 1/5,000 risk of death to healthy non-seniors...and then continue wearing 2-3 face masks and socially isolating.
(2) I keep saying this, because the underlying argument here is so dangerous for freedom: "If you have a 1/20 chance...of causing me a 1/5K risk...given (say) 1/100 odds you HAVE The Thing on Day X...stay inside!!!"

This logic could be used to ban literally anything.
(3) For those saying my first post only breaks down the risks to ME...ok: the risk you pose to someone ELSE post vaxx would be (1/20+ (your daily risk of having COVID) x 1/200-5,000 (average risk to them) x 1/20+ (vaccine risk reduction)). That's a 1/80,000 to 1/2,000,000 risk.
Read 5 tweets
Wilfred Reilly Profile picture
24 Feb
The idea that there are words that cannot even be mentioned when condemning them is just Voldemort-level bullshit. Magic isn't real, gang.
(2) In the absence of many real - or, at least, perceivable - problems of racial/regional conflict in the average person's life, we're literally just redefining non-problems as problems to justify everything from individual excuses to political movements.
(3) This doesn't even mean there are no racial issues. Blacks can wonder about mortgage lending, or whites gripe about affirmative action. But, those are issues of slight variance within massive systems. Noone is often racially insulting you...unless you redefine what that means.
Read 4 tweets
Wilfred Reilly Profile picture
20 Feb
A good quick definition of "equity," in the legal sense of what activists want, would be "treating people/groups as differently as is needed to achieve equal outcomes."
(2) The problem, again, is the Sowell-less assumption that all group gaps must be due to current or past bias. This often makes no sense. Hispanic immigrants don't earn less than Black or Appalachian folks because they suffered more here historically. Same for whites v Asians.
(3) For that matter, for both poor Black AND white communities, many of the most serious problems - fatherlessness, hyper-high crime - date to 1960s welfare culture rather than to the deep past, and are unlikely to be solved by offering more unearned money or college slots today.
Read 4 tweets
Wilfred Reilly Profile picture
13 Feb
I make four basic points about racism. 1st, there obviously is mild but REAL racism in the USA...like every human society. Studies find that that 8% of whites wouldn't vote for a qualified Black President (Pew 2016), Blacks are 6-9% less likely to be rented a nice apartment, etc.
(2) But, it can't be ignored that the USA spent an EXTRAORDINARY amount of blood/treasure compensating for racism this century. Brown v. Board dates back to 1954, the Civil Rights Act made discrimination ILLEGAL in '64, and pro-minority affirmative action dates to 1967.
(3) In the context of this actual history, we don't see "oppression" today as much as a complex mix of advantages for whites and POC. A Black or Hispanic student has a 200-300 point SAT advantage (Sander & Taylor 2012) over an equally qualified white kid when applying to college.
Read 6 tweets
Wilfred Reilly Profile picture
11 Feb
Subtle racism DOES exist. When I was in the nightlife business, a life-world ago, clubs paid a promoter friend $5 per head to bring in patrons. NO club - not one: white, Black, Hispanic - would pay for fighting-age males of their non-primary race, and this hit POC the hardest.
(2) The real question is how much impact this sort of thing - which is what probably 90% of good Sociological studies focus on finding - has in the real world, where it is countered by less-often-studied affirmative action, majority non-racism, and MINORITY group preferences.
(3) My take, looking at U.S. group income and education data is: not much. Many/most of the most successful groups in the USA (Indians, E. Asians, Nigerians) are POC, and even W/B gaps largely collapse after basic adjustments for things like age, region, and test scores.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @wil_da_beast630 has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @wil_da_beast630!

Read all threads by @wil_da_beast630