A few random, fairly unoriginal thoughts on the Dutch election results:
1.despite excitable coverage, the most remarkable thing about the result is how unremarkable it was. Rutte’s VVD finished top for 4th election in a row. A man who has been PM for more +ten years will probably continue for another four. And after a series of crises & scandals...
... the current coalition increased its vote share and will probably remain in power. Beyond the media excitement, the Dutch state remains like an oil tanker; trundling steadily on, regardless of how rough the seas. Rutte is unstoppable.
2.The big story is clearly D66, who managed to ally with conservatives in power for years without alienating their more liberal base, and then still position themselves as agents of change.
Their success is mostly down to Sigrid Kaag herself - a skilled debater, who came across as more humane than technocratic rivals. If the Netherlands ever gets a female PM, it could be her, in another four or eight years
3.Negotiating a coalition will take ages. Most likely outcome remains a renewed VVD-D66-CDA-CU coalition - although CU could drop out, and another small party join. In theory CDA could pull out & we get a different leftish coalition under Rutte instead, but that looks unlikely.
4.A VVD-D66 -led government will clearly be more liberal than the current VVD-CDA one. In practical terms, the biggest shift may come in the finance ministry, which could pass from CDA -> D66. If so, expect a softer more pro-EU line on bailouts etc...
... perhaps less focus on austerity; more interventionist support during corona. Expect Rutte’s EU-bashing to quiet down. Coupled with the arrival of Mario Draghi, the dynamic at European summits is about to get quite different.
5.D66’s success shouldn’t hide the fact that this was an awful night for the left. GroenLinks and the SP both lost nearly half their seats. The PvdA under new female leadership did well to hold steady, but didn’t break through.
As elsewhere in Europe, the old organized-labour-social-democrat left is in trouble; caught in a tailspin from which it is struggling to recover. In covid times, climate change isn’t a major issue. Dutch Labour still hasn’t found its Tony Blair.
6.The CDA also had a bad week, losing nearly 1/4 of seats, and faces tough decisions about its future. Supporters won’t want them to leave government, but it’s hard to see how they pick up votes in another 4yrs of power sharing.
Blame for CDA’s bad result lies partly with Hugo deJ., for being a terrible health minister, but largely with Wopke Hoekstra, who despite a high flying career had never been tested in a campaign, and did badly. It’s hard to see him leading much longer. Buy shares in Peter Omzigt.
7.It’s tempting to portray the whole result as a victory over the far right, given Wilders slumping from 2nd place to 3rd. But that’s not true - the vote share of PVV+FVD+JA was higher than in 2017.
The FVD’s success isn’t unexpected but remains remarkable - apparently, doubling down on corona skepticism and paranoid conspiracy theories can actually win you more votes
8.It’s notable that Wilders quickly conceded victory to Rutte and Kaag in fairly gracious terms. For all the awfulness of his views, he’s not Trump, and does respect the democratic process.
9.Unfortunately you couldn’t say the same for Thierry Baudet. A few years ago he looked radical but in some ways appealing; during this campaign he became almost deranged - peddling conspiracies, violating basic principles of democracy, but picking up more votes in the process.
This is a disturbing development, which points to some broader failures in the way extremist ideas are reported and challenged. Covid deniers have got too easy a ride; the media’s often been supine. We shouldn’t lose sight of this when celebrating Kaag etc.
10.I’d respectfully disagree with this framing from the BBC (also shared by others). IMO one of the most remarkable things about the election was that Covid and vaccinations didn’t feature much at all - the proverbial elephant in the room
Stability and boringness in politics are reassuring in some ways, I suppose. Kaag’s rise is significant. But overall it’s hard to conclude accountability for recent failures was strong. Despite their sometimes anarchic reputation, Dutch people don’t like change.
FIN.
Ps. If you missed it, I wrote about the context and Rutte’s enduring popularity here - a few days old now but held up fairly well
I’m not really an expert poll-watcher, but six (fairly obvious) things I’ll be looking out for in the Dutch election results: #Verkiezingen2021
1. Most obviously, the seats won by Rutte’s VVD, which forecasts show fluctuating a lot. Its hard to imagine they won’t come top - but expectations are so high that disappointment feels to me somewhat inevitable. (Work on your expectation management, guys...)
Will Rutte do well enough to guarantee another solid 4 years - or fall a bit short, keep his job but spend months in difficult coalition negotiations, and maybe get edged out of office in a year or two ?
PvdA: “Vote PvdA”
Not really trying hard here, are you guys? I’d love to see the meeting where they workshopped this. “Vote Me” didn’t make the cut I guess.
2/10, must try harder.
Christian Union: “Choose what really matters”
They mean chocolate, right? I think they must mean chocolate. 4/10.
Often the Netherlands feels like an amazingly wonderful, clever, kind and peaceful corner of the world.
But sometimes it just feels like an idiotic death cult.
This is why we can’t have nice things.
I said something similar yesterday but to be clear: this is obviously disgraceful and selfish behaviour by the people involved. If you know local hospitals are overwhelmed and then you still choose to go out for a beer, then you're just not as nice as you think you are.
BUT...
When these things happen it's also a failure of *government*. You can't spend a year saying masks are pointless, cutting penalties, repeatedly arguing Dutch people are "not children who need telling what to do" (Rutte) etc and then, when stuff like this happens, just blame "kids"
Amsterdam, less than 24 hours after Mark Rutte said we can afford to take some risks because people will be careful
See also the tone of countless tweets like these, and the gleeful replies. Yes, fifteen thousand people have died but what’s a few thousand more if you can drink a beer in the sun ha ha ha. Selfish f******g morons.
This is grotesque, and people involved should think about those now battling to save lives and feel deeply ashamed.
But it’s also a failure of government. If you end up where this stuff happens *regularly* & *predictably* through the year, then @MinPres, you’ve really screwed up
Thinking a lot this morning about Dutch attitudes to government failure today (given the news that having made bold pledges about delivering covid vaccines, preparations for actually doing this are running way behind schedule)
It’s often striking to me how benign Dutch people’s attitudes seem. The pandemic is a good example: NL has been battered badly, yet Rutte’s polling at record highs. Even when things go badly, the prevailing attitude seems to be: “give them a break, they’re doing their best!”
Why is this? I think there’s a few possible (overlapping) reasons: